Skip to main content
Log in

An examination of cigarette brand switching to reduce health risks

  • Empirical Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

This study examined cigarette brand switching to reduce health risks in a population of young smokers (N=7,998) entering United States Air Force Basic Military Training. Because of a comprehensive tobacco ban during training, all smokers were abstinent during the study. Results from this investigation suggested that brand switching to reduce health risks was common among current smokers (31.3% of males; 32.3% of females). Brand switchers smoked fewer cigarettes, were more likely to smoke low-yield brands, had lower scores on a measure of nicotine dependency, and were more confident they could remain abstinent following training. Other discriminators of smokers who had switched brands from other smokers included using smoking to control appetite, greater proclivity to attempt smoking cessation, engaging in fewer safety risks, and healthier dietary composition. Finally, brand switchers quit smoking at a higher rate than other smokers (12.5% versus 11.1%) during the year following basic military training. However, a multivariate logistic regression model that controlled for demographic factors and smoking history suggested that brand switching was not a statistically significant predictor of smoking cessation during the follow-up period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oster G, Colditz GA, kelly NL: The economic costs of smoking and the benefits of quitting.Preventive Medicine. 1986,13:377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. United States Department of Health and Human Services.Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General, DHHS Publication No. (CDC) 89-8411. Rockville, MD: Centers for Disease Control, Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of Smoking and Health, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. United States Department of Health and Human Services:The Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation. A Report of the Surgeon General, DHHS Publication No. (CDC) 90-8416. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heckler MM:Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Black and Minority Health. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Department of Health and Human Services:Smoking, Tobacco, and Health, DHHS Publication No. (CDC) 87-8497. Washington, DC: U.S. Govement Printing Office, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control: Tobacco use among high school students—United States, 1997.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1998,47:229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson DE, Giovino GA, Shopland DR, et al: Trends in cigarette smoking among U.S. adolescents, 1974 through 1991.American Journal of Public Health. 1995,85:34–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control: Cigarette smoking cessation-United States, 1989.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1990,45:588–590.

    Google Scholar 

  9. West RR, Evans DA: Lifestyle changes in long-tern survivors of acute myocardial infarction.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1986,20:103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. United States Department of Health and Human Services:The Pharmacology of Tobacco Use: Nicotine Addiction: A Report of the Surgeon General, DHHS Publication No. (CDC) 88-8416. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abrams DB, Orleans CT, Niaura RS, et al: Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: A combined stepped-care and matching model.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1996,18:290–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glasgow RE, Klesges RC, Klesges LM, Vasey MW, Gunnarson DF: Long-term effects of a controlled smoking program: A 2 1/2 year follow-up.Behavior Therapy. 1985,16:303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hill D, Weiss DJ, Walker DJ, Jolley D: Long-term evaluation of controlled smoking as a treatment outcome.British Journal of Addition. 1988,83:203–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson RE, Stevens VJ, Hollis JF, Woodson GT: Nicotine chewing gum use in the outpatient care setting.Journal of Family Practice. 1992,34:61–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pierce JP, Gilpin E, Farkas AJ: Nicotine patch use in the general population: Results from the 1993 California Tobacco Survey.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1995,87:87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferguson T:The Smoker's Book of Health: How to Keep Yourself Healthier and Reduce Your Smoking Risks. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hedblad B, Ogren M, Isacsson SO, Janzon L: Reduced cardiovascular mortality risk in male smokers who are physically active.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1997,157:893–899.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moodie A:The Smoker's Guide to Vitamins and Health. Crofton, MD: Vanguard Books, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Warner KE, Slade J, Sweanor DT: The emerging market for long-term nicotine maintenance.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997,278:1087–1092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giovino GA, Tomar SL, Reddy MN, et al: Attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs about low-yield cigarettes among adolescents and adults. In U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,The FTC Cigarette Test Method for Determining Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide Yields of U.S. Cigarettes: Report of the NCI Expert Committee, National Institutes of Health Publication No. 96-4028. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1996, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman HP: Forward. In U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,The FTC Cigarette Test Method for Determining Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide Yields of U.S. Cigarettes: Report of the NCI Expert Committee, National Institutes of Health Publication No. 96-4028. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1996, iii-viii.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Federal Trade Commission:Staff Report on the Cigarette Smoking Advertising Investigation. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gallup Organization, Inc:The Public's Attitudes Toward Cigarette Advertising and Cigarette Tax Increase. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization, Inc., 1993, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Samet JM: The changing cigarette and disease risk: Current status of the evidence. In U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,The FTC Cigarette Test Method for Determining Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide Yields of U.S. Cigarettes: Report of the NCI Expert Committee, National Institutes of Health Publication No. 96-4028. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Benowitz NL: Health and public policy implications of the “low yield” cigarette.New England Journal of Medicine. 1989,320:1619–1621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guyatt AR, Kirkham AJT, Mariner DC, Baldry AG, Cummings G: Long-term effects of switching to cigarettes with lower tar and nicotine yields.Psychopharmacology. 1989,99:80–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lynch CJ, Benowitz NL: Spontaneous cigarette brand switching: Consequences for nicotine and carbon monoxide exposure.American Journal of Public Health. 1987,78:1191–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zacny JP, Stitzer ML: Cigarette brand-switching: Effects on smoke exposure and smoking behavior.Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 1988,246:619–627.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kanzler M, Jaffee JH, Nee J: Low nicotine cigarettes: Cigarette consumption and breath carbon monoxide after one year.Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 1983,34:408–415.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Khouw W, Pope MA: The misuse of “less-hazardous” cigarettes and its detection: Hole-blocking of ventilated filters.American Journal of Public Health. 1980,70:1202–1203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hughes JR: Applying harm reduction to smoking.Tobacco Control. 1995,4:S33-S38.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marlatt GA: Harm reduction: Come as you are.Addictive Behaviors. 1996,21:779–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Des Jarlais DC: Harm reduction—A framework for incorporating science into drug policy.American Journal of Public Health. 1995.85:10–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Duncan DF, Nicholson T, Clifford P, Hawkins W, Petosa R: Harm reduction: An emerging new paradigm for drug education.Journal of Drug Education. 1994,24:281–289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hughes JR: The future of smoking cessation therapy in the United States.Addiction. 1996,91:1797–1802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. National Center for Health Statistics:National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement. Public use data tape, 1987.

  37. Haddock CK, Klesges RC, Talcott GW, Lando H: Smoking prevalence and risk factors for smoking in a population of United States Air Force basic trainees.Tobacco Control. 1999,7:1005–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Snow MG: Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies.Psychological Bulletin. 1992,111: 23–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Williams CL, Eng A, Botvin GJ, Hill P, Wynder EL: Validation of student's self-reported cigarette smoking status with plasma cotinine levels.American Journal of Public Health. 1979,69:1272–1274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fagerstrom KO, Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT: Nicotine addiction and its assessment.Ear Nose and Throat Journal. 1992,69:763–767.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO: The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire.British Journal of Addiction. 1991,86:1119–1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kozlowski LT, Porter CQ, Orleans CT, Pope MA, Heatherton T: Predicting smoking cessation with self-reported measures of nicotine dependence: FTQ, FTND, and HSI.Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1994,34:211–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pomerleau CS, Carton SM, Lutzke ML, Flessland KA, Pomerleau OF: Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test of Nicotine Dependence.Addictive Behaviors. 1994,19:33–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S:Applied Logistic Regression, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Horm J, Anderson K: Who in America is trying to lose weight?Annals of Internal Medicine. 1993,119:672–676.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Levy AS, Heaton AW: Weight control practices of U.S. adults trying to lose weight.Annals of Internal Medicine. 1993,119:661–666.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Williamson DF, Serdula MK, Anda RF, Levy A, Byers T: Weight loss attempts in adults: Goals, duration, and rate of weight loss.American Journal of Public Health. 1992,82:1251–1257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by a grant awarded by the United States National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-53478).

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the United States Air Force Basic Military Training, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

The authors would like to thank Dr. Gary Giovino and Dr. Risa Stein for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. The authors would like to also thank the commanders and training instructors of USAF BMT for their strong support of this project.

About this article

Cite this article

Haddock, C.K., Talcott, G.W., Klesges, R.C. et al. An examination of cigarette brand switching to reduce health risks. ann. behav. med. 21, 128–134 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908293

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908293

Keywords

Navigation