Skip to main content
Log in

The response of four potato cultivars to chloride salinity, sulfate salinity and calcium in pot experiments

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Potato plants (cvs. ‘Russet Burbank’, ‘Red Pontiac’, ‘Norchip’ and ‘Norgold Russet’) were grown in an artificial medium for 28 days under greenhouse conditions and were watered with solutions containing various rates of NaCl or Na2SO4 alone and in combination with CaSO4. NaCl and Na2SO4 slowed growth of young plants. On a mole basis Na2SO4 slowed growth more than NaCl. The addition of CaSO4 reduced the deleterious effect of NaCl or Na2SO4 solutions. Growth of ‘Russet Burbank’ plants was the most adversely affected by solutions of NaCl or Na2SO4. Watering with solutions of NaCl or Na2SO4 also reduced the number of ‘Russet Burbank’ plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bernstein, L. 1975. Effects of salinity and sodicity on plant growth. Annu Rev Phytopathol 13:295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein, L. and H.E. Hayward. 1958. Physiology of salt tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 9:25–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bresler, E., B.L. McNeal and D.L. Carter. 1982.Saline and Sodic Soils. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York. 168–171.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ciesla, W., G. Skraga-Bilska and J. Bilski. Electrical conductivity of soil solution as influenced by cultivation and fertilization of gray brown podzoic soil. Polish Annuals of Soil Science. In Press.

  5. Cramer, G.R. and A.R. Spurr. 1986. Responses of lettuce to salinity. I. Effects of NaCl and Na2SO4 on growth. J Plant Nutr 9(2): 115–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer, G.R. and A.R. Spurr. 1986. Responses of lettuce to salinity. II. Effect of calcium on growth and mineral status. J Plant Nutr 9(2): 131–142.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoagland, D.R. and DJ. Arnon. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Univ. California, Berkeley; Calif Agric Exp Stn Circ 347.

  8. Kent, L.M. and A. Lauchli. 1985. Germination and seedling growth of cotton: salinitycalcium interactions. Plant Cell and Environ 8:155–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. LaHaye, P.A. and E. Epstein. 1969. Salt toleration by plants: enhancement with calcium. Science 166:395–396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maas, E.V. and G.J. Hoffman. 1977. Crop salt tolerance-current assessment, J Irrig Drainage Div 103:115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maianu, Alexandru. 1985. Saline and sodic soils; genesis and properties of saline and sodic soils, methods of reclamation and management practices for crop production. Manual; Dept. of Soil Science; North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stavarek, S.J. and W. Rains. 1983. Mechanisms for salinity tolerance in plants. Iowa State J of Res 57:457–476.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeo, A.R. 1983. Salinity resistance: Physiologies and prices. Physiol Plant 58:214–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published with the approval of the Director of the North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Article Number 1604.

Formerly Foreign Exchange Scientist, Department of Horticulture and Forestry, North Dakota State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bilski, J.J., Nelson, D.C. & Conlon, R.L. The response of four potato cultivars to chloride salinity, sulfate salinity and calcium in pot experiments. American Potato Journal 65, 85–90 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02867456

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02867456

Other Key Words

Navigation