Skip to main content
Log in

Systematic overview of quality of life studies for breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The concept of quality of life (QOL) is essentially subjective, determined from the patient’s point of view. Thus, an appropriate investigation and analysis of QOL as an indicator of medical treatment outcome is a task of some difficulty. The physician-led QOL assessment studies to date in Japan have suffered from insufficient knowledge and understanding of the diverse factors contributing to QOL, thereby contributing to a dearth of quality studies. Given this background, the Japanese Breast Cancer Society has established a Task Force for the development of guidelines to properly conduct QOL assessment studies. The present article reports the results of a large-scale systematic overview of QOL assessment studies for breast cancer patients that was undertaken as one part of this project.

Methods

Six databases were used in this overview: MEDLINE, CINAHL, CANCERLIT, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina. The search period was 1982-1999 for CINAHL, and 1990-1999 for the others. Following a check of the titles, important information was recorded on relevance and data collection forms.

Results

A systematic search was conducted of the literature on QOL assessment studies for breast cancer patients, and 1,954 articles were extracted from a check of titles. Using the relevance and data collection forms, the number of articles was further narrowed to 126. These articles were then classified according to the type and design of the study, the number of QOL and psychological measures used, frequency of use of each measure, and study focus and type of intervention. The results were then compiled.

Conclusion

To date there have been almost no appropriate systematic overviews or guidelines issued for QOL assessment studies related to breast cancer, even on the international level. The results of the present study may contribute high-quality QOL information for evidence-based medicine, as it continues to gain global prevalence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

QOL:

Quality of life

FACT:

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale

EORTC QLQ:

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire

SF-36:

MOS Short Form 36

STAI:

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

POMS:

Profile of Mood States

HADS:

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

GHQ:

General Health Questionnaire

References

  1. Eguchi K, Kurihara M, Shimozuma K,et al: Quality of life assessment measure for patients with chemotherapy.J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther 28: 1140–1144, 1993 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurihara M, Shimizu H, Tsuboi K,et al: Development of quality of life questionnaire in Japan: Quality of life assessment of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Psychooncology 8:355–363, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G,et al: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.J Clin Oncol 11: 570–579, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B,et al: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ware, J: SF-36 Health Survey Manual, and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Hospital, Boston, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE: Manual for State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Self-Evaluating Questionnaire). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McNair, DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF: The profile of mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale.Acta Psychiatr Scand 67: 361–370, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg DP: The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire: A technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic psychiatric illness. Maudsley Monograph No. 21, Oxford University Press, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, DP, Williams P: A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire: GHQ, National Foundation for education research, Nelson Publishing, Berkshore, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shimozuma K, Okamoto T, Osumi S,et al for the Task Force of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society: Development of Guidelines for Quality of Life Assessment Studies of Breast Cancer Patients. Japanese Breast Cancer Society (in press) (in Japanese).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Reprint requests to Kojiro Shimozuma, Institute for Scientific Research of Stress, Public Health Research Foundation, Ochanomizu Oyaide Building 4F, 1-9-5, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0034, Japan.

About this article

Cite this article

Shimozuma, K., Okamoto, T., Katsumata, N. et al. Systematic overview of quality of life studies for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 9, 196–202 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967589

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967589

Key words

Navigation