Skip to main content
Log in

Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The two purposes of this investigation were: (a) to examine whether an association existed between stages of adopting regular mammography and decision-making constructs from the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, and (b) to determine whether any such associations would be found for each of the two ways of defining the stages-of-adoption. One method integrated past screening history with a report of future intention for screening; the other method used a single item with predetermined response categories. Data were from the baseline survey of 1,323 women aged 50–74 who were recruited as part of an intervention study through a local Health Maintenance Organization. Results showed that both ways of defining stages of adopting regular mammography were associated with decisional balance and processes-of-change. The method that integrated past history plus intention provided somewhat better discrimination among stages. Women who were labeled as being at “Risk of Relapse,” and those who said they waited for a “Provider’s Recommendation,” may be useful groups to add to the set of stages that have been employed so far by the TTM. In addition, a tendency to avoid the health care system in general was used as a process-of-change to complement the mammography-specific processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S: Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993,85:1644–1656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. White E, Urban N, Taylor V: Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.Annual Review of Public Health. 1993,14:605–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Costanza ME: Breast cancer screening in older women: Synopsis of a forum.Cancer. 1992,69:1925–1931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sickles EA, Kopans DB: Deficiencies in the analysis of breast cancer screening data.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993,85:1621–1624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mettlin C, Smart CR: Breast cancer detection guidelines for women aged 40 to 49 years: Rationale for the American Cancer Society reaffirmation of recommendations.CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1994,44:248–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller AB: Is routine mammography screening appropriate for women 40–49 years of age?American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1991,7:55–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodd GD: American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer.Cancer. 1992,69:1885–1887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bastani R, Marcus AC, Hollatz-Brown A: Screening mammography rates and barriers to use: A Los Angeles County survey.Preventive Medicine. 1991,20:350–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grady KE, Lemkau JP, McVay JM, Reisine ST: The importance of physician encouragement in breast cancer screening of older women.Preventive Medicine. 1992,21:766–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. King E, Rimer BK, Balshem A, Ross E, Seay J: Mammography-related beliefs of older women.Journal of Aging and Health. 1993,5:82–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P: Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.Preventive Medicine. 1990,19:279–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayer JA, Slymen D J, Jones JA, et al: Mammography knowledge and intentions among insured women.Preventive Medicine. 1992,21:8–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith RA, Haynes S: Barriers to screening for breast cancer.Cancer. 1992,69:1967–1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zapka JG, Stoddard A, Costanza ME, Greene HL: Breast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors. American Journal of Public Health. 1989,79:1499–1502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Curry SJ, Taplin SH, Anderman C, Barlow WE, McBride C: A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening.Preventive Medicine. 1993,22:350–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eng E: The Save Our Sisters Project: A social network strategy for reaching rural Black women.Cancer. 1993,72:1071–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Erwin DO, Spatz TS, Turturro CL: Development of an African-American role model intervention to increase breast self-examination and mammography.Journal of Cancer Education. 1992,7: 311–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fletcher SW, Harris RP, Gonzalez JJ, et al: Increasing mammography utilization: A controlled study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993,85:112–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rimer BK, Rensch N, King E, et al: Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older.Public Health Reports. 1992,107:369–380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zapka JG, Costanza ME, Harris DR, et al: Impact of a breast cancer screening community intervention.Preventive Medicine. 1993,22:34–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zapka JG, Harris DR, Hosmer D, et al: Effect of a community health center intervention on breast cancer screening among Hispanic-American women.Health Services Research. 1993,28:223–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayer JA, Kossman MK, Miller LC, et al: Evaluation of a media-based mammography program.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1992,8:23–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. United States Department of Health and Human Services:Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives, DHEW Publication No. (PHS) 91-50212. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Breen N, Kessler L: Changes in the use of screening mammography: Evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:62–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rakowski W, Rimer BK, Bryant SA: Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.Public Health Reports. 1993,108:605–624.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Champion V: Beliefs about breast cancer and mammography by behavioral stages.Oncology Nurses Forum. 1994,21:1009–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stein JA, Fox SA, Murata PJ, Morisky DE: Mammography usage and the Health Belief Model.Health Education Quarterly. 1992,19:447–462.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Montano DE, Taplin SH: A test of an expanded theory of reasoned action to predict mammography participation.Social Science and Medicine. 1991,32:733–741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Toward a comprehensive model of change. In Miller WR, Heather N (eds),Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change. New York: Plenum, 1986, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. In Hersen M, Eisler RM, Miller PE (eds),Progress in Behavior Modification (Vol. 28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992, 184–218.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC: In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.American Psychologist. 1992,47:1102–1114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rakowski W, Dube CA, Goldstein MG: Considerations for extending the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change to screening mammography.Health Education Research: Theory and Practice (in press, 1996).

  33. Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP: Women’s decision-making about mammography: A replication of the relationship between stages-of-adoption and decisional balance.Health Psychology. 1993,12:209–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rakowski W, Dube CE, Marcus BH, et al: Assessing elements of women’s decisions about mammography.Health Psychology. 1992,11:111–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H: Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference?American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:40–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Based upon a presentation at the 1994 annual meeting of the Society for Behavioral Medicine, Boston, MA, April 1994.

About this article

Cite this article

Rakowski, W., Ehrich, B., Dubé, C.E. et al. Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption. Ann Behav Med 18, 91–100 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02909581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02909581

Keywords

Navigation