Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review and analysis of renewable feedstocks for the production of commodity chemicals

  • Session 4 Process Economics and Commercialization
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several biomass feedstocks were analyzed for their suitability in chemicals production by industry. Feedstocks included dedicated feedstock crops, industrial residuals, and conventional food crops. The factors that were examined included price of raw materials, degree of raw material preprocessing necessary, storage requirements, potential fermentable sugar yield, opportunities for waste minimization, level of technology base, crop hardiness, and land usage. The following conclusions were made: (1) the US has great potential for controlling the direction of a biomass-based chemicals industry because domestic supplies of raw feedstock materials are in excess of what is required for the production of many commodity chemicals, and (2) of the representative feedstocks that were analyzed, cellulosic industrial residuals and fermentable sugar-containing industrial residuals were the most promising prospects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. USDA (1992),Feed Situation and Outlook Report, Commodity Economics Division (FDS-322).

  2. USDA (1992),Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook Yearbook, Economic Research Service (SSRV17N2).

  3. Hawaii Sugar Planters’ Association (1991),Hawaii Sugar Manual 1991 (ISSN 1048-9428).

  4. Lynd, L. R., Cushman, J. H., Nichols, R.J., and Wyman, C. E. (1991),Science 251, 1318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. USDA (1987), NewFarm and Forest Products: Responses to the Challenges and Opportunities Facing American Agriculture, New Farm and Forest Products Task Force, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Technical Insights, Inc. (1991),Biomarkets: 43 Market Forecasts for Key Product Areas, Fort Lee, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Russell, M., Colglazier, E. W., and Tonn, B. E. (1992),Environment 34(6), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stavins, R. N. and Whitehead, B. W. (1992),Environment 34(7), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leeper, S. A., Ward, T. E., and Andrews, G. F. (1991),Production of Organic Chemicals via Bioconversion: A Review of the Potential, EG&G Idaho, Inc., Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID.

    Google Scholar 

  10. USDA (1991),Agricultural Statistics, Washington, DC.

  11. EG&G Idaho, Inc. (1981),Assessment of Biomass as an Alternate Energy Source, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID.

    Google Scholar 

  12. USDA (1992),Agricultural Resources: Agricultural Land Values and Markets Situation and Outlook Report, Economic Research Service (AR-26).

  13. Anonymous (1992),Chemical Marketing Reporter,JL27,28.

  14. Electric Power Research Institute (1991),Biomass State-of-the-Art Assessment, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bergez, J.-E., Bouvarel, L., and Auclair, D. (1991),Biores. Technol. 35, 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. USDA (1992),Agricultural Resources: Crop, Plant, Water, and Conservation Situation and Outlook Report, Economic Research Service (AR-27).

  17. US Department of Energy (1993),Alternative Feedstocks Program Technical and Economic Assessment: Thermal/Chemical and Bioprocessing Components, Office of Industrial Technologies (in press).

  18. Wright, L. L. (1992),Biofuels Feedstock Development Program: Dedicated Feedstock Supply Systems, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, personal communication.

  19. Salunkhe, D. K., Kadam, S. S., and Jadhav, S. J. (1991),Potato: Production, Processing, and Products, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Office of Technology Assessment (1991),Biotechnology in a Global Economy, Congress of the United States (S/N 052-003-01258-8).

  21. Wright, L. L., Cushman, J. H., Ehrenshaft, A. R., McLauglin, S. B., McNabb, W. A., Ranney, J. W., Tuskan, G. A., and Turhollow, A. F. (1992),Biofuels Feedstock Development Program: Annual Progress Report for 1991, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (#ORNL-6742).

  22. Teunissen, M. J. and Vogels, G. D. (1992),Abstracts: 14th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wayman, M., Chen, S., and Doan, K. (1992),Proc. Biochem. 27, 239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Almosnino, A. M. and Belin, J. M. (1991),Biotechnol. Lett. 13, 893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Watson, S. A. and Ramstad, P. E. (1987),Corn: Chemistry and Technology, American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Battelle Memorial Institute (1983),Agriculture 2000: A Look at the Future, Columbus Division, Battelle Press, Richland, WA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Biotechnology, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, EG&G Idaho, Inc., 83415-2203, Idaho Falb, ID

    Kevin Polman

Authors
  1. Kevin Polman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polman, K. Review and analysis of renewable feedstocks for the production of commodity chemicals. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 45, 709–722 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941842

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941842

Index Entries

Search

Navigation