Skip to main content
Log in

Is repeat laparotomy of value in patients with suspected intra-abdominal sepsis in the intensive care unit?

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of patients with suspected post laparotomy intraabdominal sepsis poses a major therapeutic challenge to clinicians. The mortality is high and the optimal interventional modality remains ill-defined.

We define the incidence, diagnostic methodology, pre-and postoperative findings and outcome of patients going from the intensive care unit for a repeat laparotomy in search of abdominal sepsis over a one year period.

Fifteen patients were included with an overall mortality of 60 per cent. In 6 cases more than one relaparotomy was performed with a mortality of 50 per cent. Sepsis was found in 14 of the 15 cases with a mortality of 57 per cent and the patient with a normal relaparotomy died. The primary surgery was elective in 26 per cent of cases and the mortality was 50 per cent. All the non-survivors required mechanical ventilation, inotropic support and continuous veno-veno haemodialysis while the survivors required less organ support. Radiological assessment (ultrasound scan and CT scan) were no better at predicting an abnormal relaparotomy than clinical assessment.

Higher mortality rates were associated with increasing age and multi-system organ failure (p< 0.05).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bohmen, J., Bonlager, M., Meakins, J. Prognosis and generalized peritonitis. Arch. Surg. 1983; 118: 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hinsdale, J. G., Jaffe, B. M. Re-operation for intraabdominal sepsis. Ann. Surg. 1984; 199: 31–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delinger, E., Wertz, M., Meakins, J. Surgical infection stratification for intra-abdominal infection: multi-center trial. Arch. Surg. 1985; 120: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koehler, P., Knochil, Q. Computed tomography in the evaluation of abdominal abcesses. Am. J. Surg. 1980; 110: 1089–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Posteraro, R. H., Ravin, C. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in critically ill patients. Crit. Care Med. 1987; 9: 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christou, N. V., Barie, P. S. Surgical infection society intraabdominal infection study. Arch. Surg. 1993; 128: 193–199.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Polk, H. C. Jr., Fry, D. E. Radical peritoneal debridement for established peritonotis: the results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 1980; 192: 350–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinney, E. V., Polk, H. C. Jr. Open treatment of peritonitis: an argument against. Adv. Surg. 1987; 21: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maddaus, M. A., Simmons, R. L. Leave the abdomen open for peritonitis: yes, no, maybe? Adv. Surg. 1987; 21: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pusajo, J. E, Bumaschny, E. Postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis requiring reoperation. Value of a predictive index. Arch. Surg. 1993; 128: 218–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bunt, T. J. Urgent relaparotomy: the high risk no choice operation. Surgery. 1985; 98 No. 3: 555–560.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCrory, C., Crowley, K. Is repeat laparotomy of value in patients with suspected intra-abdominal sepsis in the intensive care unit?. I.J.M.S. 166, 88–91 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944195

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944195

Keywords

Navigation