Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of boost irradiation with surgically placed radiopaque clips on local control in breast-conserving therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 April 2002

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine whether boost irradiation relying on radiopaque clips placed surgically around the resected margin of breast cancer contributes to increasing the local control rate in patients with close or positive margins in breast-conserving therapy (BCT).

Methods

Among 837 patients with breast cancer who underwent BCT between November 1987 and December 1998, 181 patients with close or positive surgical margins received boost irradiation following conventional tangential whole breast irradiation. Since 1994, four radiopaque clips were surgically placed around the resected margin of the breast cancer in 155 patients treated with wide excision. The four clips were clearly and accurately identified with a CT-simulator (CT-S). The boost irradiation field was automatically determined with a safety margin of 3 cm according to one-to-one correspondence of radiopaque clips to pathologically close or positive surgical margins. In the remaining 26 patients treated before 1994, the boost irradiation field was determined according to the skin tattoo of the primary tumor.

Resulfs

The median follow-up period of the 155 patients receiving the radiopaque clips was 42 months (range: 19 to 78), and that of the 26 patients without the clips was 87 months. Local recurrence was observed in two of the 155 patients who underwent boost irradiation using the radiopaque clips 39 and 54 months after the surgery, while 4 of the 26 patients developed local recurrence 14, 23, 51, and 76 months after BCT. In three of the four patients without the clips developing local recurrences, local recurrences were observed at the margin of the boost irradiation field. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate of patients who received boost irradiation with the radiopaque clips was 97%, and that of patients without the clips was 88%. The difference of local recurrence-free survival rates between the patients with and without the clips was significant (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Surgically placed radiopaque clips appear to be useful for determining adequate boost field in the BCT using the CT-S and help increase the local control rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BCT:

Breast-conserving therapy

CT-S:

CT-simulator

References

  1. van Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS,et al: Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breastconserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer, EORTC 10801 trial.Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 11: 15–18, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH,et al: Tenyear results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer.N Engl J Med 332: 907–911, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK,et al: Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.N Engl J Med 333: 1456–1461, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A,et al: Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomized trials on 1,973 patients.Eur J Cancer 31A: 1574–1579, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F,et al: Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group.J Clin Oncol 14: 1558–1564, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer.JAMA 265: 391–395, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Solin LJ, Danoff BF, Schwartz GF,et al: A practical technique for the localization of the tumor volume in definitive irradiation of the breast.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11: 1215–1220, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Regine WF, Ayyangar KM, Komarnicky LT,et al: Computer-CT planning of the electron boost in definitive breast irradiation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 20: 121–125, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedwinek J: Breast conserving surgery and irradiation: the importance of demarcating the excision cavity with surgical clips.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26: 675–679, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Machtay M, Lanciano R, Hoffman J,et al: Inaccuracies in using the lumpectomy scar for planning electron boosts in primary breast carcinoma.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30: 43–48, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrington KJ, Harrison M, Bayle P,et al: Surgical clips in planning the electron boost in breast cancer: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 34: 579–584, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter MA, McFall TA, Hehr KA: Breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer: necessity for surgical clips to define the tumor bed for radiation planning.Radiology 200: 281–282, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fein DA, Fowble BL, Hanlon AL,et at: Does the placement of surgical clips within the excision cavity influence local control for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and irradiation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 34: 1009–1017, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hiraoka M, Kodama H, Mitsumori M,et at: Preliminary results of quadrantectomy and radiation therapy for breast cancer.Breast Cancer 1: 117–122, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishikura S, Mitsumori M, Ishigaki T,et at: Clinical results of breast conserving therapy for stage I and II breast cancers: Assessment of local recurrences in relation to surgical margins.Int J Clin Oncol 1: 170–175, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kokubo M, Mitsumori M, Ishikura S,et at: Results of breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer: Kyoto University experiences.Am J Clin Oncol 23: 499–505, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hiraoka M, Mitsumori M, Okajima K,et at: Use of a CT simulator in radiotherapy treatment planning for breast conserving therapy.Radiother Oncol 33: 48–55, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher ER, Anderson S, Redmond C,et at: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and survival following lumpectomy and irradiation: pathological findings from NSABP protocol B-06.Semin Surg Oncol 8: 161–166, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fowble B, Solin LJ, Schultz DJ,et at: Breast recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation: patterns of failure, prognosis, and pathologic findings from mastectomy specimens with implications for treatment.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19: 833–842, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Recht A, Silen W, Schnitt SJ,et al: Time-course of local recurrence following conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 15: 255–261, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurtz JM, Amalric R, Brandone H,et at: Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Frequency, time course, and prognosis.Cancer 63: 1912–1917, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chu AM, Cope O, Russo R,et at: Patterns of localregional recurrence and results in Stages I and II breast cancer treated by irradiation following limited surgery. An update.Am J Clin Oncol 7: 221–229, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryoo MC, Kagan AR, Wollin M,et at: Prognostic factors for recurrence and cosmesis in 393 patients after radiation therapy for early mammary carcinoma.Radiology 172: 555–559, 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DJ,et al: The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21: 279–287, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M,et at: Histologic multifocality of Tis, Tl-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery.Cancer 56: 979–990, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Messer PM, Kirikuta IC, Bratengeier K,et at: CT planning of boost irradiation in radiotherapy of breast cancer after conservative surgery.Radiother Oncol 42: 239–243, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamai K, Mitsumori M, Fujishiro S,et al: A case of allergic reaction to surgical metal clips inserted for postoperative boost irradiation in a patient undergoing breast-conserving therapy.Breast Cancer 8: 90–92, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdallah HI, Balsara RK, O’Riordan AC: Pacemaker contact sensitivity: clinical recognition and management.Ann Thorac Surg 57: 1017–1018, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lalor PA, Revell PA, Gray AB,et at: Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure?J Bone Joint Surg Br 73: 25–28, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Reprint requests to Masaki Kokubo, Department of Image-based Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, 2–2 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02967586.

About this article

Cite this article

Kokubo, M., Mitsumori, M., Yamamoto, C. et al. Impact of boost irradiation with surgically placed radiopaque clips on local control in breast-conserving therapy. Breast Cancer 8, 222–228 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967512

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967512

Key words

Navigation