Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component and small invasive foci of Breast Cancer

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to eliminate local residual cancer to avoid local recurrence after breast conserving treatment. Many efforts have been made to detect extensive intraductal components (EICs) and small invasive foci of breast cancer by diagnostic imaging including MRI and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). The abilities and limitations of CE-CT are reviewed in this article. The sensitivity of EIC detection by CE-CT ranges from 76% to 88%, and specificity from 79% to 89%. The sensitivity for detecting EIC and cancerous lesions were significantly higher for CE-CT than for US or MMG. The enhanced patterns of CE-CT demonstrating EIC and small invasive foci were classified into diffuse, spotty, linear and multiple types. The differences of the size of cancerous extension by CE-CT from the pathological EIC were within 2 cm in almost all cases. CE-CT is useful for visualizing EIC and small invasive foci of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EIC:

Extensive intraductal component

CE-CT:

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography

vBCT:

Breast conserving treatment

MMG:

Mammography

US:

Ultrasonography

MPR:

Multi planar reconstruction

WSIC:

Wide-spread intraductal component

LCIS:

Lobular carcinomain situ

VNPI:

Van Nuys Prognostic Index

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin stain

References

  1. Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J,et al: Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.J Clin Oncol 17:101–109, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Khettry U,et al: Pathologic findings in re-excision of the primary site in breast cancer patients considered for treatment by primary radiation therapy.Cancer 59:675–681, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ansher M, Jones P, Prosnitz L,et al: Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.Ann Surg 218:22–28, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher B, Redmond C: Lumpectomy for breast cancer: an update of the NSABP experience.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 11:7, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takashima S: Assessment of Mammographic diagnosis for the indication of breast-conserving therapy - special reference to extensive intraductal component and mammographic calcifications.Jpn J Breast Cancer 9:403–411, 1994 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tsunoda-Shimazu H, Ueno E, Tohno E,et al: Ultra-sonographic evaluation for breast conservative therapy.Jpn J Breast Cancer 11:649–655, 1996 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Healey EA, Osteen RT, Schnitt SJ,et al: Can the clinical and mammographic findings at presentation predict the presence of an intensive intraductal component in early stage breast cancer?.Int J Radiat Oncol BiolPhys 17:1217–1221, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Endo T, Ichihara S, Aoyama H,et al: The indications for breast conserving surgery on mammography.Jpn J Breast Cancer 11:643–648, 1996 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weinreb JC, Newstead G: MR imaging of the breast. [Review].Radiology 196:593–610, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M,et al: Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas.Cancer 56:979–990, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Boetes C, Mus RDM, Holland R,et al: Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.Radiology 197:74, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kamio T, Kameoka S, Hamano K,et al: Indication for breast conservative surgery by ultrasonography.Jpn J Breast Cancer 11:656–664, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muramatsu Y, Akiyama N, Hanai K: Medical exposure in lung cancer screening by helical computed tomography.Jpn J Radiol Technol 52:1–8, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tsunoda HS, Ueno E, Tohno E,et al: Echogram of ductal spreading of breast carcinoma.Jpn J Med Ultrasonics 17:44–48, 1990 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Miyakawa K,et al: Diagnostic value of enhanced computed tomography in the detection of the widely spreading intraductal component of breast cancer: Case reports.Breast Cancer 4:29–32, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Miyakawa K,et al: Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component of breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat 49:79–86, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hiramatsu H, Enomoto K, Ikeda T,et al: Three-dimensional helical CT for treatment planning of breast cancer.Radiation Medicine 17:35–40, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uematsu T, Sano M, Homma K: Helical CT of the breast.Jpn J Cancer Clin 46:593–599, 2000 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Folkman J, Watson K, Ingber D,et al: Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia.Nature 339:58–61, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH,et al: A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.Cancer 77:2267–74, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Silverstein MJ, Waisman JR, Gierson ED,et al: Radiation therapy for intraductal carcinoma.Arch Surg 126:424–428, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adler DD, Wahl RL: New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.Am J Radiol 164:19–30, 1995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F,et al: Tumor angiogenesis: A new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinomas.J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1875–1887, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Revel D, Brasch R, Paajanen H: Gd-DTPA contrast enhancement and tissue differentiation in MR imaging of experimental breast carcinoma.Radiology 158:319–323, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kurtzman SH, MacGillivray DC, Deckers PJ: Evolving strategies for the management of non-palpable breast abnormalities.Surg Oncol 4:1–14, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Flanagan F, Gilligan P, McInerney D,et al: MR mammography: a prepathologic predictor of breast tumor behavior? (abstr).Radiology 193:267, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Miyakawa K,et al: Clinical use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for decision making in breast conserving surgery.Breast Cancer 4:280–284, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Akashi-Tanaka, S., Fukutomi, T., Miyakawa, K. et al. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component and small invasive foci of Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer 8, 10–15 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967473

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967473

Key words

Navigation