Abstract
Survival time ofErwinia carotovora var.carotovora (Ecc) andE.c. var.atroseptica (Eca), causal agents of potato blackleg and bacterial soft rot, was determined both internally and externally on two known insect vectors,Drosophila melanogaster Meig. andD. busckii Coq. The results indicate that the two bacterial varieties survived internally on both vectors for 48 hours and in some cases up to 72 hours.Ecc andEca survived externally on both vectors for at least 24 hours and in some cases at low levels for 48 hours. The two varieties of bacteria declined in number with elapsed time both internally and externally. We suggest that the vectors enhance survival of the non-spore formingErwinia cells outside the plant host. The enhanced survival, combined with the dispersal ability of the vectors, increases the destructive potential of these bacteria. There appeared to be no differential survival of the two bacterial varieties on the vectors studied that might account for the differential transmission reported by previous workers.
Resumen
Se condujeron experimentos para determinar el tiempo de sobrevivencia deErwinia carotovora var.carotovora (Ecc) yE.c. var.atroseptica (Eca), patógenos causantes de pierna negra y pudredumbre bacteriana de la papa, en estructuras internas y externas de dos insectos de las bacterias,Drosophila melanogaster Meig. yDrosophila busckii Coq. Los resultados indican que las dos variedades de bacteria sobrevivieron 48 horas, y en ciertos casos hasta 72 horas, en estructuras de ambas especies de insectos vectores.Ecc yEca sobrevivieron por los menos 24 horas, y en números muy reducidos hasta 48 horas, en la superficie externa de ambos vectores. El número de células de ambas variedades decayó en función al tiempo transcurrido en estructuras externas e internas. Sugerimos que los vectores protegen las células deErwinia, que no producen esporas, contra condiciones ambientales y aumentan el tiempo de sobrevivencia fuera de la planta huesped. Esta protección, junto con las capacidad de dispersión de los vectores, aumentan el potencial destructivo de estas bacterias. No fueron evidentes diferencias de sobrevivencia entre las dos variedades de bacteria que oudieran ser causa de la transmisión diferencial notada por otros investigadores.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Ark, P.A. and H. Earl Thomas. 1936. Persistence ofErwinia amylovora in certain insects. Phytopathology 26:375–381.
Brewer, J.W., M.D. Harrison and J.A. Winston. 1980. Differential attraction ofDrosophila melanogaster Meig. to potato tissue infected with two varieties ofErwinia carotovora. Am Potato J 57:219–224.
Deboer, S.H. and A. Kelman. 1975. Evaluation of procedures for detection of pectolyticErwinia spp. on potato tubers. Am Potato J 52:117–125.
Graham, D.C., C.E. Quinn, I. Ann Sells and M.D. Harrison. 1979. Survival of strains of soft rot bacteria on microthreads exposed in the laboratory and in the open air. J Appl Bacteriol 46:367–76.4.
Harrison, M.D., C.E. Quinn, I. Ann Sells and D.C. Graham. 1977. Waste potato dumps as sources of insects contaminated with soft rot coliform bacteria in relation to recontamination of pathogen free potato stocks. Potato Res 20:37–52.
Harrison, M.D., J. Wayne Brewer and Laura Merrill. 1980. Insect involvement in the transmission of bacterial pathogen. In: Vectors of Plant Pathogens. K.F. Harris and K. Maramorsch, Eds. Academic Press, New York. 467 pp.
Kloepper, J.W. 1977. The role of insects in the epidemiology of potato blackleg. M.S. Thesis. Dept. Botany and Plant Path., Colo. St. U., Ft. Collins, Colo.
Kloepper, J.W., M.D. Harrison and J.W. Brewer. 1979. The association ofErwinia carotovora var.atroseptica andErwinia carotovora var.carotovora with insects in Colorado. Am Potato J 56:351–361.
Kloepper, J.W., J.W. Brewer and M.D. Harrison, 1981. Insect transmission ofErwinia carotovora var.carotovora andErwinia carotovora var.atroseptica to potato plants in the field. Am Potato J 58:165–175.
Leach, J.G. 1926. The relation of the seed-corn maggot (Phorbia fuciceps Zett) to the spread and development of potato blackleg in Minnesota. Phytopathology 16:149–176.
Leach, J.G. 1931. Further studies on the seed-corn maggot and bacteria with special reference to potato blackleg. Phytopathology 21:387–406.
Miles, A.A. and S.S. Misra. 1938. The estimation of the bactericidal powers of the blood. J. Hygiene 38:732.
Molina, J.J., M.D. Harrison and J.W. Brewer. 1974. Transmission ofErwinia carotovora var.atroseptica byDrosophila melanogaster Meig. 1. Acquisition and transmission of the bacterium. Am Potato J 51:245–250.
Molina, J.J. 1976. The role ofErwinia carotovora in the epidemiology of potato blackleg. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Botany and Plant Path., Colo. State U., Ft. Collins, Colo.
Perombelon, M.C.M. 1971. The extent and survival of contamination of potato stocks in Scotland byErwinia carotovora var.carotovora andErwinia carotovora var.atroseptica. Ann Appl Biol 71:111–117.
Stewart, D.J. 1962. A selective-diagnostic medium for the isolation of pectinolytic organisms in the Enterobacteriaceae. Nature 195:1023.
Thomas, H. Earl and P.A. Ark. 1934. Fire blight of pears and related plants. Calif Agric Exp Stn Bull S86.
Yerington, A.P. and R.W. Warner. 1961. Flight distances ofDrosophila determined with radioactive phosphorous. J Econ Entomol 54:425–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brewer, J.W., Harrison, M.D. & Winston, J.A. Survival of two varieties ofErwinia carotovora onDrosophila melanogaster meigen andDrosophila busckii Coquillett, (Diptera:Drosophilidae) vectors of potato blackleg in Colorado. American Potato Journal 58, 439–449 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02874541
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02874541