Skip to main content
Log in

Risk and protective factors influencing adolescent problem behavior: A multivariate latent growth curve analysis

  • Empirical Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

This study examined the dynamic relations between adolescent problem behaviors (alcohol, marijuana, deviance, academic failure) over time and predictors of these behaviors. Data from the National Youth Survey (1) included 1,044 adolescents (53.5% male; mean age at year 1=13.20). Dependent measures were adolescent alcohol use, marijuana use, deviance, and academic failure, assessed annually over 4 years. Independent measures included age, gender, marital status, income, family time, family support, time with friends, friend deviance, knowledge of friends, activities, and neighborhood problems. An associative latent growth modeling (LGM) analysis showed significant increases and relations between the four behaviors in both initial status and development. Second-order multivariate LGM analyses indicated that the four behaviors could be modeled by a higher-order problem behavior construct. Significant effects on the common problem behavior intercept or slope included time with friends, deviant friends, age, marital status, family time, and support. Additional effects were found to be specific to the initial status and slopes of individual problem behaviors. Overall, results indicate the importance of assessing the relations between adolescent problem behaviors as they change over time and identifying the risk and protective factors that have both common and individual influences on these behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elliott DS: National Youth Survey [United States]: Wave I, 1976 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Behavioral Research Institute [producer], 1997; Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jessor R, Jessor SL:Problem Behavior and Psychosocial Development. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hops H, Tildesley E, Lichtenstein E, Ary D, Sherman L: Parent-adolescent problem-solving interations and drug use.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1990,16: 239–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Newcomb MD, Bentler PM: Impact of adolescent drug use and social support on problems of young adults: A longitudinal study.Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1988,97: 64–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Biglan A, Metzler CW, Wirt R, et al: Social and behavioral factors associated with high-risk sexual behavior among adolescents.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1990,13: 245–261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Donovan JE, Jessor R: Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1985,53: 890–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Farrell AD, Danish SJ, Howard CW: Relationship between drug use and other problem behaviors in urban adolescents.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992,60: 705–712.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawkins J, Catalano R, Miller J: Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention.Psychological Bulletin. 1992,112: 64–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Conger RD: The social context of substance abuse: A developmental perspective. In Robertson EB, Sloboda Z, Boyd GM, Beatty L, Kozel NJ (eds),Rural Substance Abuse: State of Knowledge and Issues.NIDA Research Monograph 168. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997, 6–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan SC, Duncan TE: A multivariate latent growth curve analysis of adolescent substance use.Structural Equation Modeling. 1996,3: 323–347.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Biglan A, Ary D: Contributions of the social context to the development of adolescent substance use: A multivariate latent growth modeling approach.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1998,50: 57–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan SC, Strycker LA, Duncan TE: Exploring associations in developmental trends of adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior in a high-risk population.Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1999,22: 21–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kandel DB, Kessler RC, Margulies RZ: Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis.Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1978,7: 13–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Newcomb MD, Maddahian E, Bentler PM: Risk factors for drug use among adolescents: Concurrent and longitudinal analyses.American Journal of Public Health. 1986,76: 525–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Osgood DW, Johnson LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG: The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood.American Sociology Review. 1988,53: 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patterson GR, Reid JB, Dishion TJ:A Social Learning Approach: IV. Antisocial Boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dishion TJ, Patterson GR, Reid JB: Parent and peer factors associated with early adolescent drug use: Implications for treatment. In Rahdert E, Grabowski J (eds),Adolescent Drug Abuse: Analyses of Treatment Research.NIDA Research Monograph 77. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988, 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brook JS, Whiteman M, Nomura C, Gordon AS, Cohen P: Personality, family, and ecological influences on adolescent drug use: A developmental analysis.Journal of Chemical Dependency Treatment. 1988,1: 123–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Montemayor R: Parents and adolescents in conflict: All families some of the time and some families most of the time.Journal of Early Adolescence. 1983,3: 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huber J: “Presidential Address: Macro-Micro Links in Gender Stratification.”American Sociological Review. 1990,55: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sampson RJ: Family management and child development: Insights from social disorganization theory. In McCord J (ed),Facts, Frameworks and Forecasts, Volume 3 of Advances in Criminological Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1992, 63–93.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McArdle JJ: Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In Cattell RB, Nesselroade J (eds),Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology (2nd Ed.). New York: Plenum Press, 1988, 561–614.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arbuckle JL:Amos for Windows. Analysis of Moment Structures. Version 3.5. Chicago: SmallWaters, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Li F: A comparison of model-and multiple imputation-based approaches to analyses with partial missingness.Structural Equation Modeling. 1998,5: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marsh H: The structure of masculinity/feminity: An application of confirmatory factor analysis to higher-order factor structures and factorial invariance.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1985,20: 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinberg L: Single parents, stepparents, and the susceptibility of adolescents to antisocial peer pressures.Child Development. 1987,58: 269–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Alpert A: Alcohol use among African-American and White siblings: A multilevel latent growth modeling approach.Journal of Gender, Culture and Health. 1998,3: 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by Grant DA09548 and Grant DA11942 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Grant AA11510 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The National Youth Survey was supported by Grant MH27552 from the National Institute on Metal Health.

About this article

Cite this article

Duncan, S.C., Duncan, T.E. & Strycker, L.A. Risk and protective factors influencing adolescent problem behavior: A multivariate latent growth curve analysis. ann. behav. med. 22, 103–109 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895772

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895772

Keywords

Navigation