Skip to main content
Log in

Non-operative management of perforated duodenal ulcer

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe the selective non-operative management of 34 patients who had an initial diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer made on acute presentation between 1984–1994 in our district surgical unit. Diagnosis of the condition was made on clinical grounds with the aid of an erect chest X-ray which demonstrated pneumoperitoneum in 28 patients (82 per cent). Six patients (18 per cent) who did not respond to non-operative treatment required surgical intervention; 3 patients had an unsealed duodenal ulcer perforation; 2 had a perforated benign gastric ulcer and 1 patient had acute gangrenous cholecystitis. The overall mortality and morbidity rate was 3 per cent and 35 per cent respectively. There were no documented reperforations over a mean follow-up period of 27 months. While these figures are acceptable and comparable with operative intervention for this condition, we do however stress the labour intensive methods and close clinical monitoring that is required to avoid morbid sequelae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor, H. Aspiration treatment perforated ulcers. Lancet 1951; 1:7–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor, H. The non-surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Gastroenterology 1957; 33: 353–368.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keane, T. E., Dillon, B., Afdhal, N. H., McCormack. C. J. Conservative management of perforated duodenal ulcer. Br. J. Surg. 1988; 75: 583–584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crofts, T. J., Park, K. G. M., Steele, R. J. C., Chung, S. S. C., Li, A. K. C. A randomized trial of non-operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989; 320: 970–973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seeley, S. F., Campbell, D. Non-operative treatment of perforated peptic ulcer: a further report. Surg. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1956; 102: 435–446.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinagawa, N., Muramoto, M., Sakurai, S. et al. A bacteriological study of perforated duodenal ulcers. Jpn. J. Surg. 1991; 21: 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berne, C. J., Mikkelsen, W. P. Management of perforated peptic ulcer. Surgery 1958.

  8. Donovan, A. J., Vinsin, T. I., Gilbert, O. M., Maulsby, G. O., Gewin, J. R. Selective treatment of duodenal ulcer with perforation. Ann. Surg. 1979; 189: 627–636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barry, M. C., Gul, Y., Davies, M G., Long, J. P., Shine, M. F., Lennon, F. Acute peptic ulcer surgery in a district surgical unit. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 1996; 165: 109–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gul, Y.A., Shine, M.F. & Lennon, F. Non-operative management of perforated duodenal ulcer. Ir. J. Med. Sc. 168, 254–256 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944352

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944352

Keywords

Navigation