Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of pneumoconiosis interpretation between Chinese and American readers and classifications

  • Published:
Journal of Tongji Medical University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

As a preliminary step in joint Sino-American pneumoconiosis research efforts, a formal chest X-ray pneumoconiosis reading trial was conducted among Chinese and American radiologists. Tweleve Chinese readers from different institutions located in south central China used the 1986 Chinese Roentgenodiagnostic Criteria of Pneumoconioses. Three American radiologists, centified as NIOSH “B” readers, used the International Labour Office Classification of Pneumoconioses, The chest X-ray study set consisted of 150 posterior-anterior films. One-half were Chinese X-rays of silicaexposed workers, and the other half were American films of variously exposed workers but primarily coal miners. All readings were done independently. The results showed that the inter-reader variability among the Chinese was similar to that of the American readers, both being in an acceptable range. In addition, there was general agreement between the Chinese and American interpretations. For small opacity profusion, the Chinese readers tended to read slightly more diseases than their American counterparts, although there was exact agreement as to the major category in two-thirds of the films. Agreement for film quality, and pleural disease was less, but was not different from reported variation among American “B” readers. Overall, the results suggest that despite the use of two different classification systems, a valid correspondence exists between the Chinese and American Interpretations, which is suitable for use in epidemiologic research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rossiter CE. Initial repeatability trials of the UICC/Cincinnati classification of the radiographic appearances of pneumoconiosis. Br J Industr Med 1972;29:107

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rossiter CE, et al. Radiographic changes in chrysotile asbestos mine and mill workers of Quebec. Arch Environ Health 1972;24:388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan RH. Proficience examination of Physicians for classifying pneumoconiosis chest films. Am J Rad 1979; 132:803

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guidelines for the Use of ILO International Classification of Radiographs of pneumoconiosis. Revised ED 1980. International Labour office, Geneva

  5. Reger RB, et al. On the diagnosis of coalworker’s pneumoconiosis: Anglo American disharmony. Am Rev Respir Dis 1973;108:1186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Felson B, et al. Observations on the results of multiple readings of chest films in coal miners’ pneumocopniosis. Radiology 1973;109:19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reger RB, et al. On the factors influencing consistency in the radiologic diagnosis of pneumoconiosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1970;102:905

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ physchol Meas 1960;20:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang JQ, et al. A comparison of Chinese diagnostic standards of silicotic radiographs and international classification of radiography of pneumoconiosis. Ann Occup Hyg 1984;28:13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ducatman AM, et al. B-readers and asbestos medical surveillance. J Occup Med 1988;30:644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker DL, et al. Public health implications of the variability in the interpretation of “B” reading for pleural changes. J Occup Med 1989;31:775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hodous, T.K., Rong-an, C., Kinsley, K.B. et al. A comparison of pneumoconiosis interpretation between Chinese and American readers and classifications. Journal of Tongji Medical University 11, 225–229 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888156

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888156

Key words

Navigation