Skip to main content
Log in

Toxikologische Bewertung von Ochratoxin A: Offene Fragen und Forschungsbedarf

  • Published:
Mycotoxin Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is an important food and feed contaminant with potential adverse effects in humans and animals. In view of present discussions on limit values for OTA in foods, essential elements of a toxicological risk assessment are outlined. The exposure situation in Europe is now well documented. The data base, with respect to a characterization of hazard and dose-response relationships, allowed to calculate a provisional tolerable daily intake for OTA suited to protect the consumer against undesirable toxic effects. Nonetheless, further research on OTA is indicated in view of unresolved issues regarding the following points:

  1. 1.

    mechanisms of action (mode of genotoxicity, role of bioactivation/metabolism, identification of DNA-adducts and dose-dependency);

  2. 2.

    combinations of OTA and other mycotoxins (studies of relevant mixtures/conditions);

  3. 3.

    individual susceptibility and/or situation-based vulnerability.

Better information on mechanistic aspects of mycotoxin-induced toxicities will further improve our knowledge on the “margin of safety” between a given exposure and a potential impairment of human health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Weber R (1999) Festsetzung von Höchstmengen für Mykotoxine in der EU. In: Proceedings des 21. Mykotoxin-Workshop Jena, pp. 153–155

  2. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (1993) Volume 56, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp. 489–521

  3. Tatu CA, Orem WH, Finkelman RB, Feder GL (1998) The etiology of Balkan endemic nephropathy: still more questions than answers. Environm Health Perspect 106: 689–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolff J, Bresch H, Cholmakow-Bodechtel C, Engel G, Erhardt S, Gareis M, Majerus P, Rosner H, Scheuer R (2000) Belastung des Verbrauchers und der Lebensmittel mit Ochratoxin A. Abschlussbericht (Teilaspekte der vom BMG geförderten Studie wurden beim 21. Mykotoxin-Workshop in Jena vorgestellt; vgl. Proceedings)

  5. Fuchs R, Hult K (1992) Ochratoxin A in blood and its pharmacokinetic properties. Food Chem Toxicol 30: 201–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Galtier P (1992) Pharmacokinetics of ochratoxin A in animals. IARC Sci Publ 115:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuiper-Goodman T, Scott PM (1989) Risk assessment of the mycotoxin ochratoxin A. Biomed Environm Sci 2: 179–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pohland AE, Nesheim S, Friedman L (1992) Ochratoxin A: a review. Pure & Appl Chem 64: 1029–1046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuiper-Goodman T (1996) Risk assessment of ochratoxin A: an update. Food Addit Contam 13, Suppl.: 53–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hohler D (1998) Ochratoxin A in food and feed: occurrence, legislation and mode of action. Z Ernährungswiss 37: 2–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dirheimer G (1998) Recent advances in the genotoxicity of mycotoxins. Rev Med Vet 149, 605–616

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillman IG, Clark TN, Manderville RA (1999) Oxidation of ochratoxin A by an Fe-porphyrin system: model for enzymatic activation and DNA cleavage. Chem Res Toxicol 12:1066–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Obrecht-Pflumio S, Chassat T, Dirheimer G, Marzin D (1999) Genotoxicity of ochratoxin A by Salmonella mutagenicity test after bioactivation by mouse kidney microsomes. Mutat Res 446:95–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Castegnaro M, Mohr U, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, Esteve J, Steinmann J, Tillmann T, Michelon J, Bartsch H (1998) Sex- and strain-specific induction of renal tumors by ochratoxin A in rats correlates with DNA adduction. Int J Cancer 77: 70–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Degen, G.H. (1999) Mycotoxins: research needs. In: WHO Consultation on Current Issues in Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Substances in Food of Animal Origin, December 6.–9. 1998, Hannover, Germany. Consensus Report published by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and training in Veterinary Public Health, Hannover, Germany, pp. 81–82

  16. Fink-Gremmels J (1999) Mycotoxins: their implications for human and animal health. Vet Q 21: 115–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Neumann HG, Thielmann HW, Gelbke HP, Greim H, Kappus H, Norpoth KH, Reuter U, Vamvakas S, Wardenbach P, Wichmann HE (1997) Vorschläge zur Änderung der Einstufung krebserzeugender Arbeitsstoffe. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 32: 298–304

    Google Scholar 

  18. Müller G, Kielstein P, Rosner H, Berndt A, Heller M, Köhler H (1999) Studies on the influence of combined administration of ochratoxin A, fumonisin B1, deoxynivalenol and T2 toxin on immune and defence reactions in weaner pigs. Mycoses 42:485–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dörrenhaus A, Flieger A, Golka K, Albrecht M, Degen GH, Föllmann W (2000) Induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in primary human urothelial cells by the mycotoxin ochratoxin A. Toxicol Sci 53: 271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Paolo N, Guarnieri A, Loi F, Sacchi G, Mangiarotti AM, DiPaolo M (1993) Acute renal failure from inhalation of mycotoxins. Nephron 64: 621–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hallier E, Bünger J, Bolt HM (2000) Tumorerkrankungsrisiken durch Mikroorganismen am Arbeitsplatz. Abschlussbericht Forschungsvorhaben F 1498, BAuA, Dortmund (im Druck)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisela H. Degen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Degen, G.H. Toxikologische Bewertung von Ochratoxin A: Offene Fragen und Forschungsbedarf. Mycotox Res 16 (Suppl 1), 117–122 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942997

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942997

Navigation