Skip to main content
Log in

Indoor imitation experimental study on driving factors of rainfall-runoff process

  • Published:
Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The driving actions of rainfall-runoff process can be attributed to two aspects. The first is the influence of precipitation process, and the second is that of the ground pad. The research results of 179 indoor experiments conducted to imitate rainfall-runoff process indicate that both precipitation duration and intensity play important roles in affecting confluence lag time, which is obviously inconsistent with the traditional hypotheses. The nonlinear relationship is of great significance to the confluence curve especially when the precipitation duration is less than the total confluence time or the precipitation intensity is small. Therefore it can be concluded that the unit hydrograph (UH) can be applied to rainfall-runoff process imitation in the humid areas in the south China region. However, the UH application should be strictly modified in accordance with precipitation conditions in the arid and semiarid region of north China where the precipitation duration is short and the intensity is unstable. It will be hard to get ideal imitation results if the UH is applied blindly without considering specific conditions in the north China region. This also explains the unsatisfactory imitation results caused by using various hydrological models in the north China region. When the precipitation duration is short, and the watershed has not reached total watershed concentration, the characteristics of confluence change greatly, which reflects the actual situation in the north China region. Therefore necessary nonlinear corrections should be made when UH is applied. If the duration is longer than the total confluence time and the balance between pondage and discharge is stricken, the imitation research results will be applicable to both rainfall-runoff relation with longer duration in the south China region and the basic theoretical research on runoff generation and concentration. On conditions of adequate rainfall, peak discharge is in linear relationship with intensity, but has nothing to do with the ground pad. There is a negative linear relationship between intensity and time to peak. The amount of pondage capacity in a catchment is in linear relationship with intensity and peak discharge, with obvious influence by the ground pad status and interception, and it has nothing to do with the position of interceptions

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shen, J., Wang, W. Y., Shen, B., Experimental Study on Dynamic Hydrology (in Chinese), Xi’an: Shaanxi Science and Technology Publications, 1991, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eagleson, P. S., Dynamic Hydrology, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1970, 1–462.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, W. Z., Shao, M. A., Peng, X. D. et al., On the relationship between environmental aridization of the Loess Plateau and soil water in loess, Science in China, Ser. D, 1999, 42(3): 240- 249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xia, J., Theory and Method on Nonlinear Hydrology System (in Chinese), Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2002, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. F. Rogers., A practical model for linear and nonlinear runoff, Journal of Hydrology, 1980, 46(1): 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amorocho, J., The nonlinear prediction problems in the study of the runoff cycle, Water Resource Research, 1967, 3(3): 861–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amorocho, J., Brandstetter, A., Determination of nonlinear functional response functions in rainfall-runoff process, Water Resources Research, 1971, 7(5): 1087–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diskin, M. H., Nonlinear hydrologic models, In Rainfall-runoff relationship (ed. V. P. Singh, Littleton), Colo: Water Resources Publications, 1982, 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Izzard, C. F., A mathematical model for nonlinear hydrologic systems, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1966, 71(20): 4811-4824.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu X., Wen Z. R., Basic assumptions of unit graph method as checked by hydrological scale model experiments, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (in Chinese), 1959, 3: 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirkby M. J., Hillsolpe Hydrology, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978, 1–389.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fang X., Approach to an electrical measurement of low-discharge in the simulation experiment of rainfall-runoff, Geography Research (in Chinese), 1982, 1(2): 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, K., Liu C. M., Three instruments used in rainfall-runoff simulation experiments, Hydrological Process, 1988, 2: 151–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng, Y., A study on the variable isochrone method for flood computation, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (in Chinese), 1981, 4: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hua, S. Q., Wen, K., A study on the mathematical model of watershed flow concentration (I: linear model), Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (in Chinese), 1980, 5: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hua, S. Q., Wen, K., A study on the mathematical model of watershed flow concentration (II: nonlinear model), Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (in Chinese), 1980, 6: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hua, S. Q., A review on isochrone and unit hydrograph method, Water Resource and Hydropower Technology (in Chinese), 1963, 11: 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li, J. C., Introduction to Nash’s instantaneous unit hydrograph, Water Resource and HydroPower Technology (in Chinese), 1963, 4: 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hua, S. Q., Study on unit hydrograph, China Water Resources (in Chinese), 1957, 10: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Y. Ding, Variable unit hydrograph, Journal of Hydrology, 1974, 22: 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wen, K., Li, Q., A review of some aspects about flow concentration computations, Advances in Water Science (in Chinese), 1991, 2(1): 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, S. G., Huang, S. X., He, W. C. et al., A Study on the nonlinearity of unit hydrographs for small watersheds, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (in Chinese), 1981, 3: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Edited by Changjiang River Water Commission, Methodology of Hydrology Forecasting (in Chinese), Beijing: Water Resources and Hydropower Press of China, 1993, 144–145.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vijay, P. Singh., Hydrologic Systems Rainfall-Runoff Modeling (in Chinese), Zhengzhou: Yellow River Press, 1999, 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gill, M. A., Time lag solution of the Muskingum flood routing equation, gnNordic Hydrology, 1984, 15: 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, Q., Analysis and discussion related to the hydrological watershed models used in the first hydrological forecasting technology competition of China, Advances in Water Science (in Chinese), 1998, 9(2): 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, J. M., Proceedings of Hydrology Information and Forecasting (in Chinese), Zhengzhou: Yellow River Press, 2000, 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shifeng Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Liu, C., Xia, J. et al. Indoor imitation experimental study on driving factors of rainfall-runoff process. Sci. China Ser. D-Earth Sci. 48, 417–428 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888371

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888371

Keywords

Navigation