Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of suspect gender in domestic violence arrests

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines heterosexual domestic violence incidents involving male and female suspects. The sample includes 428 incident reports filed at the Columbia (South Carolina) Police Department between 1993 and 1997. Police officers appear to use different arrest determinants for women than for men. The implications of these differential law enforcement practices are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avakame, E. & Fyfe, J. (2001). Differential police treatment of male-on-female spousal violence.Violence Against Women, 7, 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, O., Miller-Perrin, C., & Perrin, R. (1997).Family violence across the lifespan. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, D. & Mendelsohn, H. (1969).Minorities and the police. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R., Fenstermaker, S, & Newton, P. (1988). An empirical analysis of police responses to incidents of wife battering. In G. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. Kirpatrick, & M. Straus (Eds.),Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 158–168). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E. & Austin, T. (1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims.American Behavioral Scientist, 23, 610–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E. Austin, T., & Buzawa, C. (1995). Responding to crimes of violence against women: Gender differences versus organizational imperatives.Crime & Delinquency, 41, 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascardi, M., & Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences.Journal of Family Violence, 10, 265–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, V. N. (1996).I just lost myself: Psychological abuse of women in marriage. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (1978) Chivalry reexamined: Women and the criminal justice system. In L. Bowker (Ed.),Women, crime and criminal justice system (pp. 197–223). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S., Baumhover, L., Formby, W., & Clark-Daniels, C. (1999). Police discretion and elder mistreatment: A nested model of observation, reporting, and satisfaction.Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFleur, L. (1975). Biasing influences on drug arrest records: Implications for deviance research.American Sociological Review, 40, 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (1979).Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerner, W. G., Speir, J. C., & Wright, B. S. (1989). An analysis of rater-ratee race and sex influences upon field training officer program evaluations.Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayerherm, W. (1981). Gender differences in delinquency: Quantity and quality. In L. H. Bowker (Ed.),Women and crime in America (pp. 82–92). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, L. (1996). Police handling of domestic calls: The importance of offender’s presence in the arrest decision.Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 481–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. (1989). Policing woman battering.Social Problems, 36, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. I., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships.Journal of Family Violence, 5, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, J., Klinger, D., & Flavin, J. (1997). Differential police treatment of male on female spousal violence.Criminology, 35, 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. (1997).Intimate violence in families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, K. L. (1994). The intended function of domestic violence is different for arrested male and female perpetrators.Family Violence and Sexual Assault Bulletin, 10, 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, K. L. (1997). Female offenders in domestic violence: A look at actions in their context.Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 1, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarachal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (2000). Conflict and control: Images of symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.),Couples in conflict. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J.(2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., Peterson, R., & Wells, L. E. (1977). Arrest probabilities for marijuana users as indicators of selective law enforcement.American Journal of Sociology, 83, 568–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. (1999). Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters: Identifying a police decision-making model.Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G. (1999).“Broken windows” and police discretion. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, C. (1993).Leaving abusive partners: From the scars of survival to the wisdom for change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, D. (1994). Demeanor or crime? Why “hostile” citizens are more likely to be arrested.Criminology, 32, 475–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundman, R. (1974). Routine arrest practices: A commonwealth perspective.Social Problems, 22, 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundman, R. (1994). Demeanor or crime? The midwest city police citizen encounters study.Criminology, 32, 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundman, R., Sykes, R., & Clark, J. (1978). Police control of juveniles.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 15, 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1985). Domestic violence: A sociological perspective. In D. J. Sonkin, D. Martin, & L. E. A Walker (Eds.),The male batterer: A treatment approach (pp. 1–32). New York: Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski, S. D. (1990). The prospects of change in police patrol: A decade in review.American Journal of Police, 9, 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski, S. D., & Ritti, R. (1996). Police training and the effects of organization on drunk driving enforcement.Justice Quarterly, 13, 291–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (1989). Unintended side effects of pro-arrest policies and their race and class implications for battered women: A cautionary note.Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3, 299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. (1981). Race, rank, and police discretion.Journal of Police Science & Administration, 9, 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. (1990). A study of police discretion in six southern cities.Journal of Police Science & Administration, 17, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. (1971).The police and the public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennison, C, & Welchans, S. (2002).Intimate partner violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, C. M. (1992).Violent betrayal: Partner abuse in lesbian relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L., & Chandek, M. S. (2000). Differential police response to black battered women.Women & Criminal Justice, 12, 29–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, J. (1973).City police. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband abuse or self-defense?Violence & Victims, 1, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1996). Feminist-cognitive-behavioral and process-psychodynamic treatments for men who batter: Interactions of abuser traits and treatment model.Violence & Victims, 4, 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. D., & Yonkers, S. L. P. (1991). Officer satisfaction with police in-service training: An exploratory evaluation.American Journal of Police, 10, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealock, M., & Simpson, S. (1998). Unraveling bias in arrest decisions: The role of juvenile offender type-scripts.Justice Quarterly, 15, 427–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. & Klein, J. (1984). Police control of interpersonal disputes.Social Problems, 31, 468–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Visher, C. (1981). Street-level justice: Situational determinants of police arrest decisions.Social Problems, 29, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Visher, C., & Davidson, L. (1984). Equality and discretionary justice: The influence of race on police arrest decisions.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 75, 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis.Violence & Victims, 5, 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. A. (1989). Missing the mark? Police battering. InJ. Hanmer, J. Radford, & B. Stanko (Eds.),Women, policing and male violence (pp. 46–49). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys.Journal of Marriage & the Family, 48, 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind closed doors: Violence in American Families. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P. & Thoennes, N. (1998).Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2000).Census 2000 redistricting data (public law 94–171), summary file. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher, C. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry.Criminology, 21, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waaland, P., & Keeley, S. (1985). Police decision-making in wife abuse: The impact of legal and extralegal factors.Law & Human Behavior, 9, 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden, R., & Pollitz, A. (1984). Police arrests in domestic disturbances: A further look.Law & Society Review, 18, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden, R., & Shepard, R. (1996). Demeanor, crime, and police behavior: A reexamination of the police services study data.Criminology, 34, 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortley, R. (1990). The human factor in the decision to arrest.Police Studies, 13, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice, North Carolina Central University, 27707, Durham, NC

    Truc-Nhu Ho

Authors
  1. Truc-Nhu Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Truc-Nhu Ho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, TN. The influence of suspect gender in domestic violence arrests. Am J Crim Just 27, 183–195 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885693

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885693

Keywords

Search

Navigation