Skip to main content
Log in

Autoconglomeration of limestone

  • Published:
Geosciences Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here-named “autoconglomerate” comprises rounded lime-mudstone clasts of various shape (spherical, prolate, discoidal, tabular, and irregular) and size (a few millimeters to 15 cm in long diameter). Autoconglomerate is mainly interbedded with ribbon carbonate (alternating limestone and dolomitic shale) and subordinately present in the upper part of fractured lime-mud-stone bed, which is gradational to lime-mudstone downwards and commonly capped by marly shale. We coin “autoconglomeration” for the formative process of autoconglomerate, which is most likely due to compaction, fluidization, and dewatering during consolidation. The rounding process (i.e., autoconglomeration) is probably enhanced by immiscibility and surface tension of lime-mud. Autoconglomeration is analogous to autobrecciation of limestone, but furthered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, R. L. and Jackson, J. A., 1987, Glossary of Geology (third edition). Alexandria Virginia, American Geological Institute, 1–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst, R. G. C., 1975, Carbonate sediments and their diagenesis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demicco, R. V. and Hardie, L. A., 1994, Sedimentary structures and early diagenetic features of shallow marine carbonate deposits. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Atlas Series 1, 1–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, N. P. and Choquette, P. W., 1990, Limestonethe sea floor diagenetic environment. In: Mcllreath, I. A. and Morrow, D. W. (eds.), Diagenesis. Geoscience Canada Reprint Ser. 4, 13–34.

  • Kennedy, W. J. and Garrison, R. E., 1975, Morphology and genesis of nodular chalks and hardgrounds in the Upper Cretaceous of southern England. Sedimentology, 22, 311–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, N. and Zijlstra, J. J. P., 1997, Differential early diagenetic low-Mg calcite cementation and rhythmic hardground development in Campanian-Maastichtian chalk. Sedimentary Geology, 109, 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanistreet, I. G. and Hughes, M. J., 1984, Pseudoconglomerate and re-examination of some paleoenvironmental controversies. Geology, 12, 717–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wignall, P. B. and Twitchett, R. J., 1999, Unusual intraclastic lime-stones in Lower Triassic carbonates and their bearing on the aftermath of the end-Permian mass extinction. Sedimentology, 46, 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Chough.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chough, S.K., Kwon, Y.K., Choi, D.K. et al. Autoconglomeration of limestone. Geosci J 5, 159–164 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910421

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910421

Key words

Navigation