Abstract
Background Ethical approval of research projects is, appropriately, an essential prerequisite in health settings.
Aims This paper outlines difficulties encountered with procedures for gaining ethical approval for two multicentre surveys in Ireland.
Methods The experiences of two national surveys were documented.
Results Delays in processing ethics applications led to substantial delays in both surveys. Research ethics committees (RECs) assessed applications in an idiosyncratic manner.
Conclusion In Ireland, there is currently no accepted mechanism for single location ethical approval for multicentre studies. Instead, they require separate approval from all participating centres. The challenges of this system of application to multiple committees are outlined in this paper, and possible solutions presented.
References
External Advisory Group (EAG) of the Cell Factory Key Action. From Medical Biotechnology to Clinical Practice - Report of a Workshop organised under the aegis of the Cell Factory Key Action. Quality of Life Programme, European Commission, Research Directorate General, Brussels, 2000.
Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.Official Journal of the European Communities 2001; L121: 34–44 http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/en/archive/2001/l_12120010501en.html (accessed 13 January, 2004).
Singer EA, Mullner M. Implications of the EU directive on clinical trials for emergency medicine.BMJ 2002; 324: 1169–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, M., Doyle, F., McGee, H. et al. Ethical approval for national studies in Ireland: An illustration of current challenges. Ir J Med Sci 173, 72–74 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914559
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914559