Abstract
The success of tailored print communications depends upon having a sufficiently diverse inventory of both content messages and delivery formats to respond to important differences among individuals. This article discusses means by which this diversity— the variances of tailoring—may be developed. One of the foundations of tailoring is the definition of a “focal point” for intervention. A focal point is characterized by a simultaneous combination of variables which specify a population group of interest, a target health behavior, and a setting in which the behavior occurs. All persons defined by the focal point may receive some intervention in common (i.e. targeted intervention). Tailored content responds to individuals within the focal point, based upon the antecedents of behavior within that focal point. This article elaborates on the focal point concept and then discusses factors that contribute to variations of tailoring. The psychosocial resources required by health behaviors are also reviewed, because tailoring must prepare the individual to make changes specific to the nature of a particular health behavior. This article does not specify what the variations of tailoring should be; the potential diversity of tailored messages is too great. Instead, the article presents basic elements that will go into the development of tailored interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B: One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21(4):276–283.
Skinner CS, Campbell M, Rimer BK, Curry S, Prochaska JO: How effective is tailored print communication?Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21(4):290–298.
Rimer BK, Glassman B: Tailoring communications for primary care settings.Methods of Information in Medicine. 1998,37:171–178.
Abrams DA, Mills S, Bulger D: Challenges and future directions for tailored communication research.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21(4):299–306.
Gritz ER, Moon TE: The new cancer prevention and control.Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 1992,1:163–165.
Green LW, Kreuter MW, Deeds SG, Partridge KB:Health Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1980.
Green LW, Kreuter MW:Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach (2nd Ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1991.
Andreason AR:Marketing Social Change: Changing Behavior to Promote Health, Social Development, and the Environment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
Lefebvre RC, Flora J: Social marketing and public health interventions.Health Education Quarterly. 1988,15:299–315.
Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.
Bandura A:Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 1997.
Mischel W: Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality.Psychological Review. 1973,80:252–283.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC: In search of how people change: Applications to the addictive behaviors.American Psychologist. 1992,47:1102–1114.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. In Hersen M, Eisler RM, Miller PE (eds),Progress in Behavior Modification (Vol. 28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992, 184–218.
Azjen I: The Theory of Planned Behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991,50:179–211.
Azjen I, Fishbein M:Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
Montano DE, Kasprzyk D, Taplin SH: The Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 85–112.
Janz NK, Becker MH: The Health Belief Model: A decade later.Health Education Quarterly. 1984,11:1–47.
Kirscht JP: The Health Belief Model and illness behavior.Health Education Monographs. 1974,2:387–408.
Strecher VJ, Rosenstock IM: The Health Belief Model. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 41–59.
Rogers RW: Cognitive and physiological in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised Theory of Protection Motivation. In Cacioppo J, Petty R (eds),Social Psychophysiology. New York: Guilford Press, 1983.
Rogers RW: A Protection Motivation Theory of fear appeals and attitude change.Journal of Psychology. 1975,91:93–114.
Weinstein ND: The precaution adoption process.Health Psychology. 1988,7:355–386.
Finnegan Jr. JR, Viswanath K: Communication theory and health behavior change: The media studies framework. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds).Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 313–331.
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT:Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: W.C. Brown, 1981.
Fernandez E, Sheffield J: Relative contribution of life events versus daily hassles to the frequency and intensity of headaches.Headache. 1996,36:595–602.
Johnson JG, Bornstein RF: The revised Hassles Scale predicts psychopathology symptoms when pre-existing psychopathology is accounted for.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1993,8:123–128.
Rakowski W, Hickey T: Mortality and the attribution of health problems to aging among older adults.American Journal of Public Health. 1992,82:1139–1141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author wishes to acknowledge the contributions of Drs. Tracy Orleans, Matthew Kreuter, David Abrams, Celette Skinner, and Barbara Rimer, as well as comments by the reviewers and editor.
About this article
Cite this article
Rakowski, W. The potential variances of tailoring in health behavior interventions. ann. behav. med. 21, 284–289 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895959
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895959