Abstract
The influence of science in the recognition of the effects of landscape changes on coastal ecosystems and in the development of effective policy for managing and restoring these ecosystems is examined through four case studies: Chesapeake Bay, San Francisco Bay, the Mississippi Delta, and Florida Bay. These ecosystems have undergone major alterations as a result of changes in the delivery of water, sediments and nutrients from their watersheds. Both science and management have been challenged by the spatial, functional and temporal scale mismatches inherent in the watershed-coastal ecosystem relationship. Key factors affecting the influence of science on management include (1) sustained scientific investigation, responsive to but not totally defined by managers; (2) clear evidence of change, the scale of the change and the causes of the change; (3) consensus among the scientific communities associated with various interests; (4) the development of models to guide management actions; (5) identification of effective and feasible solutions to the problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon. 1994.Priorities for coastal ecosystem science. National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Anon. 1995.Science, policy, and the coast: Improving decisionmaking. National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Antweiler, R.C., Goolsby, D.A. & Taylor, H.E. 1995. Nitrates in the Mississippi River. In: Meade, R.H. (ed.)Contaminants in the Mississippi River, 1987–92, pp. 73–86. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1133, Denver, CO.
Boesch, D.F. 1995. Coastal ecosystem management: Challenges for science. In:Improving interactions between coastal science and policy, Proceedings of the Gulf of Maine Symposium. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Boesch, D.F., Armstrong, N.E., D’Elia, C.F., Maynard, N.G., Paerl, H.W. & Williams, S.L. 1993.Deterioration of the Florida Bay ecosystem: An evaluation of the scientific evidence. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Washington, DC.
Boesch, D.F., Josselyn, M.N., Mehta, A.J., Morris, J.T., Nuttle, W.K., Simenstad, C.A. & Swift, D.J.P. 1994. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana.J. Coastal Res. Special Issue 20: 1–103.
Boynton, W.R., Garber, J.H., Summers, R. & Kemp, W.M. 1995. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries.Estuaries 18: 285–314.
Carlton, J.T. & Geller, J.B. 1993. Ecological roulette: The global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms.Science 261: 78–82.
Cooper, S.R. 1995. Chesapeake Bay watershed historical land use: Impact on water quality and diatom communities.Ecol. Appl. 5: 703–723.
Cooper, S.R. & Brush, G.S. 1991. Long-term history of Chesapeake Bay anoxia.Science 254: 992–996.
Day, J.W., Jr. & Templet, P.H. 1989. Consequences of sea level rise: Implications from the Mississippi Delta.Coastal Manage. 17: 241–257.
D’Elia, C.F., Sanders, J.G. & Boynton, W.R. 1986. Nutrient enrichment studies in a coastal plain estuary: Phytoplankton growth in large-scale, continuous cultures.Can. J. Fish. Aquacul. Sci. 43: 397–406.
Eadie, B.J., McKee, B.A., Lansing, M.B., Robbins, J.A., Metz, S. & Trefry, J.H. 1994. Records of nutrient-enhanced coastal ocean productivity in sediments from the Louisiana continental shelf.Estuaries 17: 754–765.
Haas, P. 1990.Saving the Mediterranean: The politics of international cooperation. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
Hennessey, T.M. 1994. Governance and adaptive management for estuarine ecosystems: The case of Chesapeake Bay.Coastal Manage. 22: 119–145.
Howarth, R.W., Billen, G., Swaney, D., Townsend, A., Jaworski, N., Lajtha, K., Downing, J.A., Elmgren, R., Caraco, N., Jordan, T., Berendse, F., Freney, J., Kudeyarov, V., Murdoch, P. & Zhu, Z.-L. 1996. Regional nitrogen budgets and the riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences.Biogeochemistry.
Jassby, A.D., Kimmerer, W.J., Monismith, S.G., Armor, C., Cloern, J.E., Powell, T.M., Schubel, J.R. & Vendlinski, T.J. 1995. Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations.Ecol. Appl. 5: 272–289.
Jaworski, N.A. 1990. Retrospective of the water quality issues of the upper Potomac estuary.Aquatic Sc. 3: 11–40.
Kesel, R.H. 1989. The role of the Mississippi River in wetland loss in southeastern Louisiana, U.S.A.Envir. Geol. Water Sci. 13: 183–193.
Kimmerer, W.J. & Schubel, J.R. 1994. Managing freshwater flows into San Francisco Bay using a salinity standard: results of a workshop. In: Dyer, K.R. & Orth, R.J. (eds.)Changes in fluxes in estuaries: Implications from science to management, pp. 411–416. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg.
Lee, K.N. 1993. Greed, scale mismatch, and learning.Ecol. Appl. 3: 560–564.
Malone, T.C., Boynton, W., Horton, T. & Stevenson, C. 1993. Nutrient loading to surface waters: Chesapeake Bay case study. In: Uman, M.F. (ed.)Keeping pace with science and engineering, pp. 8–38. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
McIvor, C.C., Ley, L.A. & Bjork, R.D. 1994. Changes in freshwater inflow from the Everglades to Florida Bay including effects on biotic and biotic processing: A review. In: Davis, S.M. & Ogden, J.C. (eds.)Everglades: The ecosystem and its restoration, pp. 117–146. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL.
Meade, R.H. 1995. Setting: Geology, hydrology, sediments, and engineering of the Mississippi River. In: Meade, R.H. (ed.)Contaminants in the Mississippi River, 1987–92, pp. 13–28. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1133, Denver, CO.
Nichols, F.H., Cloern, J.E., Luoma, S.N. & Peterson, D.H. 1986. The modification of an estuary.Science 231: 567–573.
Rabalais, N.N., Turner, R.E., Wiseman, W.J., Jr. & Boesch, D.F. 1991. A brief summary of hypoxia on the northern Gulf of Mexico continental shelf: 1985–1988. In: Tyson, R.V. & Pearson, T.H. (eds.)Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia, pp. 35–47. Geological Society, London Special Publication No. 58.
Rabalais, N.N., Turner, R.E., Justi, D., Dortch, Q., Wiseman, W.J., Jr. & Sen Gupta, B.K. 1996. Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf.Estuaries 19: 386–407.
Roblee, M.B., Barber, T.B., Carlson, P.R., Jr., Durako, M. J., Fourqurean, J.W., Muehstein, L.M., Porter, D., Yabro, L.A., Zieman, R.T. & Zieman, J.C. 1991. Mass mortality of the tropical seagrassThalassia testudinum in Florida Bay (USA).Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 71: 297–299.
Sabatier, P.A. 1994. Alternative models of the role of science in public policy: Applications to coastal zone management. In:Improving interactions between coastal science and policy: Problems and opportunities, Proceedings of the California Symposium, pp. 69–80. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Smith, R.A., Alexander, R.B. & Wolman, M.G. 1987. Waterquality trends in the nation’s rivers.Science 235: 1605–1615.
Turner, R.E. & Rabalais, N.N. 1991. Changes in Mississippi River water quality this century.BioScience 41: 140–147.
Turner, R.E. & Rabalais, N.N. 1994a. Coastal eutrophication near the Mississippi river delta.Nature 368: 619–621.
Turner, R.E. & Rabalais, N.N. 1994b. Changes in the Mississippi River nutrient supply and offshore silicate-based phytoplankton community responses. In: Dyer, K.R. & Orth, R.J. (eds.)Changes in fluxes in estuaries: Implications from science to management, pp. 147–150. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg.
Walters, C. 1986.Adaptive ecosystem management of renewable natural resources. MacMillan, New York, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boesch, D.F. Science and management in four U.S. coastal ecossytems dominated by land-ocean interactions. J Coast Conserv 2, 103–114 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905196
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905196