Skip to main content
Log in

Scales for perceived risk of student-on-student victimization in grades 7 through 10: A psychometric analysis of the adolescent index on school safety

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although past research has developed scales for the incidence, prevalence, and fear of student-on-student victimization (SSV), little is known about the scaling of perceived risk (i.e., the cognitive appraisal of the chances of experiencing SSV). Hence, this study examined self-report survey data for the perceived risk of SSV as measured in the Adolescent Index for School Safety (AISS). Children in grades 7 through 10 (n=337) in a single Florida public school completed the AISS. Factor analyses using Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Oblimin Rotation identified nine unique factors for perceived risk. Reliability analyses found standardized Cronbach Alphas that ranged from .64 to .91, and seven out of the nine identified scales were above .80, which suggested good to excellent internal consistency. Future research should examine the content validity, construct validity, and predictive validity for the AISS and other self-report surveys of SSV dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, V. (2004). Bullying and victimization: Cause for concern for both families and schools.Social Psychology of Education, 7(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbenishty, R., Astor, R. A. Zeira, A., & Vinokur, A. D. (2002). Perceptions of violence and fear of school attendance among junior high school students in Israel.Social Work Research, 26(2), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthold, K. A., & Hoover, J. H. (2000). Correlates of bullying and victimization among intermediate students in the Midwestern USA.School Psychology International, 21 (1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, K. S. (2003).The association between student perceptions of safety and academic achievement: The mediating influence of absenteeism. Working Paper and Technical Report Series (Number 2003–05). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, Department of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends regarding direct and indirect aggression.Aggressive Behavior, 18 (2), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children.Personality and Individual Differences, 24 (1), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment.Child Development, 66, 710–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization?”Developmental Psychology, 34, 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying.Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 17, 351–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. F. (1995).Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. F., & LaGrange, R. (1987). The measurement of fear of crime.Sociological Inquiry, 57(1), 70–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K., LaGrange, R., & Supancic, M. (1992). Perceived risk and fear of crime: Role of social and physical incivilities.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 29 (3), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, K. M. (1999). Violent victimization among America’s school children.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1055–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, E. L., Jr., & Hemmerle, W. J. (1966). Robustness of the maximum-likelihood estimation procedure in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 31, 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2000).SPSS for Windows-step by step: A simple guide and reference. Needham Heights, MA: Pearson, Allyn, & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983).Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998).Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1996). Victims of peer abuse: An overview.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 5(1), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence.Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, P., Chen, X., Choy, S. P., Chandler, K. A., Chapman, C. D., Rand, M. R., & Ringel, C. (1998).Indicators of school crime and safety-1998. NCES 98-251/NCJ-172215. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpela, A. (2000). Bullying at school: An indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders.Journal of Adolescence, 23, 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerbs, J. J., Rollin, S., Potts, I., and the FSU School Violence Prevention Project. (2002, 2003).The Adolescent Index for School Safety Form 2: Risk of Victimization. Tallahassee, FL: Center for Educational Research and Policy Studies, Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Mueller, C. W. (1978a).Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Mueller, C. W. (1978b).Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, R. (1974).The art of readable writing. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment?Child Development, 67, 1305–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). Victimized children’s responses to peers’ aggression: Behaviors associated with reduced versus continued victimization.Development and Psychopathology, 9(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpulainen, K., Rasanen, E., Henttonen, I., Almqvist, F., Kresanov, K., Linna, S., Moilanen, I., Piha, J., Puura, K., & Tamminen, T. (1998). Bullying and psychiatric symptoms among elementary school-age children.Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lab, S. P., & Whitehead, J. T. (1994). Avoidance behavior as a response to in-school victimization.Journal of Security Administration, 17 (2), 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, victimization: Distinct relational systems that contribute uniquely to children’s school adjustment?Child Development, 68, 1181–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Bjorkvist, K., & Pelotonen, T. (1988). Is direct aggression typical of females? Gender differences in 11-and 12-year-old children.Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaGrange, R. L., & Ferraro, K. F. (1989). Assessing age and gender differences in perceived risk and fear of crime.Criminology, 27, 697–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyznicki, J. M., McCaffree, M. A., & Robinowitz, C. B. (2004). Childhood bullying: Implications for physicians.American Family Physician, 70, 1723–1728.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. C. (2001). The effect of fear of sexual victimization on adolescent fear of crime.Sociological Spectrum, 21 (2), 141–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. C., & Dunaway, R. G. (2000). Predictors of fear of criminal victimization at school among adolescents.Sociological Spectrum, 20 (2), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (2002).OJJDP Youth violence research bulletin: Short-and long-term consequences of adolescent victimization. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale.Aggressive Behavior, 26 (2), 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, J. W., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment.The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1967).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention.” In R. D. Peters, R. J. McMahon, & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.),Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 100–125). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, R., & Lera, M-J. (2000). The Seville Anti-Bullying in School Project.Aggressive Behavior, 26, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, L. (1996). Sticks and stones and sugar and spice: Girls’ and boys’ aggression in schools.Australian Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 6(1), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, F., & Jackson, T. (1991). Fear of school-related predatory crime.Sociology and Social Research, 75(3), 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. G., Hodges, E. V. E., & Egan, S. K. (2001). Determinants of chronic victimization by peers: A review and a new model of family influence. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.),Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 73–104). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Slee, P. (1999). Australia. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.),The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, E. (2002). Bullying, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts.Educational Research, 44 (1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rountree, P. W., & Land, K. C. (1996). Perceived risk versus fear of crime: Empirical evidence of conceptually distinct reactions in survey data.Social Forces, 74, 1353–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions.Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G., James, A., & Smith, D. M. (1998). Bullying in schools: self reported anxiety, depression, and self-esteem in secondary school children.British Medical Journal, 317, 924–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. (2002).Problem-oriented guides for police series: Bullying in schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreck, C. J., Miller, J. M., & Gibson, C. (2003). Trouble in the school yard: A study of the risk factors of victimization at school.Crime & Delinquency, 49, 460–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. R., Dent, C. W., & Sussman, S. (1997). Vulnerability to victimization, concurrent problem behaviors, and peer influence as predictors of in-school weapon carrying among high school students.Violence and Victims, 12, 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, P. (1995). Peer victimization and its relationship to depression among Australian primary school students.Personality and Individual Differences, 18 (1), 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spark, G. G., Ogles, R. M., Vavrus, M., & Spirek, M. M. (1998, May).The difference between fear of victimization and the probability of being victimized: Toward conceptual clarity in studies of media cultivation effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Spector, P. E. (1992).Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretesky, P. B., & Hogan, M. J. (2001). Columbine and student perceptions of safety: A quasi-experimental study.Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K. (2000).The anti-bullying handbook. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (1998).Annual report on school safety: 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2003).Indicators of school crime and safety 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (1987). Fear of victimization and sensitivity to risk.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M., & Stafford, M. C. (1983). Fear of victimization: A look at the proximate causes.Social Forces, 61, 1033–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bully/victim problems in junior/middle and secondary schools.Educational Research, 35(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zradicka, G. (2004, September). Persistently dangerous school criteria.State notes: No Child Left Behind. Denver, CO: Educational Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Kerbs Ph.D..

Additional information

This publication was made possible by a grant [#97-MU-FX-KO12 (S-l)] from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (O.J.J.D.P.), United States Department of Justice (U.S.D.O.J.). This grant is administered through the Hamilton Fish National Institute on School and Community Violence at George Washington University. This specific study was developed and implemented by staff at: 1) East Carolina University’s Department of Criminal Justice; and 2) Florida State University’s Center for Educational Research and Policy Studies. All points of view and opinions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of East Carolina University, Florida State University, the Hamilton Fish National Institute on School and Community Violence, the O.J.J.D.P., or the U.S.D.OJ. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Bill Doerner and Jennifer Jolley for their support, editorial feedback, and insightful comments regarding earlier drafts of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerbs, J., Choi, K., Rollin, S. et al. Scales for perceived risk of student-on-student victimization in grades 7 through 10: A psychometric analysis of the adolescent index on school safety. Am J Crim Just 30, 121–141 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885885

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885885

Keywords

Navigation