Abstract
The genotype of breast cancer (BRC) is considered to be relatively stable during tumor progression, accordingly, determination of the estrogen receptor and HER-2/neu status is currently based on the primary tumor. However, recent data suggest that the gene expression profile of the metastatic lesion can be different compared to that of the primary BRC. Accordingly, it is possible that the HER-2/neu status is different in the metastatic lesion and the primary BRC. Since the bone is the most frequent metastatic site during the progression of BRC, we have analyzed the HER-2/neu status of 48 bone metastatic BRC cases by immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization, and it was possible to compare it to the primary site in 23 cases. The frequency of HER-2/neu amplification of BRC in the primary tumors was found to be 17.4% compared to 10.5% in bone metastases. Half of BRC cases with HER-2/neu amplification lost this genotype in bone metastases (4/23 versus 2/23, respectively) and even in the 2 cases where HER-2/neu amplification was retained in the metastases, the copy number was found to be decreased compared to the primary tumor. Based on our data and previous reports in the literature, we suggest to perform HER-2/neu testing both on primary tumor and samples obtained from BRC metastases, at least in case of primary tumors with HER-2/neu amplification, before introduction of HER-2/neu-targeting therapy. (Pathology Oncology Research Vol 12, No 3, 149–152)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mendelsohn J, Baselga J: The EGF receptor family as targets for cancer therapy. Oncogene 19: 6550–6565, 2000
Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, et al: Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177–182, 1987
Yu D, Hung MC: Overexpression of ErbB2 in cancer and ErbB2-targeting strategies. Oncogene 19: 6115–6121, 2000
Tsuda H, Hirohashi S, Shimotaso Y, et al: Correlation between long term survival in breast cancer patients and amplification of two putative oncogene co-amplification units: hst-1/int-2 and c-erbB-2/ear-1. Cancer Res 49:3104–3108, 1989
de Bono JS, Rowinsky EK: The ErbB receptor family: a therapeutic target for cancer. Trends Mol Med 8 (4 suppl): S19-S26, 2002
Ross JS, Fletcher JA: HER-2/neu (c-erb-B2) gene and protein in breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 112: 53–67, 1999
Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Triphaty D et al: Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER-2/NEU monoclonal antibody in woman who have HER-2/NEU-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 17: 2639–2648, 1999
Smith IE: Efficacy and safety of Herceptin®in women with metastatic breast cancer: Result from pivotal clinical studies. Anticancer Drugs 12(suppl4):S3-S10, 2001
Di Leo A, Dowsett M, Horten B, et al: Current status of HER-2/neu testing. Oncology 63(suppl 1): 25–32, 2002
Gancberg M, Di Leo A, Rouas G et al: Comparison of topoisomerase IIα (topoIIα) and HER-2 status between primary (P) breast cancer (BC) and corresponding metastatic (M) sites. Ann Oncol 13: 1036–1043, 2002
Fidler IJ: Review: biologic heterogeneity of cancer metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 9:17–26, 1987
Masood S, Bui MM: Assessment of Her-2/neu overexpression in primary breast cancers and their metastatic lesions: an immunohistochemical study. Ann Clin Lab Sci 30: 259–265, 2000
Shimizu C, Fukutomi T, Tsuda H et al: c-erbB-2 protein overexpression and p53 immunoreaction in primary and recurrent breast cancer tissues. J Surg Oncol 73: 17–20, 2000
Carlsson J, Nordgren H, Sjöström J et al: HER-2/NEU expression in breast cancer primary tumours and corresponding metastases. Original data and literature review. Br J Cancer 90: 2344–2348, 2004
Vincent-Salomon A, Jouve M, Genin P et al: HER-2/NEU status in patients with breast carcinoma is not modified selectively by preoperative chemotherapy and is stable during the metastatic process. Cancer 94: 2169–2173, 2002
Tanner M, Järvinen P, Isola J: Amplification of Her-2/neu and topoisomerase IIα in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 61:5345–5348, 2001
Kunitomo K, Inoue S, Ichihara F et al: A case of metastatic breast cancer with outgrowth of HER-2/NEU-negative cells after eradication of HER-2/NEU-positive cells by humanized anti-HER-2/NEU monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab) combined with docetaxel. Hum Pathol 35:379–381, 2004
Zidan J, Dashkovsky I, Stayerman C et al: Comparison of HER-2 overexpression in primary breast cancer and metastatic sites and its effect on biological targeting therapy of metastatic disease. Br J Cancer 93: 552–556, 2005
Latinovic L, Heinze G, Birner P et al: Prognostic relevance of three histological grading methods in breast cancer. Int J Oncol 19: 1271–1277, 2001
Press MF, Slamon DJ, Flom KJ et al: Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene amplification and overexpression: comparison of frequently used assay methods in a molecularly characterized cohort of breast cancer specimens. J Clin Oncol 20: 3095–3105, 2002
Bruun Rasmussen B, Kamby C: Immunohistochemical detection of oestrogen receptors in paraffin sections from primary and metastatic breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract 185:856–859, 1989
Woelfle U, Cloos J et al: Molecular signature associated with bone marrow micrometastasis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 63:5679–5684, 2003
Yoneda T: Cellular and molecular mechanism of breast and prostate can cer metastasis to bone. Eur J Cancer 34: 240–245, 1998
Gong Y, Booser DJ, Sneige N: Comparison of HER-2 status determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in primary and metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 103: 1763–1769, 2005
Regitnig P, Schippinger W, Lindbauer M et al. Change of HER-2/neu status in a subset of distant metastases from breast carcinomas. J Pathol 203: 918–926, 2004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lőrincz, T., Tóth, J., Badalian, G. et al. HER-2/neu genotype of breast cancer may change in bone metastasis. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 12, 149–152 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893361
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893361