Abstract
Passivation of commercial copper anodes and pure copper has been previously analyzed by performing electrochemical measurements. Chronopotentiometry results revealed four characteristic regions involving I—active dissolution, II—prepassivation, III—passivation onset, and IV—passivation, for commercial copper anodes, while only active dissolution was observed for pure copper under the conditions employed. In order to establish the relationship between surface morphology and passivation response, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were applied to characterize morphology of the product layers formed on a commercial copper anode surface for the distinctive electrochemical regions. The morphology studies suggested that the formation and stability of copper oxide surface films are critical to the onset and development of passivation. The structure and porosity of the slimes layer present in the outer layer of the anode influence the stability of copper oxide surface films which dominantly control the passivation response.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Abe, B.W. Burrows, and V.A. Ettel:Can. Metall Q., 1980, vol. 19, pp. 289–96.
T.T. Chen and J.E. Dutrizac:The Electrorefining and Winning of Copper, J.E. Hoffmann, R.G. Bautista, V.A. Ettel, V. Kudryk, and R.J. Wesely eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1987, pp. 499–525.
T.T. Chen and J.E. Dutrizac:Metall. Trans. B, 1989, vol. 20B, pp. 345–61.
T.T. Chen and J.E. Dutrizac:JOM, 1990, vol. 42, pp. 39–44.
T.T. Chen and J.E. Dutrizac:Hydrometallurgy and Electrometallurgy of Copper, Proc. Copper 91-Cobre 91 Int. Symp., W.C. Cooper, D.J. Kemp, G.E. Lagos, and K.G. Tan, eds., Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1991, vol. III, pp. 369–89.
X. Cheng and J.B. Hiskey:Metall. Trans. B, 1996, vol. 27B, pp. 610–16.
C. Compère, E. Fréchette, and E. Ghali:Hydrometallurgy and Electrometallurgy of Copper, Proc. Copper 91-Cobre 91 Int. Symp., W.C. Cooper, D.J. Kemp, G.E. Lagos, and K.G. Tan, eds., Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1991, vol. III, pp. 355–67.
J.P. Demaerel:The Electrorefining and Winning of Copper, J.E. Hoffmann, R.G. Bautista, V.A. Ettel, V. Kudryk, and R.J. Wesely, eds., TMS Warrendale, PA, 1987, pp. 195–209.
E.A. Kucharska-Giziewicz, and D.J. MacKinnon: Division Report No. MSL 92-47 (78TR) Mineral Sciences Laboratories, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1992.
S. Jin and E. Ghali:Can. Metall. Q., 1993, vol. 32, pp. 305–19.
E. Mattsson and J.O’M. Bockris:Trans. Faraday Soc., 1959, vol. 55, pp. 1586–2001.
J.C. Minotas, H. Djellab, and E. Ghali:J. Appl. Electrochem., 1989, vol. 19, pp. 777–83.
F. Noguchi, T. Nakamura, Y. Ueda, and N. Matsumoto:Metall. Rev. MMIJ, 1988, vol. 5, pp. 39–54.
F. Noguchi, N. Iida, and T. Nakamura:Hydrometallurgy and Electrometallurgy of Copper, Proc. Copper 91-Cobre 91 Int. Symp., W.C. Cooper, D.J. Kemp. G.E. Lagos, and K.G. Tan, eds., Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1991, vol. III, pp. 391–404.
J.D. Scott:Metall. Trans. B, 1990, vol. 21B, pp. 629–35.
S. Garneau, E. Ghali, M. Girgis, and R.G. Barradas:Metall. Trans. B, 1991, vol. 22B, pp. 623–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, X., Hiskey, J.B. Fundamental studies of copper anode passivation during electrorefining: Part II. Surface morphology. Metall Mater Trans B 27, 610–616 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915659
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915659