Skip to main content
Log in

Hemolysis after mitral valve replacement with mechanical valve prostheses

  • Published:
The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated effects of type, size, and orientation of mechanical mitral valve prostheses on hemolysis.Methods: Subjects were 84 patients who had undergone mitral valve replacement. Lactate dehydrogenase was mainly used as a marker of hemolysis and was measured before surgery, 1 month after surgery, and in the late postoperative period.Results: Valves used included 16 Medtronic-Hall, 32 St. Jude Medical, and 36 CarboMedics valves. Medtronic-Hall valves caused less hemolysis than St. Jude Medical or CarboMedics valves in the late postoperative period. This resulted because hemolysis due to Medtronic-Hall valves was more severe 1 month after surgery than in the late postoperative period and because hemolysis due to St. Jude Medical or CarboMedics valves was more severe in the late postoperative period than 1 month after surgery. One reason for this finding is that cardiac output was greater in the late postoperative period than 1 month after surgery, making regurgitation through the pivots of bileaflet valves more severe. The orifice area and the orientation of prostheses did not affect hemolysis.Conclusion: St. Jude Medical or CarboMedics valves caused more severe hemolysis than Medtronic-Hall valves in the late postoperative period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azemoto R, Tsuchiya Y, Ai T, Murayama H, Nakagawa Y, Saisho H, et al. Does gallstone formation after open cardiac surgery result only from latent hemolysis by replaced valves? Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 2185–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Onizuka T, Nakamura K, Koga Y, A clinical study of chronic hemolysis after valve replacement with St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Jpn J Artif Organs 1991; 20: 994–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kronik G, Slany J, Mosslacher H, Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume. Circulation 1979; 60: 1308–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeCesare W, Rath C, Hufnagel C, Hemolytic anemia of mechanical origin with aortic-valve prosthesis. New Eng J Med 1965; 272: 15–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh JR, Starr A, Ritzmann LW, Intravascular hemolysis in patients with prosthetic valves and valvular heart disease. Circulation 1969; 39 (Suppl I): I-135–40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Merendino KA, Manhas DR, Man-made gallstones: a new entity following cardiac valve replacement. Ann Surg 19; 177: 694–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harrison EC, Roschke EJ, Meyers HI, Edmiston WA, Chan LS, Tatter D, et al. Cholelithiasis: a frequent complication of artificial heart valve replacement. Am Heart J 1978; 95: 483–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JW, Kim SH, Yoon CJ. Hemosiderin deposition on the renal cortex by mechanical hemolysis due to malfunctioning prosthetic cardiac valve: report of MR findings in two cases. J Computer Assist Tomography 1999; 23: 445–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yanai T, Aoyagi S, Isomura T, Ohishi K, Shimada S, Ishii H, et al. Observation of two leaflets motion of St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in mitral position and study on the possible causes of hemolysis in the postoperative periods. Jpn J Artif Organs 1985; 14: 1343–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yuda T, Morishita Y, Arikawa K, Toyohira H, Umebayashi Y, Saigenji H, et al. Intravascular hemolysis after prosthetic valve replacement. J Jpn Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 1990; 38: 270–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Skoularigis J, Essop MR, Skudicky D, Middlemost SJ, Sareli P. Frequency and severity of intravascular hemolysis after left-sided cardiac valve replacement with Medtronic Hall and St. Jude Medical prostheses, and influence of prosthetic type, position, size and number. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 587–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horstkotte D, Korfer R, Seipel L, Bircks W, Loogen F. Late complications in patients with Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement. Circulation 1983; 68 (Suppl. II), II-175–84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gencbay M, Degertekin M, Basaran Y, Yaymaci B, Izgi A, Dindar I, et al. Microbubbles associated with mechanical heart valves: their relation with serum lactic dehydrogenase levels. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 463–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuchman H, Feigenbaum H, Dillon JC, Chang S. Intracavitary echoes in patients with mitral prosthetic valves. J Clin Ultrasound 1975; 3: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mackay TG, Georgiadis D, Gosset DG, Lees KR, Wheatley DJ. On the origin of cerebrovascular microemboli associated with prosthetic heart valves. Neurol Res 1995; 17: 349–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Georgiadis D, Grosset DG, Kelman A, Faichney A, Lees KR. Prevalence and characteristics of intracranial microemboli signals in patients with different types of prosthetic cardiac valves. Stroke 1994; 25: 587–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dauzat M, Deklunder G, Aldis A, Rabinovitch M, Burte F, Bret PM. Gas bubble emboli detected by transcranial doppler sonography in patients with prosthetic heart valves: a preliminary report. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 129–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis JT, Wick TM, Yoganathan AP. Prosthesis-induced hemolysis: mechanisms and quantification of shear stress. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 376–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoganathan A, Woo Y, Sung H. Turbulent shear stress measurements in the vicinity of aortic heart valve prostheses. J Biomech 1986; 19: 433–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sung H, Cape E, Yoganathan A. In vitro fluid dynamic evaluation of the CarboMedics bileaflet heart valve prosthesis in the aortic and mitral positions. J Heart Valve Dis 1994; 3: 6–83.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nevaril CG, Lynch EC, Alfrey Jr. CP, Hellums JD. Erythrocyte damage and destruction induced by shearing stress. J Lab Clin Med 1968; 71: 784–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rambod E, Levy DJ, Child J, Milo S, Sahn DJ, Gharib M. Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast associated with mechanical valve closure: evaluation by TEE and an in-vitro comparison between two different mechanical bileaflet and a bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27 (Suppl A): 378A.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuwaki K, Takahashi N, Tanaka T, Abe T, Komatsu S. Clinical investigation of hemolysis using CarboMedics or St. Jude Medical prosthesis in mitral, aortic, and combined aortic and mitral position at relative early postoperative periods. Jpn Assoc Thorac Surg 1993; 13: 527–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ninomiya, M., Yagyu, K., Kaneko, Y. et al. Hemolysis after mitral valve replacement with mechanical valve prostheses. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49, 230–235 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02913521

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02913521

Key words

Navigation