Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of shock and regular probation upon recidivism: A comparative analysis

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies of shock probation have reported mixed effects with regard to recidivism rates. This particular study compared the attributes of a sample of shock and regular probationers and discovered that type of probation was not significantly related to rearrest rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohlander, E. (1973)Shock probation; The use of and effectiveness of an early release alternative. Columbus, Ohio: Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, S. and Gottfredson, D. (1980) Screening for risk: A comparison of methods.Crim. Just, and Behavior, 7: 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faine, J.R. and Bohlander, E. (1976)Shock Probation: The Kentucky Experience. Bowling Green, Kentucky: Western Kentucky University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T.J. (1983) Correlates of institutional misconduct among state prisoners: A research note.Criminology, 21: 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friday, P.C., Petersen, D. M., and Allen, H.E. (1973) Shock probation: A new approach to crime control.Georgia J. of Corr., 1: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozuh, J., Guenther, R., Plattsmier, R., and Buckmaster, D. (1980)TAPC shock probation survey. Austin, TX: Texas Adult Probation Commission, Division of Information Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. H., Schuessler, K.F., and Costner, H.L. (1977)Statistical reasoning in sociology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, N. (1980) Combining incarceration and probation.Fed. Prob., 44: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, N. (1981) A taste of the bars.J. of Crim. Law and Crim., 7: 1109–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. (1977) Shock probation: A taste of prison.Corr. Mag., December: 49–55.

  • Petersen, D.M. and Friday, P.C. (1975) Early release from incarceration: Race as a factor in the use of shock probation.J. of Crim. Law and Crim., 66: 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. (1979) Stable predictors of recidivism.Criminology, 17: 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G.W., Holmes, R.M. and Revels, J. (1983) Shocked and scared: Prison as a deterrent?APPA Perspectives 7: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vito, G.F. and Allen, H.E. (1981) Shock probation in Ohio: A comparison of outcomes.Int. J. of Off. Ther. and Comp. Crim., 25: 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vito, G.F. and Allen, H.E. (1980) Shock probation in Ohio: The use of base expectancy rates as an evaluation method.Crim. Just. and Behavior, 7: 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vito, G.F. (1983) Developments in shock probation: A review of research findings and policy implications.Fed. Prob., 48: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vito, G.F. (1978) Shock probation in Ohio: A re-examination of the factors influencing the use of an early release program.Off. Rehab., 3: 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J.A. and Angelino, H.R. (1977) Shock probation: A natural experiment on the effect of a short period of incarceration.The Prison J., 57: 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vito, G.F., Holmes, R.M. & Wilson, D.G. The effect of shock and regular probation upon recidivism: A comparative analysis. AJCJ 9, 152–162 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887264

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887264

Keywords

Navigation