Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the effects of acetophenone, 1-hexanol, and hexane ons. cerevisiae and z.mobilis in batch and continuous immobilized-cell culture

Scientific note

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Both S.cerevisiae and Z.mobilis were found to be capable of producing ethanol from glucose in both batch and continuous cultures in the presence of low concentrations of acid-recovery solvents in the medium. However, Z.mobilis seemed to be more sensitive to the solvents when the concentrations were high or when two or more solvents were present in the medium. Among the three solvents tested, 1-hexanol had the most inhibitory effects, followed by acetophenone and then hexane. This order agrees will with the order of solubility in aqueous medium.

In comparing the continuous ICR with the batch reactor, it was found that the ICR yielded significantly higher volumetric productivities and tolerated higher concentrations of solvents. Low concentrations of solvents in the feed medium may, in fact, help to alleviate cell overgrowth, thereby increasing column longevity.

The limiting concentrations of solvents in the medium for both batch and immobilized-cell reactors are summarized in Table 4. The limiting concentration in batch culture was estimated as the maximum concentration permitting complete glucose uptake in a period not exceeding twice the time for complete conversion without solvent. The limiting concentration in the continuous ICR was estimated as the maximum allowable concentration not resulting in a decrease in volumetric productivity. Each of these values was estimated from the available data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chibata, I., Tosa, T., and Sato, T. (1983),Adv. Biotechnol. Proc. 1, 203–222.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Linko, P., Sorvari, M., and Linko, Y. Y. (1983),Annals NY Acad. Sci.. 413, 424–434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers, P. L., Lee, K. J., Skotnicki, M. L., and Tribe, D. E. (1982),Adv. Biochem. Eng. 23, 37–84.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, J. E., and Ollis, D. F. (1986),Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York), p. 384.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Montenecourt, B. S. (1985),Biology of Industrial Microorganisms (Demain, A. L. and Solomons, N. A., eds.), BenJaminJCummings, Menlo Park, CA, p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lawford, H. G. (1988),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 17, 203–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Waldron, R. D., Vega, J. L., Clausen, E. C, and Gaddy, J. L. (1987),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 18, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vega, J. L., Wu, J. J., Boyer, L. J., Clausen, E. C, and Gaddy, J. L. Paper presented at the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Annual Meeting, New York, November, 1987.

  9. Vega, J. L., Clausen, E. C, and Gaddy, J. L. (1987),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 29, 429–435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, P. L., Lee, K. J., and Tribe, D. E. (1980),Process Biochem. 15(6), 7–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill, C. O., and Ratledge, C. (1972),J. Gen. Microbiol. 72, 165–172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vega, J. L., Navarro, A. R., Clausen, E. C, and Gaddy, J. L. (1987),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 29, 633–638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Waldron, R. D. (1987), MS thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis, L. J. (1987), MS thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, J.J., Clausen, E.C. & Gaddy, J.l. A comparison of the effects of acetophenone, 1-hexanol, and hexane ons. cerevisiae and z.mobilis in batch and continuous immobilized-cell culture. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28, 797–808 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02922650

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02922650

Index Entries

Navigation