Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

State of the art of minimally invasive breast biopsy: Principles and practice

  • Luncheon Seminar III
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last two decades, the increasing use of screening mammography with the early detection of breast cancer and the newly gained understanding of the biology and changing therapy of breast cancer, emphasizing systemic therapy and minimizing extensive local surgery, has contributed to the increasing development of minimally invasive techniques for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Minimally invasive techniques provide increased patient comfort, excellent cosmetic result and minimal morbidity They are also responsible for decreased costs and better medical care by allowing an informed discussion of breast cancer therapy and planning of surgery with an emphasis on negative margins and the dissection of the sentinel node.

Techniques in use include Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology, Core-Needle biopsy, Vacuum-Assisted Core biopsy (Mammotome) and Large Core biopsy (ABBI, Site-select). We present a balanced, evidence-based approach to the diagnosis of patients with palpable or mammographic abnormalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenley RT, Murray T, Bolden S,et al: Cancer Statistics 2000.CA Cancer J Clin 50:7–33, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B: From Halsted to prevention and beyond: Advances in the management of breast cancer during the twentieth century.Eur J Cancer 35:1963–1973, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leitch M: Breast cancer screening: Success amid conflict.Surg One Clin North America 8:657–672, 1999.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P,et al: Periodic screening for breast cancer: the Health Insurance Plan project and its sequelae, 1963–1986. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S,et al: Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomized trials.Lancet 341:973–978, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW,et al: Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.Radiologic Clinics of North America, 30:187–210, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ,et al: Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years.Lancet 335:241–246, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bailar JC, MacMahon B: Randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a review for evidence of subversion.Canadian Medical Association Journal 156:193–199, 1997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baines CJ, Miller AB, Kopans DB,et al: Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review. American Journal of Radiology 155:743–747, 1990.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 47:825–830, 1998.

  11. Cady B, Stone MD, Schuler JG,et al: The new era in breast cancer invasion,size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening.Arch Surg 131:310–306, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The ACR and screening mammography: Consensus and continued commitment.ACR Bulletin 53:4–9, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cady B: New era in Breast Cancer: Impact of Screening on disease Presentation.Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America 6:195–202, 1997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vargas HI, Chou J, Venegas R,et al: Annual Meeting of the American College of Surgeons, Southern California Chapter. 2000 Abstract #

  15. Kaufman C, Delbecq R, Jacobson L: Excising the Reexcision: Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy decreases Need for Reexcision of Breast Cancer.W J Surg 22:1023–28, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T,et al: The sentinel node in breast cancer-a multicenter validation study.N Engl J Med 339:941–946, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bryant HE, Desautels JEL, Castor WR,et al: Quality Assurance and Cancer Detection rates in a Provincial Screening Mammography Program.Radiology 188:811–816, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Burhenne LJ, Hislop TG, Burhenne HJ: The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: Evaluation of the First 15 months.AJR American J Roentgenol 158:45–49, 1992.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dershaw DD, Liberman L, Lippin BS: Mobile Mammographic Screening of self-referred Women: Results of 22,540 screenings.Radiology 184:415–419, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cote JF, Klijanienko J, Meunier M,et al: Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: Institut Curie’s experience of 243 histologically correlated cases.Cancer 84:77–83, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL,et al: Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.Radiology 196:123–134, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hatada T, Ishii H, Ichii S,et al: Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, coreneedle biopsy, and evaluation of combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions.J Am Coll Surg 190:299–303, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boerner S, Fornage BD, Singletary E,et al: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions: A review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute-supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast.Cancer 87:19–24, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Woodcock NP, Glaves I, Morgan DR,et al: Ultrasoundguided Tru-cut biopsy of the breast. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:253–256, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Staren ED: Ultrasound-guided biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses by surgeons.Ann Surg Oncol 3:476–482, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Klijanienko J, Cote JF, Thibault F,et al: Ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: Institut Curie’s experience with 198 histologically correlated cases.Cancer 84:36–41, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ: Percutaneous Large-core Breast Biopsy: A multi-institutional study.Radiology 193:359–364, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hatada T, Ishii H, Ichii S,et al: Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, coreneedle biopsy, and evaluation of combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions.J Am Coll Surg 190:299–303, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Osanai T, Gomi N, Wakita T,et al: Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for breast cancer: Preliminary report.Jpn J Clin Oncol 30:65–67, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonnema J, van Geel AN, van Ooijen B,et al: Ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy for detection of nonpalpable axillary node metastases in breast cancer patients: New diagnostic method.World J Surg 21:270–274, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Page DL, Johnson JE, Dupont WD: Probabilistic Approach to the reporting of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of the Breast Cancer (Cancer Cytopathology) 81:6–9, 1997.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Collago LM, de Lima RS, Werner B,et al: Value of Fine Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.Acta Cytologica 43:587–592, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Uniform Approach to Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.Am J Surg 174:371–385?, 1997.

  34. Butler JA, Vargas HI, Writhen N,et al: Accuracy of combined clinical-mammographic-cytologic diagnosis of dominant breast masses: A prospective study.Arch Surg 125:893–896, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bell DA, Hindu SI, Urban JA,et al: Role of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of mammary lesions in the office practice.Cancer 51:1182–1189, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hogan PG, Waldron D, Mooney E,et al: The role of aspiration cytologic examination in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecology Obstetric 172:290–292, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Martelli G, Pilotti S, Yoldi GC,et al: Diagnostic efficacy of Physical examination, Mammography, Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (triple test) in solid breast lumps: An analysis of 1708 consecutive cases.Tumori 76:476–479, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Scheikh FA, Tinkoff GH, Kline TS,et al: Final diagnosis by Fine-Needle Aspiration biopsy for definitive operation for breast Cancer.Am J Surg 154:470–473, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J,et al: Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators.Cancer 82:679–688, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H,et al: Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14-, 16-, and 18- gauge needles.Radiology 187:739–742, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP,et al: Styereotaxis 14 gauge breast biopsy: How many core biopsy specimens are needed?Radiology 192:793–795, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR,et al: Percurtaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy.AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:341–346, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Vega A, Garijo F, Ortega E: Core needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast masses.Acta Oncol 34:31–34, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Poole GH, Willsher PC, Pinder SE,et al: Diagnosis of breast cancer with core-biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology.Aust N Z J Surg 66:592–594, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Scopa CD, Koukouras D, Spiliotis J,et al: Comparison of fine needle aspiration and Tru-Cut biopsy of palpable mammary lesions.Cancer Detect Prev 20:620–624, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E,et al: Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: A meta-analysis.Br J Cancer 82:1017–1021, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Moore MM, Hargett CW, Hanks JB,et al: Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy.Ann Surg 225:726–731, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD,et al: Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: An indication for surgical biopsy.AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1111–1113, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ballo MS, Sneige N: Can core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma: A comparative study of 124 women.Cancer 78:773–771, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Carry NJ, Ravichandran D, Carter C,et al: Randomized comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and Biopty-Cut needle biopsy after unsatisfactory initial cytology of discrete breast lesions.Br J Surg 81:1313–1314, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ: Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Improved tissue harvesting with the mammotome. Am Surg 62:738–744, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Beck RM, Gotz L, Heywang-Kobrunner SH: Stereotaxic vacuum core breast biopsy-experience of 560 patients.Swiss Surg 6:108–110, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Liberman L, Sama MP: Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:53–58, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Burak WE, Owens KE, Tighe MB,et al: Vacuumassisted stereotactic breast biopsy: Histologic underestimation of malignant lesions.Arch Surg 135:700–703, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA,et al: Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: Initial results.Radiology 215:694–797, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Vargas HI, Kakuda J, Klein SR,et al: Stereotactic ex-cisional biopsy of the breast. Annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, 1999. Abstract #

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Surgery and Radiology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA

    Hernan I. Vargas, Rodolfo V. Agbunag & Iraj Khalkhali

Authors
  1. Hernan I. Vargas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodolfo V. Agbunag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iraj Khalkhali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Vargas, H.I., Agbunag, R.V. & Khalkhali, I. State of the art of minimally invasive breast biopsy: Principles and practice. Breast Cancer 7, 370–379 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966407

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966407

Key words

Search

Navigation