Skip to main content
Log in

Benchmark results on the linearized equations of motion of an uncontrolled bicycle

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present the linearized equations of motion for a bicycle as, a benchmark The results obtained by pencil-and-paper and two programs are compaied The bicycle model we consider here consists of four rigid bodies, viz a rear frame, a front frame being the front fork and handlebar assembly, a rear wheel and a fiont wheel, which are connected by revolute joints The contact between the knife-edge wheels and the flat level surface is modelled by holonomic constiaints in the normal direction and by non-holonomic constraints in the longitudinal and lateral direction The rider is rigidly attached to the rear frame with hands free from the handlebar This system has three degrees of freedom, the roll, the steer, and the forward speed For the benchmark we consider the linearized equations for small perturbations of the upright steady forward motion The entries of the matrices of these equations form the basis for comparison Three diffrent kinds of methods to obtain the results are compared pencil-and-paper, the numeric multibody dynamics program SPACAR, and the symbolic software system AutoSim Because the results of the three methods are the same within the machine round-off error, we assume that the results are correct and can be used as a bicycle dynamics benchmark

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Besscling, J F, 1964, “The Complete Analogy Between the Matrix Equations and the Continuous Field Equations of Stiuctural Analysis,” inInternational Symposium on Analogue and Digital Techniques Applied to Aeronautics Proceedings, Presses Académiques E.uropéennes, Bruxelles, pp 223–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Caivallo, M E, 1901, “Théorie du mouvement du Monocycle et de la Bicyclette,”Journal de L’Ecole Polytechnique, Series 2, Part 1, Volume 5, “Cerceau et Monocyle,” 1900 pp 119–188, Part 2, Volume 6, “Théorie de la Bicyclette,” pp 1–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, J P, 1948,Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York and London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dohring, E, 1955, “Stability of Single-Track Vehicles,” (Translated by J Lotsof, March 1957) Technical leport, Institut für Fahrzeugtechnik, Technische Hochschule Biaunschweig, Forschung Ing-Wes 21(2), pp 50–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, R S, 1988,Comparisons and Stability Analysis of Linearized Equations of Motion for a Basic Bicycle Model, MSc Thesis, Cornell Univ ersity

  • Jonker, J B, 1988, A Finite Element Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Spatial Mechanisms and Manipulators, PhD Thesis, Delft University Press, Delft

  • Jonker, J B and Meijaard, J P, 1990, “SPACAR — Computer Program for Dynamic Anaysis of Flexible Spatial Mechanisms and Manipulator,” inMultibody Systems Handbook, W Schiehlen (ed), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 123–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T R, 1968,Dynamics, Holt, Rmehart and Winston, New York

  • Kane, T R, 1975, “Fundamental Kinematic Relationships for Single-Track Vehicles,”International Journal for Mechanical Sciences 17, pp 499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F, and Sommerfeld, A, 1897,Über die Theorie des Kreisels, (Chapter IX, Section 8, “Stabilitat des Fahrrads,” 1910, pp 863–884), Teubner, Leipzig

  • Meijaaid, J P, 1991, “Direct Determination of Periodic Solutions of the Dynamical Equations of Flexible Mechanisms and Manipulators,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 32, pp 1691–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neimaik, Ju I and Fufaev, N A, 1972,Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems, (Translated from the Russian edition, Nauka, Moscow, 1967), A M S, Providence RI

  • Papadopoulos, J M, 1987, “Bicycle Steering Dynamics and Self-Stability. a Summary Report on Work in Progress,”Technical report, Cornell Bicycle Research Project, pp 1–23 (availabe at http //tam Cornell edu/ruina/hplab/bicycles html)

  • Rankine, W J M, 1869, “On the Dynamical Principles of the Motion of Velocipedes,”The Engineer, 28, pp 79, 129, 153, 175

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of Automotive Engineers, 2001, “Vehicle Dynamics Terminology-SAE J670e,” 2007SAE Handbook, SAE international, Wanendale, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, M W, 1991, “Symbolic Computer Language for Multibody Systems,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14, pp 1153–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, M W, 1991, “Symbolic Vector/Dyadic Multibody Formalism for Tree-Topology Systems,”Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 14, pp 1240–1250

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, A L and Meijaard, J P, 2003, “Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems with Non-Holonomic Constraints A Finite Element Approach,”Multibody System Dynamics 10, pp 107–123

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, A L, 2002,Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems, Ph D Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft

  • Schwab, A L and Merjaard, J P, 1999, “The Belt, Gear, Bearing and Hinge as Special Finite Elements for Kinematic and Dynamic Analysis of Mechanisms and Machines,” in Lemonen, T (ed),Proceedings of the Tenth World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, IFToMM, June 20–24, 1999, Oulu, Finland, Oulu University Press, Vol 4, pp 1375–1386

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, A L and Meijaard, J P, 1999, “Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems having Rolling Contact Application of the Wheel Element to the Dynamics of Road Vehicles,”Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement 33, pp 338–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, R S, 1971, “The Stability and Control of Motorcycles,”Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 13(5), pp 316–329

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, G L, Jr, 1990 Common Lisp, The Language, 2nd ed, Digital Press, USA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Timoshenko, S and Young, D H, 1948, Advanced Dynamics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Werff, K., 1977,Kinematic and Dynamic Analysis of Mechanisms, a Finite Element Approach. Ph D Thesis, Delft University Press, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, D H, 1972,Motorcycle Handling Dynamics and Rider Control and the Effect of Design Configuration on Response and Performance, Ph D Thesis, University of California, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, D H and Zellner, J W, 1978, “Lateral-Dnectional Motorcycle Dynamics and Rider Control,” Technical report 780304, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, F J W, 1899, “The Stability of the Motion of a Bicycle,”The Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 30, pp 312–348

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. L. Schwab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwab, A.L., Meijaard, J.P. & Papadopoulos, J.M. Benchmark results on the linearized equations of motion of an uncontrolled bicycle. J Mech Sci Technol 19 (Suppl 1), 292–304 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916147

Key Words

Navigation