Skip to main content
Log in

Guide to health: Nutrition and physical activity outcomes of a group-randomized trial of an internet-based intervention in churches

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Theory-based interventions accessible to large groups of people are needed to induce favorable shifts in health behaviors and body weight.Purpose: The aim was to assess nutrition; physical activity; and, secondarily, body weight in the tailored, social cognitive Guide to Health (GTH) Internet intervention delivered in churches.Methods: Participants (N=1,071; 33% male, 23% African American, 57% with body mass index ≥25, 60% sedentary, Mdn age=53 years) within 14 Baptist or United Methodist churches were randomized to the GTH intervention only (GTH-Only; 5 churches), with church-based supports (GTH-Plus; 5 churches), or to a waitlist (control; 4 churches). Verified pedometer step counts, measured body weight, fat, fiber, and fruit and vegetable (F&V) servings from food frequency and supermarket receipts were collected at pretest, posttest (7 months after pretest), and follow-up (16 months after pretest).Results: Participants in GTH-Only increased F&V at post (∼1.50 servings) compared to control (∼0.50 servings; p=.005) and at follow-up (∼1.20 vs. ∼0.50 servings; p=.038) and increased fiber at post (∼3.00 g) compared to control (∼1.5 g; p=.006) and follow-up (∼3.00 g vs. ∼2.00 g; p=.040). GTH-Plus participants compared to control increased steps at post (∼1,500 steps/day vs. ∼400 steps/day; p=.050) and follow-up (∼1,000 steps/day vs. ∼−50 steps/day; p=.010), increased F&V at post (∼1.5 servings; p=.007) and follow-up (∼1.3 servings; p=.014), increased fiber at post (∼3.00 g; p=.013), and follow-up (∼3.00; p=.050) and decreased weight at post (∼−0.30 kg vs. ∼+0.60 kg; p=.030).Conclusions: Compared to control, both GTH treatments improved nutrition at posttest, but church supports improved physical activity and nutrition at posttest and follow-up, suggesting environmental supports may improve Internet-based interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts CK, Barnard RJ: Effects of exercise and diet on chronic disease.Journal of Applied Physiology. 2005,98:3–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reeves MJ, Rafferty AP: Healthy lifestyle characteristics among adults in the United States, 2000.Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005,165:854–857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finkelstein EA, Ruhm CJ, Kosa KM: Economic causes and consequences of obesity.Annual Review of Public Health. 2005,26:239–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Block G: Food contributing to energy intake in the US: Data from NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2000.Journal of Food Consumption and Analysis. 2004,17:439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz DL: Competing dietary claims for weight loss.Annual Review of Public Health. 2005,26:61–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffery RW, Drewnowski A, Epstein LH, et al.: Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status.Health Psychology. 2000,19:5–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffery RW: How can behavior theory be made more useful for intervention research?International Journal of Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2004,1:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perri MG, Corisca JA: Improving the maintenance of weight lost in behavioral treatment of obesity. In Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ (eds),Handbook of Obesity Treatment. New York: Guilford, 2002, 357–375.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, et al.: Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999,281:327–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Writing Group for the Activity Counseling Trial Research Group: Effects of physical activity counseling in primary care: The activity counseling trial.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001,286:677–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan GE, Anton SD, Sydeman SJ, et al.: Prescribing exercise at varied levels of intensity and frequency.Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005,165:2362–2369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Winett RA, Tate DT, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett SG: Weight gain prevention: A theoretically-based, long-term Internet approach.Preventive Medicine. 2005,41:629–641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill JO, Sallis JF, Peters JC: Economic analysis of eating and physical activity: A next step for research and policy changes.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004,27:111–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reid E: Can the physical environment determine physical activity levels?Exercise and Sports Science Review. 2005,33:69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, et al.: An ecological approach to creating living environments.Annual Review of Public Health. 2006,27:297–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reger B, Cooper L, Booth-Butterfield S, et al.: Wheeling walks: A community campaign using paid media to encourage walking among sedentary older adults.Preventive Medicine. 2002,35:285–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bandura A:Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bandura A: Health promotion by social cognitive means.Health Education and Behavior. 2004,31:143–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eng E, Hatch J, Callan A: Institutionalizing social support through the church and into the community.Health Education Quarterly. 1985,12:81–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hatch J, Derthick S: Empowering Black churches for health promotion.Health Values. 199,16:3–11.

  22. Lasater TM, Carleton RS, Wells BL: Religious organizations and large-scale health-related lifestyle change programs.Journal of Health Education. 1991,22:233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Winett RA, Anderson ES, Whiteley JA, et al.: Church-based health behavior programs: using social cognitive theory to formulate interventions for at-risk populations.Applied and Preventive Psychology. 1999,8:124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Campbell MK, Demark-Wahnefried W, Symons M, et al.: Improving fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention in communities: The Black Churches United for Better Health Project.American Journal of Public Health. 1999,89:1390–1396.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Resnicow K, Jackson A, Wang T, et al.: A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through Black churches: Results of the Eat for Life Trial.American Journal of Public Health. 2001,91:1686–1693.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell MK, James A, Hudson MA, et al.: Improving multiple behaviors for colorectal cancer prevention among African American church members.Health Psychology. 2004,23:492–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Resnicow K, Jackson A, Bissett D: Results of the healthy body, healthy spirit trial.Health Psychology. 2005,24:339–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Resnicow K, Campbell MK, Carr C, et al.: Body and soul: A dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004,27:97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rose G:The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR, Winett SG, Bowden T: A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: Direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancies among food shoppers.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2001,23:88–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Walberg-Rankin J, Anderson ES, Winett RA: Food purchase patterns at the grocery store and their relationship to family characteristics.Journal of Nutrition Education. 1998,30:81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Bickley PG, et al.: The effects of a multimedia system in supermarkets to alter shoppers’ food purchases.Journal of Health Psychology. 1997,2:209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett RA, Williams DA: Social cognitive determinants of physical activity: The influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome-expectations, and self-regulation.Health Psychology. 2006,25:510–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. American College of Sports Medicine:ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (7th Ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Meyers J, Do D, Herbert WG, Ribisl P, Froelicher VF: A nonogram to predict exercise capacity from a specific activity questionnaire and clinical data.American Journal of Cardiology. 1999,73:591–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG: CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomized trials.British Medical Journal. 2004,328:702–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kazdin AE:Behavior Modification in Applied Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ: Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q).Canadian Journal of Sport Science. 1992,17:338–345.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Berkeley Nutrition Services:Block 98 Food Frequency Questionnaire. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Nutrition Services, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR: Social cognitive determinants of nutrition behavior among supermarket shoppers: A structural equation analysis.Health Psychology. 2000,19:479–486.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Murray DM:Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL: Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: A review of recent methodological developments.American Journal of Public Health. 2004,94:423–432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Houck PA, Mazumdar S, Koru-Sengul T, et al.: Estimating treatment effects from longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values: Comparative analyses using different methods.Psychiatric Research. 2004,129:209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hedges LV: Effect sizes in cluster randomized designs.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. (in press).

  45. Lewis CE, Jacobs DR, Jr., McCreath H, et al.: Weight gain continues in the 90’s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from the CARDIA Study.American Journal of Epidemiology. 2000,151:1172–1181.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dzewaltowski DA, Galsgow RE, Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Brock E: RE-AIM: Evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004,28:75–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rothman AJ, Baldwin AS, Hertel AW: Self-regulation and behavior change: Disentangling behavioral initiation and behavioral maintenance. In Vohs K, Baumeister R (eds),The Handbook of Self-Regulation. New York: Guilford, 2004, 130–149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Winett Ph.D., C.R.H.B..

Additional information

This project was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (RO1CA79469) to Virginia Tech. The trial is registered in the National Cancer Institute’s PDQ trial registry (VPISU-05-209).

About this article

Cite this article

Winett, R.A., Anderson, E.S., Wojcik, J.R. et al. Guide to health: Nutrition and physical activity outcomes of a group-randomized trial of an internet-based intervention in churches. ann. behav. med. 33, 251–261 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879907

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879907

Keywords

Navigation