Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of restored and natural seagrass beds near Corpus Christi, Texas

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structural equivalence between seagrass restoration sites and adjacent natural seagrass beds on the mid Texas coast was assessed six times between April 1995 and May 1997. Throw traps and corers were used for quantitative sampling. Restoration sites were 2.7 to 6.6 yr old when first sampled and 3.7 to 8.2 yr old when last sampled. There were few significant differences in water column, seagrass, or sediment characteristics, in fish and decapod (nekton) densities, or in nekton and benthos community compositions between restored and natural seagrass habitats at any time during the study period. Differences in densities of dominant benthic invertebrates were regularly observed, with greater densities of more taxa observed in natural seagrasses than in restored beds. Densities of Class Oligochaeta and the polychaetePrionospio heterobranchiata are proposed as potential indicators of structural equivalence in restored seagrasses. This study indicates that seagrass restorations in the vicinity of Corpus Christi, Texas, exhibit minimal quantitative differences in community structure (except for benthos) relative to adjacent natural seagrass beds after 3 to 5 yr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Altsman, D., R. DeMay, andL. Handley. 2004. Gulf of Mexico seagrass status and trends. Scientific Investigations Report. U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, Louisiana and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. S., L. A. J. Clements, andJ. Kurdziel. 1993. Production in natural and restored seagrasses: A case study of a macrobenthic polychaete.Ecological Applications 3:610–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Peterson, N. J., M. S. Peterson, D. A. Rydene, andR. W. Eames. 1993. Fish assemblages in natural versus well-established recolonized seagrass meadows.Estuaries 16:177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M. H., andM. A. Hixon. 1997. Artificial reefs: The importance of comparisons with natural reefs.Fisheries 22:28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure.Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R., andR. H. Green. 1988. Statistical design and analysis for a “biological effects” study.Marine Ecology Progress Series 46:213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, W. E. 1974. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: Comparison with other methods.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 44:242–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, T. andW. L. Kruczynski. 1992. Status and trends of emergent and submerged vegetated habitats, Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-800-R-92-003, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunton, K. H. 1990. Production ecology ofRuppia maritima L. s. l. andHalodule wrightii Aschers, in two subtropical estuaries.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 143:147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunton, K. H. 1994. Seasonal growth and biomass of the subtropical seagrassHalodule wrightii in relation to continuous measurements of underwater irradiance.Marine Biology 120: 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunton, K. H. andD. A. Tomasko. 1994. In situ photosynthesis in the seagrassHalodule wrightii in a hypersaline subtropical lagoon.Marine Ecology Progress Series 107:281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L. 1980. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Publishing Company, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, M. S. 1992. Restoring seagrass systems in the United States, p. 79–110.In G. W. Thayer (ed.), Restoring the Nation’s Marine Environment. UM-SG-TS-92-06. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, M. S., B. E. Julius, andW. J. Kenworthy. 2000. Integrating biology and economics in seagrass restoration: How much is enough and why?Ecological Engineering 15:227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, M. S., W. J. Kenworthy, D. R. Colby, K. A. Rittmaster, andG. W. Thayer. 1990. Comparisons of fauna among natural and transplanted eelgrassZostera marina meadows: Criteria for mitigation.Marine Ecology Progress Series 65:251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, M. S., W. J. Kenworthy, andF. X. Courtney. 1996a. Development of planted seagrass beds in Tampa Bay, Florida, U.S.A. I. Plant components.Marine Ecology Progress Series 132: 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, M. S., D. L. Meyer, andM. O. Hall. 1996b. Development of planted seagrass beds in Tampa Bay, Florida, U.S.A. II. Faunal components.Marine Ecology Progress Series 132:141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, M. S., W. J. Kenworthy, and G. Thayer. 1998. Guidelines for the conservation and restoration of seagrasses in the United States and adjacent waters. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 12, Silver Spring, Maryland.

  • Hair, C. A., J. D. Bell, andM. J. Kingsford. 1994. Effects of position in the water column, vertical movement and shade on settlement of fish to artificial habitats.Bulletin of Marine Science 55:434–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Jr.D. E. 1992. Characterization of open bay benthic assemblages of the Galveston Estuary and adjacent estuaries from the Sabine River to San Antonio Bay, p. 414–439.In C. Loeffler and A. Walton (eds.), Status and Trends of Selected Living Resources in the Galveston Bay System. GBNEP-19. Galveston Bay National Estuary Program, Houston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, Jr.K. L., C. Hays, andR. J. Orth. 2003. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows.Marine Ecology Progress Series 253:123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellier, Jr.,T. R. 1962. Fish production and biomass studies in relation to photosynthesis in the Laguna Madre of Texas.Publications of the Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Texas 8:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoese, H. D. andR. S. Jones. 1963. Seasonality of larger animals in a Texas turtle grass community.Publications of the Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Texas 9:37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, H. 1992. Large-scale restoration of seagrass meadows, p. 111–140.In G. W. Thayer (ed.), Restoring the Nation’s Marine Environment. UM-SG-TS-92-06. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushlan, J. A. 1981. Sampling characteristics of enclosure fish traps.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110:557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L. A., D. Talley, andG. Thayer. 1996. Succession of macrobenthos in a created salt marsh.Marine Ecology Progress Series 141:67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, III,R. R. 1989. Wetlands restoration/creation/enhancement terminology: Suggestions for standardization, p. 1–7.In J. A. Kusler and M. E. Kentula (eds.), Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Volume II: Perspectives. EPA 600/3-89/038b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A. andR. D. Kalke. 1992. The effect of freshwater inflow on meiofaunal and macrofaunal populations in the Guadulupe and Nueces estuaries, Texas.Estuaries 15:307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. 1972. Ecosystem theory in relation to man, p. 11–24.In J. A. Weins (ed.), Ecosystem Structure and Function. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J. andJ. van Montfrans. 1990. Utilization of marsh and seagrass habitats by early stages ofCallinectes sapidus: A latitudinal perspective.Bulletin of Marine Science 46:126–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Estuarine Research Laboratory. 1990. A manual for assessing restored and natural coastal wetlands with examples from southern California. T-CSGCP-021. California Sea Grant Publication, La Jolla, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulich, Jr.W. M. 1982. Edaphic factors related to shoalgrass (Halodule wrightii Aschers.) production.Botanica Marina 25: 467–475.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rountree, R. A. 1989. Association of fishes with fish aggregation devices: Effects of structure size on fish abundance.Bulletin of Marine Science 44:960–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rountree, R. A. 1990. Community structure of fishes attracted to shallow water fish aggregation devices off South Carolina, U.S.A.Environmental Biology of Fishes 29:241–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, P. 2004. Recovery of floral and faunal communities after placement of dredged material on seagrasses in Laguna Madre, TexasEstuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 59:441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, P., C. Henderson, andG. McMahan. 2003. Fauna of natural seagrass and transplantedHalodule wrightü (shoalgrass) beds in Galveston Bay, Texas.Restoration Ecology 11:139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, F. T., D. M. Burdick, C. A. Short, R. C. Davis, andP. A. Morgan. 2000. Developing success criteria for restored eelgrass, salt marsh, and mud flat habitats.Ecological Engineering 15:239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, F. T., andS. Wyllie-Echeverria. 1996. Natural and human-induced disturbance of seagrasses.Environmental Conservation 23:17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, E. G. 1957. A ecological survey of the upper Laguna Madre of Texas,Publications of the Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Texas 4:156–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, G. M. 1974. The distribution and abundance of penaeid shrimp in the lower Laguna Madre of Texas, with a description of the live bait fishery. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Technical Series 15. Austin, Texas.

  • Tunnell, Jr.,J. W., Q. R. Dokken, E. H. Smith, andK. Withers. 1996. Current status and historical trends of the estuarine living resources within the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program study area. Volume 1. CCBNEP-06A. Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheridan, P. Comparison of restored and natural seagrass beds near Corpus Christi, Texas. Estuaries 27, 781–792 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912040

Keywords

Navigation