Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nucleoli and related nuclear structures

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Ahrens, W. 1939. Über das Auftreten von Nukleolenchromosomen mit endständigem Nukleolus in der Oogenese vonMytilicola intestinalis. Zeits. Wiss. Zool.152: 185–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alverdes, F. 1912. Die Kerne in den Speicheldrüsen derChironomus-Larve. Arch. Zellf.9: 168–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbiani, E. G. 1881. Sur la structure du noyau des cellules salivaires chez les larves deChironomus. Zool. Anz.4: 637–641, 662–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1883. Sur l'origine des cellules du follicule et du noyau vitellin de l'oeuf chez les Géophiles. Zool. Anz.6: 658–666, 676–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. 1933. Die wachsenden Oocytenkerne einiger Insekten in ihrem Verhalten zur Nuklealfärbung. Zeits. Zellf.18: 254–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1935. Der Aufbau der Chromosomen aus den Speicheldrüsen vonChironomus Thummi Kiefer. Zeits. Zellf.23: 280–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. A. 1941. Some criteria for judging the degree of polyploidy of cells in the resting stage. Am. Nat.75: 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, P. N. 1938. Root-tip smear technique and the differential staining of the nucleolus. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.58: 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. Cytological studies inOenothera with special reference to the relation of chromosomes to nucleoli. Proc. Roy. Soc. B128: 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1941a. Rapid smear methods with nucleolar stains. Chron. Bot.6: 319.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1941b. Cytological studies in the genusGaura. Ann. Bot. n. s.5: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, G. S. 1938. The cytology of some Indian wheats. Ann. Bot. n. s.2: 335–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, M. W. 1903. On the chromatin in the spermatocytes ofScolopendra heros. Biol. Bull.5: 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1905. On the karyosphere and nucleolus in the spermatocytes ofScolopendra subsinipes. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts & Sci.41: 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, W. 1840. On the minute structure and movements of voluntary muscle. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc.130: 457–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretschneider, L. H., andHirsch, G. C. 1937. Kernwachsthum und Nukleolengrösse bei den Eiern vonLima hians (Lamell.). Cytologia8: 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Ethel N. 1913. A study of the male germ cells ofNotonecta. Jour. Exp. Zool.14: 61–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderwood, W. L. 1892. A contribution to our knowledge of the ovary and intra-ovarian egg in Teleosteans. Jour. Mar. Biol. Assn. n. s.2: 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Camp, G. M. 1924. Le rôle du nucléole dans la caryocinèse somatique (Clivia miniata Reg.). La Cellule34: 5–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, E. E. 1913. The Mendelian ratio in relation to certain Orthopteran chromosomes. Jour. Morph.24: 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1931. The maturation divisions and segregation of heteromorphic homologous chromosomes in Acrididae (Orthoptera). Biol. Bull.61: 324–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, J. B. 1884. La biologie cellulaire. Étude comparée de la cellule dans les deux règnes. pp. 271.

  • Caspersson, T. 1939. Über die Rolle der Desoxyribosenukleinsaüre bei der Zellteilung. Chromosoma1: 147–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andSchultz, J. 1939. Pentose nucleotides in the cytoplasm of growing tissues. Nature143: 602–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,— 1940. Ribonucleic acids in both nucleus and cytoplasm, and the function of the nucleolus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.26: 507–515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside, D. G. 1932. The chromosomes of a new haploidOenothera. Cytologia4: 68–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. T. 1936. Observations on mitosis in Opalinids (Protozoa, Ciliata). II. The association of chromosomes and nucleoli. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.22: 602–607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claude, A. 1940. Particulate components of normal and tumor cells. Science91: 77–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. G. 1902. Karyokinesis and cytokinesis in the maturation, fertilization and cleavage ofCrepidula and other Gasteropoda. Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.12: 1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1912. Cell size and nuclear size. Jour. Exp. Zool.12: 1–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. G. 1941. Cell and protoplasm concepts: historical account. Publ. No. 14, Am. Assn. Adv. Sci. pp. 1–19.

  • Coleman, L. C. 1940. The cytology ofVeltheimia viridifolia Jacq. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 887–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey, H. I. 1940. Chromomere vesicles in Orthopteran cells. Jour. Morph.66: 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowdry, E. V. andKitchen, S. F. 1930. Intranuclear inclusions in yellow fever. Am. Jour. Hyg.11: 227–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, H. A., andS. W. Ransom. 1931. Ratio of cells to fibres and of myelinated to unmyelinated fibres in spinal nerve roots. Am. Jour. Anat.49: 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, W. H. 1934. The material continuity and individuality of the somatic chromosomes ofAmblystoma tigrinum with special reference to the nucleolus as a chromosomal component. Jour. Morph.56: 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay, L. 1926. Phylogenetische Chromosomeverkürzung. Zeits. Zellf.4: 338–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delay, C. 1940. Recherches sur le noyau des Légumineuses. Rev. Cytol. et Cytophysiol. Vég.4: 183–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloffre, G. 1939. Phénomènes traumatiques d'accroissement nucléaire chez le Lupin. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris208: 1110–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermen, H. 1933. Origin and behavior of the nucleolus in plants. Jour. Arn. Arb.14: 282–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, B. 1929. Entwicklung und Bau der Eier vonSalarius flavoumbrinus Rupp. Zool. Anz.83: 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, S. H. 1929. The reduction division in a haploidOenothera. La Cellule39: 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. 1939. Zytogenetische Untersuchungen anAntirrhinum majus L. Zeits. Bot.34: 81–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. Zytogenetische Untersuchungen an haploiden Pflanzen vonAntirrhinum majus L. I. Die Meiosis. Zeits. Bot.35: 161–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser, G. 1934. Cytological studies on egg fragments of the salamander Triton. V. Jour. Exp. Zool.68: 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faussek, W. 1913. Zur Frage über den Bau des Zellkernes in den Speicheldrüsen der Larve von Chironomus. Arch. Mikr. Anat.82: 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A. 1936. Les satellites chez les Narcisses. II. Les satellites pendant la mitose. Bot. Soc. Broteriana11: 87–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feulgen, R. 1924. Neue Wege zum biologisch-histologischen Studium der Zellkerne. Ber. Ges. Physiol.22: 489–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fikry, M. A. 1930. Phenomena of heterotypic division in the pollen mother cells of a tetraploid form ofRumex scutatus var.typicus. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.50: 387–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, G. M. 1932. Intranuclear bodies in the liver-cells of mice. Brit. Jour. Exp. Path.13: 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. 1934. Grössenveränderung von Kern und Nucleolus im Blattgewebe. Planta22: 767–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana. 1781. Traité sur le venin de la vipère avec des observations sur la structure primitive du corps animal.

  • Francini, E. 1939. A proposita del potere cromotropo del nucleolo. Nuovo Gior. Bot. Ital.45: 558–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortak, G. 1931. Die Cytologie der Keimung einer Zingiberacee und einer Piperacee. Bot. Arch.33: 97–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, M. S. 1927. Oogenesis inLimulus polyphemus, with special reference to the behavior of the nucleolus. Jour. Morph.44: 217–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatenby, J. B. 1922. The cytoplasmic inclusions of the germ cells. X. The gametogenesis ofSaccocirrus. Quart. Jour. Mikr. Sci.66: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. 1910. The material basis of Mendelian phenomena. Am. Nat.44: 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1912. Somatic mitosis inOenothera. Ann. Bot.26: 993–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. 1937. The discovery of the relation between the nucleolus and the chromosomes. Cytologia, Fujii Vol. pp. 977–986.

  • — 1938. The structure of the chromosome. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.58: 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. Nucleoli, satellites and sex chromosomes. Nature144: 794–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. 1942. Some observations regarding the nucleolus and cytoplasm in living marine eggs. Biol. Bull. [In press.]

  • —, andLatter, J. 1927. Observations on the pollen development of two species of Lathraea. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.47: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andPathak, G. N. 1938. Chromosome structure. Nature142: 156–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geitler, L. 1935. Neue Untersuchungen über die Mitosen vonSpirogyra. Arch. Protistenk.85: 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1935. Untersuchungen über den Kernbau vonSpirogyra mittels Feulgens Nuklealfärbung. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.53: 270–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersch, M. 1940. Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung der Nucleolen im Zellkern. Zeits. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat. A30: 483–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, T. H., andAvery, P. 1939. Trisomic and other types inNicotiana sylvestris. Jour. Genet.38: 381–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, K. 1903. Ueber den Nucleolen in reifenden Echinodermenei und seine Bedeutung. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Anat.19: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haga, T. 1934. The comparative morphology of the chromosome complement in the tribe Parideae. Jour. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. V.3: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammett, F. S. 1938. A correlation between sulfhydryl, mitosis and cell growth in length in roots ofPhaseolus vulgaris. Growth2: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, O. 1919. Über das Verhalten des Zell-, Kern- und Nucleolengrösse und ihre gegenseitigen Beziehungen bei Cladoceren während des Wachstums, des Generationscyclus und unter dem Einfluss aüsserer Faktoren. Arch. Zellf.15: 1–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilborn, O. 1939. Chromosome studies in the Cyperaceae. III–IV. Hereditas25: 224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz, E. 1925. Das Verhalten von Kern und Chloroplasten bei Regeneration. Zeits. Zellf.2: 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1931. Die Ursache der gesetzmässigen Zahl, Lage, Form und Grösse pflanzlicher Nukleolen. Planta12: 775–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1936. Die Nucleal-Quetschmethode. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.53: 870–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneguy, L. F. 1896. Leçons sur la cellule. pp. 541.

  • Van Herwerden, M. A. 1911. Ueber den Kernfaden und den Nucleolus in den Speicheldrüsenkernen der Chironomuslarve. Anat. Anz.38: 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hett, J. 1937a. Über den Anstritt von Kernsubstanzen in das Protoplasma. Zeits. Zellf.26: 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1937b. Weitere Befunde über den Austritt von Kernsubstanzen in das Protoplasma. Zeits. Zellf.26: 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillary, B. B. 1939. Use of the Feulgen reaction in cytology. I. Effect of fixatives on the reaction. Bot. Gaz.101: 276–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. II. New techniques and special applications. Bot. Gaz.102: 225–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, L. 1920. Parallel conjugation and the prophase complex in Periplaneta with special reference to the premeiotic telophase. Proc. Royal Soc. B91: 305–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. 1938. Über die Formveränderung der Randnukleolen der wachsenden Oozyten bei einem Knockenfisch mit besonderer Berücksichtigung auf die Frage über den Austritt der Nukleolarsubstanz ins Zytoplasma. Cytologia9: 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, N. K. 1939. Cytological investigations on the genusCicer. Ann. Bot. n. s.3: 271–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, K. T. 1940a. Chromosome catenation inOenothera. Bot. Gaz.102: 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1940b. Chromosome numbers and the relationship between satellites and nucleoli inCassia and certain other Leguminosae. Ann. Bot. n. s.4: 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1941. Certain abnormalities in the root tips of cotton. Current Sci.10: 174–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, M. 1913. Zellenstudien. I. Morphologische Beiträge zum Problem des Eiwachsthums. Arch. Zellf.10: 1–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B. P. 1934. Somatic mitoses ofDrosophila melanogaster. Jour. Morph.56: 125–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B. P. 1937. Morphology of the chromosomes ofDrosophila ananassae. Cytologia, Fujii Vol. pp. 1043–1055.

  • — 1938. Nucleolus-organizing regions in salivary gland chromosomes ofDrosophila melanogaster. Zeits. Zellf.28: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi, E. 1938. Der Einfluss der Eierbehandlung mit Zentrifugierung auf die Vererbung bei dem Seidenspinner. III. Beweise für die Beziehung der Geschlechtschromosomen zu den Nukleolen. Cytologia9: 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. L., andBeams, H. W. 1934. Somatic synapsis inChironomus, with special reference to the individuality of the chromosomes. Jour. Morph.56: 577–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruck, M. 1931. Physiologische und cytologische Studien über die Utriculariablase. Bot. Arch.33: 257–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudo, R. 1922. On the morphology and life history of a myxosporidian,Leptothece ohlmacheri, parasite inRana clamitans andR. pipiens. Parasitol.14: 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwada, Y., andSugimato, T. 1928. On the staining reactions of chromosomes. Protoplasma3: 531–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latter, J. 1926. The pollen development ofLathyrus odoratus. Ann. Bot.40: 277–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesley, M. M. 1938. The relation between satellite size and nucleolus in three races ofSolanum lycopersicum. Genetics23: 485–493.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levan, A. 1935. Cytological studies inAllium. VI. The chromosome morphology of some diploid species ofAllium. Hereditas20: 289–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. The cytology ofAllium amplectens and the occurrence in nature of its asynapsis. Hereditas26: 353–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. H. 1922. Endothelium in tissue cultures. Am. Jour. Anat.30: 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillie, F. R. 1912. Studies of fertilization III. IV. Jour. Exp. Zool.12: 413–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. E. 1940. Study of a nuclear and cytoplasmic relation inScyllina cyanipes (Orthoptera). Jour. Morph.67: 567–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loretti, F., andPerroncito, G. 1938. Ergastoplasma, caratteri nucleari e nucleolari, amitosi e mitose atipiche in parotidi iperattive diEpimys nucvegicus (var.albina) Erxl. Zeits. Zellf.28: 12–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, J. 1861. Notes on the generative organs and on the formation of the egg in the Annulosa. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc.151: 595–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, A. M. 1940. The cytology of fox encephalitis and the effects of centrifugation upon the intranuclear inclusions. Am. Jour. Path.16: 739–760.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M. S. 1930. Results obtained from applying the Feulgen reaction to Protozoa. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.27: 258–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andEvans, C. A. 1935. Correlation of qualitative microchemical tests in the protozoan nucleus and the mode of nutrition. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.55: 261–264.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ludford, R. J. 1922. The morphology and physiology of the nucleolus. Part I. The nucleolus in the germ-cell cycle of the molluscLimnaea stagnalis Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.1922: 113–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1924. Nuclear activity during melanosis, with special reference to melanin formation in a melanotic sarcoma. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.1924: 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1925a. Cell organs during secretion in the epididymus. Proc. Royal Soc. B98: 354–372.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1925b. Nuclear activity in tissue cultures. Proc. Royal Soc. B98: 457–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1928. The chromatin content of normal and malignant cells, as demonstrated by Feulgen's “Nuclealreaction.” Proc. Royal Soc. B102: 397–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. 1934. The relation of a particular chromosomal element to the development of the nucleoli inZea mays. Zeits. Zellf.21: 294–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, C. 1906. The behavior of the nucleoli during oogenesis of the dragon-fly, with special reference to synapsis. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Anat.23: 207–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, A. G. 1931. The morphology of the chromosomes inPisum sativum. Cytologia2: 318–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura, H. 1938. Chromosome studies onTrillium kamtschaticum Pall. VI. On the nucleolus-chromosome relationship. Cytologia9: 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, A. D. 1898. The origin and behavior of the centrosomes in the Annelid egg. Jour. Morph.14: 181–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medwedewa, G. B. 1930. Ueber die ‘Trabanten’ beiCrepis dioscoridis L. Zeits. f. Zellforsh. u. Mikr. Anat.10: 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensinkai, S. W. 1939a. Cytogenetic studies in the genusAllium. Jour. Genet.39: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939b. The conception of the satellite and the nucleolus, and the behavior of these bodies in cell division. Ann. Bot. n. s.3: 763–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939c. The structure and behavior of chromosomes in somatic mitosis. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.59: 82–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. 1918. Die biologische Bedeutung der Nucleolen. Zool. Anz.49: 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMol, W. E. 1928. Nucleolar number and size in diploid, triploid and aneuploid Hyacinths. La Cellule38: 7–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMol, W. E. 1937. D'un hybride d'espèces de Narcissus et de sa mutation somatique à la duplication du nombre des chromosomes et des nucléoles. Cytologia, Fujii Vol., pp. 633–640.

  • Montgomery, T. H. 1898. Comparative cytological studies, with special regard to the morphology of the nucleolus. Jour. Morph.15: 265–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, H. K. 1936. The chromosome morphology, secondary association and origin of cultivated rice. Jour. Genet.33: 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1937. Cytological investigations of rice varieties. Cytologia8: 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, V. 1925. Cell inclusion in the oogenesis of scorpions. Proc. Royal Soc. B98: 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navashin, M. 1926. Variabilität des Zellkerns beiCrepis-Arten in Bezug auf die Artbildung. Zeits. Zellf.4: 171–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. Chromosome alterations caused by hybridization and their bearing upon certain general genetic problems. Cytologia5: 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navashin, S. 1912. Sur le dimorphisme nucléaire des cellules somatiques deGaltonia candicans. Bull. Imp. Acad. Sci. Petersburg6: 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1927. Zellkerndimorphismus beiGaltonia candicans Des. und einigen verwandten Monokotylen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.45: 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J. andD. 1930. On phosphorous metabolism in embryonic life. I. Invertebrate eggs. Jour. Exp. Biol.7: 317–348.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, E. R. 1941. Nuclear cycles in the life history of the Protozoan genusCeratomyxa. Jour. Morph.69: 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, M. 1883. Die Veränderung der Pancreaszellen bei der Sekretion. Arch. Anat. u. Physiol., Phys. Abt.1883: 405–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oka, T. B. 1940. Extrusion of a nucleolusin toto, found in the ovarian oocytes ofHolothuria monacaria. Cytologia10: 545–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy, N. 1938. Further studies inOryza. Cytologia9: 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939. Cytological studies in Phalarideae. Ann. Bot.3: 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthak, G. N. 1940a. Studies in the cytology ofCrocus. Ann. Bot.4: 227–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. Studies in the cytology ofOenothera. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940c. Studies in the cytology of cereals. Jour. Genet.39: 437–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, D. F., andMetz, C. W. 1938. Studies on the structure of nucleolus-forming regions and related structures in the giant salivary gland chromosomes of Diptera. Jour. Morph.63: 363–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, T. S. andVenkatasubban, K. R. 1939. The cytology ofCrataeva religiosa Forst. Cytologia10: 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujam, S. 1937. Cytological behaviour of an autotriploid in rice (Oryza sativa). Jour. Genet.35: 183–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1938. Chromosome studies in the Oryzeae. Ann. Bot.2: 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenow, E. 1928. Ergebnisse mit der Nuclealfärbung bei Protozoen. Arch. Protistenk.61: 144–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resende, F. 1937. Über die Ubiquität der SAT-Chromosomen bei den Blütenpflanzen. Planta26: 757–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939. Über das Verhalten des SAT-Fadens. Planta29: 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940a. Über die Chromosomenstruktur in der Mitose der Wurzelspitze. II. SAT-differentiation, Spiralbau und Chromonemata. Chromosoma1: 486–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. Die Nukleolen beiAntirrhinum majus L. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.58: 460–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribbands, C. R. 1941. Meiosis in Diptera. I. Prophase associations of nonhomologous chromosomes, and their relation to mutual attraction between centromeres, centrosomes and chromosome ends. Jour. Genet.41: 411–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satina, S., Bergner, A. D., andBlakeslee, A. F. 1941. Morphological differentiation in chromosomes ofDatura stramonium. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, D. 1938. Karyotypes in Amaryllidaceae with special reference to the SAT-chromosome. Cytologia9: 203–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. Karyotype analysis inTricyrtis andBrachycyrtis with special reference to SAT—and nucleolar chromosomes. Cytologia10: 127–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, D. B. O. 1939. Nuclear structure and behavior in species of the Uredinales. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 585–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayles, L. P. 1927. Origin of the mesoderm and behavior of the nucleolus in regeneration inLumbriculus. Biol. Bull.52: 278–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, R. 1887. On the intra-ovarian egg of some osseous fishes. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci.28: 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, F. 1940. The formation of tetrads and the meiotic mitoses in the male ofRhytidolomia senilis Say. Jour. Morph.67: 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, K. E. 1915. Ueber Kern-und Plasmaveränderungen in Fettzellen während des Fettansatzes. Anat. Anz.48: 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J., Caspersson, T., andAquilonius, L. 1940. The genetic control of nucleolar composition. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.26: 515–523.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwann, T. 1839. Mikroskopische Untersuchungen. Ostwald's Klassiker der Exakten Wissens. No. 176. 1910.

  • Selim, A. G. 1930. A cytological study ofOryza sativa L. Cytologia2: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmens, C. S. 1940. Nature of the Feulgen reaction with nucleic acid. Nature146: 130–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andBhaduri, P. N. 1939. A technic for differential staining of nucleoli and chromosomes. Stain Tech.14: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—. 1941. Staining the nucleolus. Stain Tech.16: 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L. W. 1934. Introduction to cytology. 3rd Edition.

  • Sheffield, F. M. L. 1927. Cytological studies of certain meiotic stages inOenothera. Ann. Bot.41: 799–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941. The cytoplasmic and nuclear inclusions associated with severe etch virus. Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc.61: 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinke, N., andShigenaga, M. 1933. A histochemical study of plant nuclei in rest and mitosis. Cytologia4: 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, S. M. 1940a. A study of chromosome catenation inOenothera. Jour. Genet.39: 309–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. Study of the somatic chromosomes inNarcissus. Ann. Bot.4: 427–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940c. Cytogenetics ofBrassica hybrids and species. Jour. Genet.40: 441–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinotô, Y. 1938. Karyotype analysis inPaeonia. I. Cytologia9: 254–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearing, J. K. 1937. Cytological studies of the Myxophyceae. Arch. Protistenk.89: 209–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinath, K. V. 1939. Morphological and cytological studies in the genusCalceolaria. IV. Somatic chromosomes. Zeits. Abst. Vererb.77: 104–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. Meiosis in diploid and aneuploid calceolarias. Cytologia10: 457–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stough, H. B. 1931. Modified mitosis in the chick embryo. Jour. Morph.52: 535–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1935. Further studies in modified mitosis. Jour. Morph.58: 221–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M. K. 1935. Oogenesis ofClibanarius olivaceus (Henderson), with special reference to a seasonal variation in the cytoplasmic inclusions. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.55: 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andAiyar, R. G. 1935. Oogenesis ofAcentrogobius Neilli (Gobius Neilli Day), with special reference to the behaviour of the nucleoli. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.55: 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svedelius, N. 1937. The apomeiotic tetrad division inLomentaria rosea in comparison with the normal development inL. clavellosa. Symbolae Bot. Upsal.2: 2, pp. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, N. 1939. Chromosome studies in the Cyperaceae. IV. Chromosome number ofCarex species. Cytologia10: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. Chromosome studies in the Cyperaceae. VIII. Meiosis in diploid and tetraploid forms ofCarex siderosticta Hance. Cytologia11: 282–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatuno, S. 1941. Zytologische Untersuchungen über die Lebermoose von Japan. Jour. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. (Botany)4: 73–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. R. 1926. Chromosome morphology inFritillaria, Alstroemeria, Silphium, and other genera. Am. Jour. Bot.13: 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uber, F. M., andElls, V. R. 1941. The ultraviolet absorption spectrum of crystalline ribonuclease. Jour. Biol. Chem.141: 229–230.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andMcLaren, A. D. 1941. A photochemical yield for the inactivation of crystalline trypsin. Jour. Biol. Chem.141: 231–237.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valentin, G. 1836. Repertorium für Anatomie und Physiologie. Vol. I. Vol. IV. 1839. pp. 392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. 1835. Einige Bemerkungen und Fragen über das Keimbläschen (vesicula germinativa). Muller's Arch. Anat., Physiol. u. Wiss. Med. (From Montgomery.)

  • Walcott, G. B. 1939. The nucleolus-chromosome inPallavicinia lyellii. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warmke, H. E., andJohansen, D. A. 1935. Chromosomes of the Liliaceae. II.Trillium. Am. Jour. Bot.22: 694–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenrich, D. H. 1941. The morphology of some Protozoan parasites in relation to microtechnique. Jour. Parasitol.27: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, M. A. 1935. Observations on nuclear structure in the Florideae. Beih. Bot. Centlbl.53A: 564–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. 1941. The cytology of the cricket bat willow (Salix alba var.caerulea) Ann. Bot.5: 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. 1913. A chromatoid body simulating an accessory chromosome inPentatoma. Biol. Bull.24: 392–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B., 1925. The cell.

  • DeWiniwarter, H. 1912. Études sur la spermatogenèse humaine Arch. de Biol.27: 91–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. W. 1937. The nucleolus inTulipa. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 528–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasui, K. 1938. Myelin forms in acetocarmine smear preparations. Lecithin as a nuclear constituent. Cytologia9: 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, J. S. 1925. The nucleolus ofTmesipteris tannensis Bernh. Proc. Royal Soc. B98: 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuasa, A. 1937. Studies in the cytology of Pteridophyta. XIII. Some effects of chromic acid on Feulgen's nucleal-reaction. Cytologia8: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, E. 1885. Über den Nukleolus. Bot. Zeit.43: 257–265, 273–283, 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, C. 1928. Nucleolus in root tip meristem ofZea mays. Bot. Gaz.86: 402–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1930. Nucleoli of the root tip and cambium ofPinus strobus. Cytologia2: 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. King's College and Marine Biological Laboratory, University of London, Woods Hole, Mass.

    R. Ruggles Gates

Authors
  1. R. Ruggles Gates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gates, R.R. Nucleoli and related nuclear structures. Bot. Rev 8, 337–409 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02882158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02882158

Keywords

Search

Navigation