Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle impact assessment sophistication

International workshop

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On November 29 – 30, 1998 in Brussels, an international workshop was held to discuss Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) Sophistication. Approximately 50 LCA experts attended the workshop from North America, Europe, and Asia. Prominent practitioners and researchers were invited to present a critical review of the associated factors, including the current limitations of available impact assessment methodologies and a comparison of the alternatives in the context of uncertainty. Each set of presentations, organised into three sessions, was followed by a discussion session to encourage international discourse with a view to improving the understanding of these crucial issues. The discussions were focused around small working groups of LCA practitioners and researchers, selected to include a balance of representatives from industry, government and academia.

This workshop provided the first opportunity for International experts to address the issues related to LCIA Sophistication in an open format. Among the topics addressed were: 1) the inclusion or exclusion of backgrounds and thresholds in LCIA, 2) the necessity and practicality regarding the sophistication of the uncertainty analysis, 3) the implications of allowing impact categories to be assessed at “midpoint” vs. at “endpoint” level, 4) the difficulty of assessing and capturing the comprehensiveness of the environmental health impact category, 5) the implications of cultural/philosophical views, 6) the meaning of terms like science-based and environmental relevance in the coming ISO LCIA standard, 7) the dichotomy of striving for consistency while allowing the incorporation of state-of-the-art research, 8) the role of various types of uncertainty analysis, and 9) the role of supporting environmental analyses (e.g., risk assessments). Many of these topics addressed the need for increased sophistication in LCIA, but recognised the conflict this might have in terms of the comprehensiveness and holistic character of LCA, and LCIA in particular. The participants concluded that the exchange of ideas in this format was extremely valuable and would like to plan successive International workshops on related themes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coulon, R.;Camobreco, V.;Teulon, H.;Besnainou, J. (1997): Data Quality and Uncertainty in LCI. Int. J. LCA 2 (3) 178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fava, J.;Consoli, F;Denison, R.;Dickson, K.;Mohin, T.;Vigon, B. (1993): A Conceptual Framework for Life-Cycle Impact Assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Pensacola, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden, G. (1997): Valuation Methods Within LCA — Where are the Values? Int. J. LCA 2 (3) 163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop, M.;Hofstetter, P.;Muller-Wenk, R.;Spriensma, R. (1998): The Eco-Indicator 98 Explained. Int. J. LCA 3 (4) 352–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahl, B.;Schmincke, E. (1996): Evaluation and Decision-making Processes in Life Cycle Assessment. Int. J. LCA 1 (1) 32–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HertwiCi E.G.;Pease, W.S.;McKone,T.E. (1993): Evaluating Toxic Impact Assessment Methods: What Works Best? Environmental Science and Toxicology 32, 138A-145A

    Google Scholar 

  • Hkrtwich, E.G. (1999): Toxic Equivalency: Accounting for Human Health in Life-Cycle Impact Assessment. PhD thesis, Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hkrtwich, E. G.;McKonf, T.E.;Pease, W.S. (in press): Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Evaluative Fate and Exposure Models. Risk Analysis

  • Hoistkhtr, P. (1998): Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A Structure Approach to Combine Models of the Technosphere, Ecosphere and Valuesphere. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organisation for Standardisation (1999): ISO/DIS 14042: Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Life Cycle Impact Assessment

  • Owens, J.W.;Amey, E.;Barnthousk, E.;Consoi.i, E;Coulon, R.;Fava, J.;HumPHrEys, K.;Haae, B.;Hunt, B.;Laibson, L.;Mones, E.;Noesen, S.;Norris, G.;Todd, J.A.;Vigon, B.;Weitz, K.;Younc;,J. (1997): Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: State of the Art. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Pensacola, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Potting;,J.;Hauschild, M. (1997): Spatial Differentiation in Life-Cycle Assessment via the Site-Dependent Characterisation of Environmental Impact from Emission. Int. J. LCA 2 (4). 209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potting, J.;Hauschild, M.;Wknzel, H. (1999): “Less is Better” and “Only Above Threshold”: Two Incompatible Paradigms for Human Toxicity in Life Cycle Assessment. Int. J. LCA 4(1) 16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.;Pearce, D.W.;Craighill, A.L. (1996): Approaches to Valuation in LCA Impact Assessment. Int. J. LCA 2(1)11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes, H.;Jolliet, O.;Finnveden, G.;Schauschild, M.;Krewitt, W;Muller-Wenk, R. (1999a): Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment — Part 1. Int. J. LCA 4 (2) 66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes, H.;Jolliet, O.;Finnveden, G.;Hauschild, M.;Krewitt, W;Muller-Wenk, R. (1999b): Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment — Part 2. Int. J. LCA 4 (3) 167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes, H. (ed.) (1996): Towards a Methodology for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. SETAC-Europe Working Group on Impact Assessment, Brussels UNEP Industry and Environment (1996): Life Cycle Assessment: What is it and How to Do It. United Nations Publication Sales no. 9C-III-D.2, Paris, France

  • UNEP Industry and Environment (1998): Draft Workshop Summary — Towards Global Use of LCA, Paris, France

  • Volkwein, S.;Gihr, R.;Klöpffer, W. (1996a): The Valuation Step Within LCA. Part I: General Principles. Int. J. LCA 1 (1)36–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, S.;Gihr, R.;Kloim-ter, W. (1996b): The Valuation Step Within LCA. Part II: A Formalized Method of Prioritization by Expert Panels. Int. J. LCA 1 (4) 182–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, H. (1998): Application Dependency of LCA Methodology: Key Variables and Their Mode of Influencing the Method. Int. J. LCA 3 (5) 281–287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 45268, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

    Jane C. Bare

  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 45268, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

    David W. Pennington

  3. Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University, 9518, NL-2300, RA Leiden, Netherlands

    Helias A. Udo de Haes

Authors
  1. Jane C. Bare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David W. Pennington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Helias A. Udo de Haes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane C. Bare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bare, J.C., Pennington, D.W. & Haes, H.A.U.d. Life cycle impact assessment sophistication. Int J LCA 4, 299–306 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979184

Keywords

Search

Navigation