Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle assessment of cane-sugar on the island of mauritius

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal, Scope and Background

Agricultural production includes not only crop production, but also food processing, transport, distribution, preparation, and disposal. The effects of all these must be considered and controlled if the food chain is to be made sustainable. The goal of this case study was to identify and review the significant areas of potential environmental impacts across the whole life cycle of cane sugar on the island of Mauritius.

Methods

The functional unit was one tonne of exported raw sugar from the island. The life cycle investigated includes the stage of cane cultivation and harvest, cane burning, transport, fertilizer and herbicide manufacture, cane sugar manufacture and electricity generation from bagasse. Data was gathered from companies, factories, sugar statistics, databases and literature. Energy depletion, climate change, acidification, oxidant formation, nutrification, aquatic ecotoxicity and human toxicity were assessed.

Results and Discussion

The inventory of the current sugar production system revealed that the production of one tonne of sugar requires, on average, a land area of 0.12 ha, the application of 0.84 kg of herbicides and 16.5 kg of N-fertilizer, use of 553 tons of water and 170 tonne-km of transport services. The total energy consumption is about 14235 MJ per tonne of sugar, of which fossil fuel consumption accounts for 1995 MJ and the rest is from renewable bagasse. 160 kg of CO2 per tonne of sugar is released from fossil fuel energy use and the net avoided emissions of CO2 on the island due to the use of bagasse as an energy source is 932,000 tonnes. 1.7 kg TSP, 1.21 kg SO2,1.26 kgNOxand 1.26 kg CO are emitted to the air per tonne of sugar produced. 1.7 kg N, 0.002 kg herbicide, 19.1 kg COD, 13.1 kgTSS and 0.37 kg PO4 3- are emitted to water per tonne of sugar produced. Cane cultivation and harvest accounts for the largest environmental impact (44%) followed by fertilizer and herbicide manufacture (22%), sugar processing and electricity generation (20%), transportation (13%) and cane burning (1%). Nutrification is the main impact followed by acidification and energy depletion.

Conclusions

There are a number of options for improvement of the environmental performance of the cane-sugar production chain. Cane cultivation, and fertilizer and herbicide manufacture, were hotspots for most of the impact categories investigated. Better irrigation systems, precision farming, optimal use of herbicides, centralisation of sugar factories, implementation of co-generation projects and pollution control during manufacturing and bagasse burning are measures that would considerably decrease resource use and environmental impacts.

Recommendation and Outlook

LCA was shown to be a valuable tool to assess the environmental impacts throughout the food production chain and to evaluate government policies on agricultural production systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson K (2000): LCA of Food Products and Production Systems. Int J LCA 5 (4) 239–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson K, Ohlsson T, Olsson P (1994): LCA of Food Products and Production Systems. Trends Food Sci & Techn J, 134–138

  • Andersson K, Ohlsson T (1999): Life Cycle Assessment of Bread Products on Different Scales. Int J LCA 4 (1) 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Audsley E (Ed), Alber S, Cliff R, Cowell S, Gaillard G, Hausheer J, Jolliet O, Kleijn R, Martensen B, Pearce D, Roger E, Teulan H, Weidema B, Van Zeits H (1997): Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture. Final Report. Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-2028, Silsoe Research Institute, Bedford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Boever JMC, Meyer E (1984): Testing Haulage Tractors. Proc S Afr Sugar Technol Ass 214–218

  • Borjesson P (1996): Energy Analysis of Biomass Production and Transportation. Biomass and Bioenergy 11, 305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brentrup F, Kusters J, Lammel J, Kahlmann H (2000): Methods to Estimate on-field Nitrogen Emissions from Crop Production as an Input to LCA studies in the Agricultural sector. Int J LCA 5 (6) 349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Beer G, Hudson JL, Meyer E, Torres JS (1993): Cost Effective Mechanization. Sugar Cane (4) 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepchand (2000): Bagasse Energy Development-The Mauritian Experience. International Sugar Journal 102 (1215) 242–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Economopoulos (1993): Assessment of Sources of Air, Water and Land Pollution. A guide to rapid source inventory techniques and their use in formulating environmental control strategies. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinee J (2002): Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment-Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Klumer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Guinée JB. Huppes, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, Van Dain R, de Goede HP (1992): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products: I, Guide; II, Backgrounds. CML, Leiden University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1998): Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis. ISO 14041: 1998. International Standardization Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquin E, Poser L (1994): La plantation mechanique de la canne a sucre à Maurice. PROSI Magazine 307, 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeijer E, van Kampen, M, Fraanje P, van Dobben H, Nabuurs GJ, Scou-wenberg E, Prins D, Dankers N (1998): Biodiversity and life support indicators for land use impacts in LCA. IVAM ER Amsterdam, IBN-DLO Wageningen and Texel, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann MK, Spath PL (1997 Life Cycle Assessment of a Biomass Gasification Combined-cycle System. NREIVTP-430-23076, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

  • Marland G, Turhollow A (1991): C02 emissions from the production and combustion of fuel ethanol from corn. Energy-The International Journal 16, 1307–1316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson B, Cederberg C, Ljung M (1998): Principles for Environmental Assessment of Land Use in Agriculture. SIK-Report No. 642, SIK, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson B (1996): Life Cycle Assessment of Agricultural and Industrial Food Production. In: New Research in Organic Agriculture. Proceedings Vol 2, 11th International Scientific IFOAM Conference, Copenhagen 1996, pp 180–184

  • Meyer E (1998): A Model to estimate combine harvester and infield transport performance and costs. Proc S Afr Sug Technol Ass 72, 58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • MOA (2001): Sugar Sector Strategic Plan 2001-2005. Ministry of Agriculture. Port Louis, Mauritius

    Google Scholar 

  • MSA (1994): Characterization of Sugar Industry Wastes and Pollution Control. Mauritius Sugar Authority (MSA). Port Louis, Mauritius

    Google Scholar 

  • MSIRI (2000): Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute. Annual Report 2000. Mauritius

  • MSIRI (2001): Agrochemical movement in tropical sugar production. International Extension Workshop. Mauritian Sugar Industry Research Institute. June 2001, Mauritius

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng Kee Kwong KF, Deville J (1984): Nitrogen leaching from soils cropped with sugar cane under the humid tropical climate of Mauritius, Indian Ocean. J Environ Qual 13, 471–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng Kee Kwong KF (1995): La pollution des eaux par les produits agrochimiques. PROSI Magazine 320, pp 16–18, Mauritius

  • NRI (1995): Alleviation of pollution from agro industry in developing countries. Case study of the Mauritian cane-sugar Industry. Natural Resources Institute (NRI), UK

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994): Biofuels. BEA’s Energy and Environmental Policy Analysis. Paris Ramjeawon T (1994): Water Resources Management on the small island of Mauritius. International Journal of Water Resources Development 10 (2) 187–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramjeawon T (1995): Evaluation of Critical BOD loading from Mauritian Sugar Factories and Standard Setting. Journal of Environmental Management 45, 63–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramjeawon T, Baguant J (1996): Water requirements and potential for conservation in Mauritian cane-sugar factories. International Sugar Journal 98 (1171) 351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramjeawon T (2000): Cleaner Production in Mauritian Cane-Sugar Factories. Journal of Cleaner Production. 8, 503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umrit C, Deville J, Ng Kee Kwong KE (1992): Leaching and persistence of Atrazine in 2 soils of Mauritius. Revue Agricole et Sucrieer de L’Ile Maurice 71 (2&3) 332–338

  • UNEP (1996): Intergovernmental panel on climate change greenhouse gas inventory workbook. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories

  • UNEP (1996): Life Cycle Assessment. What it is and How to do it. UNEP-DTIE. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1995): United States Environment Protection Agency. State Workbook Methodologies for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2nd Edition, EPA 230-B-95-001. Washington D.C: Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius

    Toolseeram Ramjeawon

Authors
  1. Toolseeram Ramjeawon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toolseeram Ramjeawon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramjeawon, T. Life cycle assessment of cane-sugar on the island of mauritius. Int J LCA 9, 254–260 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978601

Keywords

Search

Navigation