Skip to main content
Log in

Recycling of process streams in ethanol production from softwoods based on enzymatic hydrolysis

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In ethanol production from lignocellulose by enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, it is desirable to minimize addition of fresh-water and waste-water streams, which leads to an accumulation of substances in the process. This study shows that the amount of fresh water used and the amount of waste water thereby produced in the production of fuel ethanol from softwood, can be reduced to a large extent by recycling of either the stillage stream or part of the liquid stream from the fermenter. A reduction in fresh-water demand of more than 50%, from 3 kg/kg dry raw material to 1.5 kg/kg dry raw material was obtained without any negative effects on either hydrolysis or fermentation. A further decrease in the amount of fresh water, to one-fourth of what was used without recycling of process streams, resulted in a considerable decrease in the ethanol productivity and a slight decrease in the ethanol yield

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vallander, L. and Eriksson, K. E. (1990),Adv. Biochem. Eng/Biotech. 42, 63–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Katzen, R. and Fowler, D. E. (1994),Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 45/46, 697–707.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lynd, L. R., Cushman, J. H., Nichols, R. J., and Wyman, C. E. (1991),Science 251, 1318–1323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grethlein, H. E. and Converse, A. (1991),Biores. Technol. 36, 77–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schell, D. J., Torget, R., Power, A., Walter, P. J., Grohmann, K., and Hinman, N. D. (1991),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ramos, L. P., Breuil, C., and Saddler, J. N. (1992),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 34/35, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mackie, K. L., Brownell, H. H., West, K. L., and Saddler, J. N. (1985),J. Wood Chem. Technol 5(3), 405–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eklund, R., Galbe, M., and Zacchi, G. (1995),Bioresour. Eng. 52, 225–229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mamers, H. and Menz, D. N. J. (1984),Appita 37(8), 644–649.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, T. A. and Mackie, K. L. (1987),J. Wood. Chem. Technol. 7(3), 373–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwald, W., Smaridge, T., Chan, M., Breuil, C., and Saddler, J. N. (1989), Enzyme Syst. Lignocellul. Degrad., [Proc. Workshop Prod., Charact. Appl. Cellul.-, Hemicellul.-LigninDegrading Enzyme Syst.], 231–242. Coughlan, M. P., ed., Elsevier, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sinitsyn, A. P., Clesceri, L. S., and Bungay, H. R. (1982),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 7(6), 455–458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mes-Hartree, M. and Saddler, J. N. (1983),Biotechnol. Lett. 5(8), 531–536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dekker, R. F. H. (1988),Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 593–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark, T. A. and Mackie, K. L. (1984),J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 34B, 101–110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Palmqvist, E., Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Galbe, M., and Zacchi, G. (1995),Enzym. Microbiol. Technol. 19, 470–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galbe, M. and Zacchi, G. (1993), Biotechnology in Agriculture 9, Saddler, J. N., CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 291–321.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Palmqvist, E., Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Galbe, M., Larsson, M., Stenberg, K., Szengyel, Z., Tengborg, C., and Zacchi, G. (1996)Biores. Technol. 58, 171–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Larsson, M., Galbe, M., and Zacchi, G. (1997),Biores. Technol.,60, 143–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hägglund, E. (1951), inChemistry of Wood, Academic, New York.

  21. Mandels, M., Andreotti, R., and Roche, C. (1976)Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 6, 21–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berghem, L. E. R. (1974),Eur. J. Biochem. 46, 295–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanchez, B. and Bautista, J. (1988),Enzyme Microb. Technol. 10, 315–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Boyer, L. J., Vega, J. L., Klasson, K. T., Clausen, E. C., and Gaddy, J. L. (1992),Biomass Bioenergy 3(1), 41–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Maiorella, L. J., Blanch, H. W., and Wilke, C. R. (1983),Biotechnol Bioeng. 25, 103–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Linden, T., Peetre, J., and Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (1992),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58(5), 1661–1669.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Buchert, J., Puls, J., and Poutanen, K. (1989),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 20/21, 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nevado, J., Navarro, A., and Heredio, G. F. (1994),Yeast 10, 59–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramos, L. P., Breuil, C. and Saddler, J. N. (1993),Enzyme Microb. Technol. 15, 19–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Busche, R. M. (1983),Biotech. Bioeng. Symp. 13, 597–615.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stenberg, K., Tengborg, C., Galbe, M. et al. Recycling of process streams in ethanol production from softwoods based on enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 70, 697–708 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920181

Index Entries

Navigation