Abstract
Complementary to VITO’s demonstration project on the use of biodiesel as engine fuel (including on the road emission measurements), a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) has been performed for rapeseed methyl ester (RME) and fossil diesel fuel. The LCA study covers: (1) a description of the LCA methodology used; (2) an inventory of the consumption of energy and materials and the discharges to the environment for both alternative fuels; and (3) a comparative impact assessment. The LCA inventoried all environmental impacts (resource consumption, emissions, waste) from cradle to grave. After the classification of these burdens into environmental impact categories, the environmental profiles of the two automotive fuels have been compared. Moreover, sensitivity analyses on the most important parameters have been carried out (e.g. type of fertiliser, data source, allocation method). The results of this comparative LCA can be used in the final decision-making process including the results of a social and economical assessment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Friedrich, A., Glante, F., Schlüter, C., Golz, C., Nöh, I., Reinhard, G., Höpfner, U., Satorius, R., Benndorf, R., Blumel, H., Schärer, B. and Rodt, S.: Ökologische Bilanz von Rapsöl bzw. Rapsölmethylester als Ersatz von Dieselkraftstoff; Report of the Umweltbundesamt, Texte 4/93; Berlin, Germany; 1993 (in German)
Oegema, T. and Posma, G.: Rapportage Analyse Biodiesel: Milieuanalyse en economie van de bedrijfstak; Report commissioned by WLTO and executed by IMSA; Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 1994 (in Dutch)
Grass, S. and Heim, T.: Ökologische Risikoanalyse und Wirtschaftlichkeitsberechnungen der landwirtschaftlichten, Rapsmethylester: Produktion sowie zweier alternativer Anbauszenarien; Report of Carbotech AG; Zürich, Switzerland; 1991 (in German)
Mangan, C., Kerckow, B. and Flanagan, M.: Catalogue of Contracts of the AIR Programme 1991–1994/Non-food, Bio-energy and Forestry; European Commission EUR 16206EN; Luxembourg; 1995
SETAC-LCA News: Biodiesel LCA project initiated; in SETAC- LCA News, Volume 6, issue 2, 1996
Console, F., Allen, D., Boustead, I., Fava, J., Franklin, W., Jensen, A.A., de Oude, N., Parrish, R., Perriman, R., Postethwaite, D., Quay, B., Séguin, J., Veigon, B. (Eds): Guidelines for Life Cycle Assessment: A Code of Practise; Report from the workshop of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), held at Sesimbra (Portugal); Brussels, Belgium; 1993
Haberstatter, K. and Widmer, F.: Ökobilanz von Packstoffen, Stand 1990; Schriftenreibe Umwelt, Nr 132; Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL); Bern, Switzerland, 1991 (in German)
Lindfors, L.G., Christiansen, K., Hoffman, L., Virtanen, Y., Juntilla, V., Hanssen, O.J., Rønning, A., Ekvall, T. andFinnveden, G.: Nordic Guidelines on Life Cycle Assessment, Nord 1995: 20; Nordic Council of Ministers; Copenhagen, Denmark; 1995
Goedkoop, M.: The Eco-indicator 95; Final report of the National Reuse of Waste Research Programme (NOH) carried out by PRé Consultants; Amersfoort, the Netherlands; 1995
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spirinckx, C., Ceuterick, D. Biodiesel and fossil diesel fuel: Comparative life cycle assessment. Int. J. LCA 1, 127–132 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978938
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978938