Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative paradigms for research in instructional systems

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bangert, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1983). Individualized systems of instruction in secondary dary schools. Review of Educational Research, 53, 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilby, A. (1980). Determining instructional costs through functional cost analysis. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(2), 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borich, G. D., & Jemelka, R. P. (1982). Pregrams and systems: An evaluation perspective. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. J. (1982a). Instructional design: Present strengths and limitations, and a view of the future. Educational Technology, 22(10), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. J. (1982b). A comment on the training of students in instructional systems design. Educational Technology, 22(8), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for New Schools. (1974). You can talk to the teachers: Student-teacher relations in an alternative high school, Chicago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasiexperimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1976) Evaluation research in education: Theory, principles and practice. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, P. (1979). Cost-effectiveness analysis trade-offs and pitfalls for planning and evaluating instructional programs. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 17, 23–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. P., & Tessmer, M. (In press). The rational set generator: A method for creating concept examples for teaching and testing. Educational Technology.

  • Golbmeier, H., & Good, T. L. (1979). The effects of instructing teachers about good teaching on the mathematics achievement of fourth grade students. American Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. In L. S. Shulman (ed.), Review of Research on Education (Vol. S. pp. 351–379). Itasca, Ill.: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golas, K. C. (1982). The effectiveness and cost of alternate models of formative evaluation for printed instructional materials. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University. Also presented at the Annual Meeting of the AREA. Montreal, Canada, 1983.

  • Grabe, M., & Latta, R. M. (1981). Cumulative achievement in a mastery instructional system: The impact of differences in resultant achievement motivation and persistence. American Educational Research Journal, vol. 18(10), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. A monograph prepared for the Center for Studies in Evaluation, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Hannafin, M. J. (1983). Fruits and fallacies of instructional systems: Effects of an instructional systems approach on the concept attainment of Anglo and Hispanic students. American Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. A., & Schutz, R. E. (1978). A new look at schooling effects from programmatic research and development. In D. Mann (Ed.), Making change happen. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, R. (1970). Technology and the management of instruction. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. J. (1984). Instructional and incidental learning with instructional texts: A meta-analysis for 1970–1980. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., & Doughty, P., (1980). Cost-effectiveness evaluation: A case study of an innovative program in higher education. Journal of Instructional Development. 3(3), 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1979). A metaanalysis of outcome studies of Keller’s Personalized Systems of Instruction. American Psychologist, 34(4), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 525–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. (1979). A model for applying cost-effectiveness analysis to decisions involving the use of instructional technology.

  • Reiser, R. A., & Gagne, R. M. (1983) Selecting media for instruction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, R. C. (1977). Overview. On the relations among educational research paradigms: From disdain to detente. Anthropology and Educational Quarterly, 8(2), 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D. P. (1981). Educational inquiry as developmental research. Educational Researcher, March, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, W. H. (1980). Recalibrating educational research: Toward a focus on practice. Educational Researcher, January, 17–24, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (1977). The use of ethnographic techniques on educational research. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 245–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Driscoll, M.P. Alternative paradigms for research in instructional systems. Journal of Instructional Development 7, 2–5 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02938551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02938551

Keywords

Navigation