Skip to main content
Log in

Response of sugarcane varieties to application of nitrogen fixing bacteria under different nitrogen levels

  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field study was undertaken to evaluate the response of sugarcane varieties to application ofAzotobacter,Azospirillum andGluconacetobacter under different levels of fertilizer nitrogen.Azospirillum significantly improved the cane and sugar yield compared toGluconacetobacter, Azotobacter and uninoculated control.Gluconacetobacter andAzotobacter were on par.Gluconacetobacter was better than uninoculated control. There was differential response of varieties to Biofertilizers for cane yield and CCS per cent. Co 8014, Co 8122, Co 8021 and Co 6304 responded in terms of cane yield toAzospirillum while Co 8021 responded toGluconacetobacter and Co 6304 responded toAzotobacter. The response toAzospirillum in terms of cane yield was more under lower nitrogen level (200 kg ha-1) compared to normal nitrogen level (300 kg ha-1). Co 8122 showed a significant improvement in CCS per cent forAzotobacter, Azospirillum andGluconacetobacter, while CoC 85061 only toAzospirillum. Varieties Co 8014, Co 8021 and Co 6304 did not show any improvement in CCS percent for biofertilizers. Biofertilizers significantly improved the nitrogen content of stem at 200 and 300 kg N ha-1 compared to control. Biofertilizers did not influence the soil available nitrogen status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boddey, R.M. and Dobereiner, J. 1995. Nitrogen fixation associated with grasses and cereals: Recent progress and perspectives for the future.Fert. Res.,42: 241–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante, V.A. and Dobereiner, J. 1988. A new acid tolerant nitrogen fixing bacterium associated with sugarcane.Plant soil,108: 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere, S., Vanderleyden, J. and Okon, Y. 2003. Plant growth- promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere.Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.,22: 107–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A.C. and Mathur, R.S. 1966. Stimulating influence of humic substances on nitrogen fixation byAzotobacter.Sci. Cult.,32: 319.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James, E.K., Reis, V.M., Olivares, F.L., Baldani, J.I. and Dobereiner, J. 1994. Infection of sugarcane by the nitrogen-fixing bacteriumA. diazotrophicus.J. Exp. Bot.,45: 757–766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, E., Boddey, R.M. and Doberiener, J. 1987. Quantification of biological nitrogen fixation associated with sugarcane using a15N aided nitrogen balance.Soil Biol. Biochem.,19: 165–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, G.P., Chen, J.C.P. 1977.Cane Sugar Hand Book (10 ed.). Wiley Inter Science, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelraj, S., Srinivasan, T.R., and Naidu, K.M. 1984. Sugarcane nutrition through biofertilizers.Indian J. Pl. Nutrition,3: 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, A. and Naidu, K. M. 1990. Effect of biofertilizers and their method of application on nitrogen economy in sugarcane.Indian J. Agron.,35: 120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumarasamy, R., Revathi, G. and Solayappan, A.R. 1994. Biofertilizers — A supplement or substitute for chemical nitrogen for sugarcane crop.Coop. Sugar,25: 287–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumarasamy, R and Revathi, G. 1999. Diazotrophic associations in sugarcane cultivation in South India.Trop. Agric.(Trinidad),76: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, P.G. and Hapase, D.G. 1981. Nitrogen economy in sugarcane (Adsali) by use ofAzotobacter.Maharashtra Sugar,6: 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, C.S. 1950.Soil and Plant Analysis, Hans Publications, Bombay, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruschel, A.P. and Ruschel, R. 1977. Varietal differences affecting nitrogenase activity in rhizosphere of sugarcane.Proc. ISSCT,16: 141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V.P., Zaman, S. and Jha, K.C. 1985. Contribution ofAzotobacter chroococcum to the nitrogen needs of sugarcane in North Bihar.Maharashtra Sug.,10: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T.R. and Naidu, K.M. 1987. Response of sugarcane varieties to biofertilizers under different soil conditions.Sugarcane,3, 5–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Hari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hari, K., Srinivasan, T.R. Response of sugarcane varieties to application of nitrogen fixing bacteria under different nitrogen levels. Sugar Tech 7, 28–31 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942525

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942525

Key Words

Navigation