Abstract
Effects of a common heavy metal (zinc) on activated sludge were studied with a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Organic removal in activated sludge was postulated to proceed by a rapid adsorption of organics on the sludge, followed by a slower metabolic assimilation mechanism. Metal-laden waste water at a subtoxic level affected the SBR performance to different extents depending on the hydraulic retention time (HRT). Heavy metal acted as a strong competitor for active sites on the sludge, hampering organic adsorption, and affected the COD reduction efficiency under a short HRT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lester, J. N., Harrison, R. M., and Perry, R. (1979),Sci. Total Environ. 12, 25–34.
Cooke, J. A., Andrews, S. M., and Johnson, M. S. (1990),Water Air Soil Pollut. 51, 43–54.
Deniseger, J., Erickson, J., Austin, A., Roch, M., and Clark, M. J. R. (1990),Water Res. 24 (4), 403–416.
Lamb, A. and Tollefson, E. L. (1973),Water Res. 7, 599–613.
Suthirak, S. and Sherrard, J. H. (1981),J. WPCF. 53 (8), 1314–1332.
Sawyer, C. N. and McCarty, P. L. (1978), inChemistry for Environmental Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, pp. 514–520.
Tan, K. N. and Chua, H. (1995), COD adsorption capacity of the activated sludge—its determination and application in the activated sludge process, presented in the 5th Symposium on Our Environment, September 12–15, 1995, Singapore.
Tan, K. N. (1993) The effect of heavy metals on the activated sludge process. Master Thesis, National Univeristy of Singapore.
Chambers, B. (1993),Water Sci. Technol. 28, 251–258.
Ng, K. Y. (1993), Sequencing batch reactor treatment of combined sewage, Ph.D. Thesis, National University of Singapore.
APHA (1992), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chua, H., Hua, F.L. Effects of a heavy metal (zinc) on organic adsorption capacity and organic removal in activated sludge. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57, 845–849 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941764
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941764