Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of serum tumor markers in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients treated with systemic therapy: A prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The significance of serum tumor markers in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients is still controversial. To clarify this issue, the Tumor Marker Study Group of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society conducted a prospective study.

Methods

Patients with advanced breast cancer who were treated with systemic therapy between January and December 2002 were recruited from five collaborative institutes in Japan. The patients were monitored every four weeks using three serum tumor markers, CEA, CA 15-3 and NCC-ST-439 during the therapy.

Results

Findings from 108 eligible patients were analyzed. The pretreatment positivity rates were 51.9% for CEA, 50% for CA 15-3, and 34.3% for NCC-ST-439. The changes in each marker level at 8 and 12 weeks but not at 4 weeks after the start of therapy seemed to correlate with the response to therapy in pretreatment marker-positive patients but not in negative patients. The Cox proportional hazard model revealed a greater than 20% reduction in CEA, CA 15-3 or NCC-ST-439 levels at 4, 8 and/or 12 weeks after the start of therapy to be an independent predictive factor for longer time-to-progression (TTP) in pretreatment marker-positive patients.

Conclusion

This prospective study supported the findings obtained from our previous retrospective study that in pretreatment marker-positive patients 1) the changes in serum tumor marker levels after the start of therapy correlate with the response to therapy; and 2) a greater than 20% reduction in the tumor marker levels was a favorable predictive factor for TTP during systemic therapy. When the pretreatment serum level of these markers is over the respective cut-off value, sequential measurement of them may be useful for evaluating the efficacy of treatment as well as monitoring the outcome of patients with advanced breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

TTP:

Time-to-progression

CR:

Complete response

PR:

Partial response

NC:

No change

PD:

Progressive disease

References

  1. Bast RCJr, Ravdin P, Hayes DF,et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology Tumor Markers Expert Panel: 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.J Clin Oncol 19:1865–1878, 2001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurebayashi J, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka K,et al: Current status of tumor markers of breast cancer in Japan: a questionanaire survey to the board members of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society.Jpn J Breast Cancer 17:165–169, 2002 (in Japanese with English Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kurebayashi J, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka K,et al: Significance of serum carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15- 3 in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients treated with systemic therapy: a large-scale retrospective study.Breast Cancer 10:38–44, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heusen JC,et al: Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer.BrJ Cancer 35:292–298, 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tondini C, Hayes DF, Gelman R,et al: Comparison of CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen in monitoring the clinical course of patients with metastatic breast cancer.Cancer Res 48:4107–4112, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colomer R, Ruibal A, Salvador L: Circulating tumor marker levels in advanced breast carcinoma correlate with the extent of metastatic disease.Cancer 64:1674–1681, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vizcarra E, Lluch A, Cibrian R,et al: Value of CA 15.3 in breast cancer and comparison with CEA and TPA: a study of specificity in disease-free follow-up patients and sensitivity in patients at diagnosis of the first metastasis.Breast Cancer Res Treat 37:209–216, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guadagni F, Ferroni P, Carlini S,et al: A re-evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a serum marker for breast cancer: a prospective longitudinal study.Clin Cancer Res 7:2357–2362, 2001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiang DT, Greenberg LJ, Kennedy BJ: Tumor marker kinetics in the monitoring of breast cancer.Cancer 65:193–199, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sonoo H, Kurebayashi J: Serum tumor marker kinetics and the clinical course of patients with advanced breast cancer.Surg Today 26:250–257, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson JF, Whynes DK, Dixon A,et al: Potential for cost economies in guiding therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.BrJ Cancer 72:174–177, 1995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kurebayashi, J., Nishimura, R., Tanaka, K. et al. Significance of serum tumor markers in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients treated with systemic therapy: A prospective study. Breast Cancer 11, 389–395 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02968047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02968047

Key words

Navigation