Skip to main content
Log in

The mango—its botany, cultivation, uses and future improvement, especially as observed in india

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This delicious tropical fruit has been under cultivation tor about 4,000 years and today it is grown on about two million acres in India, its original home. Nearly 1,000 cultivated varieties are known throughout the tropics oi the world. The fruits are rich in vitamins A and C, and have better food value than apple.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Alcala, P. E., and San Pedro, A. 1935. Bud differentiation in smudged trees. Philip. Agr.24: 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ann. fruit preservation number. Punjab Fruit Jour. 1944.

  3. Arndt, C. H. 1935. Notes on polyembryony and multiple shoots from the seed in Mangifera indica. Am. Jour. Bot.22: 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bajwa, B. S., and Musahib-ud-din. 1946. The present status of mango industry in the Punjab. Punjab Fruit Jour.10: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belling, J. 1930 Mango. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rep: 110–125.

  6. Bhutiani, R. C. 1946. Vitamin content of the mango. Punjab Fruit Jour.10: 112–115.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bijhouwer, A. P. C. 1937. Een bijdrage tot de kennis omtrent het bloeien en het vruchtdragende vernogen van den Mangga (Mangifera indica L.) [The flowering and fruiting habits of the mango].

  8. Bombay Dept. Agr. 1930. Lft. 2.

  9. Burkill, I. H. 1935. A dictionary of the economic products of the Malay Peninsula. Vol.2: 1401–1406.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burns, W., and Prayag, S. H. 1921. The book of the mango. Dept. Agr., Bombay, Bull. 103, 98 pp.

  11. Cheema, G. S., and Dani, P. G. 1938. Report on the export of mango to Europe in 1932. Dept. Agr., Bombay, Bull. 170.

  12. -, Karmaker, D. V., and Joshi, B. M. Investigation on the cold storage of mangoes. Indian Coun. Agr. Res., Misc. Bull.21. 1939. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci. 20: 259–325. 1950.

  13. Das Gupta, S. N., and Sinha, S. 1944. Studies, etc. IV. Investigation into the pathological histology of fruits affected with “ Black-tip ” disease with a note on the anatomy of the fruit. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India14: 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  14. — and Verma, G. S. 1939. Studies in the diseases ofMangifera indica L. I. Preliminary observations on the necrosis of the mango fruit with special reference to the external symptoms of the disease. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.9: 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  15. — and —. 1940. Studies in the diseases ofMangifera indica L. II. Effect of injecting healthy mango fruits with extract from naturally occurring necrotic mangoes.Ibid. 12: 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  16. —,— and Sinha, S. 1941 Studies, etc. III. Investigation into the effect of sulphur dioxide gas on the mango fruit.Ibid. 13: 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  17. — and Zachariah, A. T. 1945. Studies, etc. V. On the die-back disease of the mango tree. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.24: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  18. — et al. 1950. Necrosis of the mango fruit. Curr. Sci.19: 153.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. De Candolle, A. P. 1884. Origin of cultivated plants.

  20. Dudgeon, W. 1929. The morphology ofMangifera indica L. Proc. Indian Sci. Congr.: 230.

  21. Edwards, B. 1793. History of the West Indies.

  22. Firminger, T. A. C. 1874. A manual of gardening for Bengal and Upper India.

  23. Gokhale, A. V., and Kanitkar, U. K. 1951. Fruit drop in Alfonso mango and its control. Proc. Indian Sci. Congr.:151.

  24. Higgins, J. E. 1906. The mango in Hawaii. Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 12.

  25. ---. 1910. Shield budding the mango.Ibid. Bull. 20.

  26. Juliano, J. B. 1934. Origin of the embryos in the strawberry mango. Philip. Jour. Sci.54: 553–563.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —. 1937. Embryos of Carabao mango (Mangifera indica). Philip. Agr.25: 749–758.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Juliano, J. B., and Cuevas, N. L. 1932. Floral morphology of the mango (Mangijera indica L.) with special reference to the Pico variety from the Philippines. Philip. Agr.21: 449–472.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kinman, C. F. 1918. The mango in Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico Agr. Expt. Sta., Bull.24.

  30. Lanuza. 1939. Notes on bud differentiation in Carabao mango (Mangifera indica L.). Philip. Jour. Agr.10: 131.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leley, V. K., Narayana, N., and Daji, J. A. 1943. Biochemical studies in the growth and ripening of the Alphonse mango. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.13: 291–299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Maheshwari, P. 1934. The Indian mango. Curr. Sci.3: 97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mallik, P. C. 1951. Morphology and biology of the mango flower. Proc. Indian Sci. Congr.: 155.

  34. Maries, C. 1901-2. Indian mangoes. Jour. Royal Hort Soc.26: 755–770.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Miquel, F. A. G. 1859. Flora van Nederlandsch Indie. Vol. 1(2): 627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mukherjee, S. K. 1948. The varieties of mango (Mangifera indica L.) and their classification. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal2: 101–133.

    Google Scholar 

  37. —. 1949a. A monograph on the genusMangifera L. Lloydia12: 73–136.

    Google Scholar 

  38. —. 1949b. The mango and its relatives. Sci. and Cult.15: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. — 1950a. Wild mangoes of India. Sci. and Cult.15: 469–471.

    Google Scholar 

  40. —. 1950b. Cytological investigation on the mango (Mangifera indica L.) and the allied Indian species. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci., India16: 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  41. —. 1950c. Mango, its allopolyploid nature. Nature150: 196–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. —. 1951a. The origin of mango. Indian Jour. Genet, and Plant Breed.11: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  43. —. 1951b. Pollen analysis inMangijera in relation to fruit-set and taxonomy. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.30: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Musahib-ud-din. 1946. Fruit bud differentiation in mangoes in the Punjab. Punjab Fruit Jour.10: 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  45. — and Bhutiani, R. C. 1946. Mango products.Ibid. 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  46. — and Dinsa, H. S. 1946. The floral count and fruit-set studies in some of the North Indian mangoes.Ibid. 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mustard, M.J. 1945. Mangoes and guavas as sources of ascorbic acid. Proc. Ann. Meet. Florida State Hort. Soc.58: 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  48. — and Lynch, S. J. 1946. Flower bud formation and development inMangifera indica. Bot. Gaz.108: 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Naik, K. C. 1941. South Indian mangoes. Agr. Dept. Madras, Bull.24.

  50. — and Rao, M. M. 1943. Studies on blossom biology and pollination in mangoes (Mangifera indica L.). Indian Jour. Hort.1: 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  51. — and Gangolly, S. R. 1950. A monograph on classification and nomenclature of South Indian mangoes. (Govt. Press, Madras) 311 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Oppenheimer, C. 1947. The acclimatisation of new tropical and subtropical fruit trees in Palestine. Agr. Res. Sta., Rehovot, Palestine, Bull.44.

  53. Pal, N. L., Chatterjee, U. N., and Ranjan, S. 1937. Effect of gases from brick kilns on mango crops. Proc. 24th Indian Sci. Congr.: 270–271.

  54. Paul, W. R. C., and Guneratnam, S. C. 1939. Propagation of the mango in Jaffa. Trop. Agr.16: 158.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Perry, E. O. V., and Zilva, S. S. 1932. Empire Marketing Board preliminary report on vitamin content of the mango.

  56. Pope, W. T. 1929. Mango culture in Hawaii. Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.58.

  57. Popenoe, W. 1917. The pollination of the mango. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Plant Ind., Bull. 542.

  58. ---. 1932. Manual of tropical and subtropical fruits.

  59. Rahman, K. A. 1946. Important insect pests of the mango and how to combat them. Punjab Fruit Jour.10: 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Roy, R. S., Mallik, P. C., and De, B. N. 1951. Manuring of the mango (Mangifera indica). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.57: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rumphius, G. E. 1741. Herbarium Amboinense. Vol. 1: 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sattar, A. 1946. Diseases of mango in the Punjab. Punjab Fruit Jour.10: 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sen, P. K. 1939. Fruit Res. Sta., Sabour, Bihar, Ann. Rep. 1938–39.

  64. —. 1941. “Black-tip” of the mango. Sci. and Cult.7: 56.

    Google Scholar 

  65. —. 1943. The bearing problem of the mango and how to control it. Indian Jour. Hort.1: 48–71.

    Google Scholar 

  66. —. 1946. You can get a full crop of mango every year. Punjab Fruit Jour.10: 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  67. — and Mallik, P. C. 1940. Embryo of the Indian mangoes (Mangifera indica L.). Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.10: 750–760.

    Google Scholar 

  68. — and —. 1941. The time of differentiation of the flower bud of the mango.Ibid. 11: 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sen, P. K., and Roy, P. K. 1945. Mineral nutrition of the mango. Proc. Indian Sci. Congr. Pt. III: 23.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Singh, L., and Khan, A. A. 1939. Relation of growth to fruit bearing in mangoes. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.9: 835–856.

    Google Scholar 

  71. -, and -. 1942. Mango budding in situ—A new technique likely to revolutionize mango industry. Punjab Fruit Jour.

  72. Singh, S. 1946. Propagation of the mango in the Punjab. Punjab Fruit Jour.10: 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sturrock, D. 1944. Notes on the mango (published in cooperation with the Atkins Institution of the Arnold Arboretum, Cienfuegos, Cuba). 122 pp.

  74. Sturrock, T. T., and Wolfe, H. S. 1944. A key to Florida mango varieties. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.: 175–180.

  75. Trotter. 1941. The common commercial timbers of India and their uses. P. 129–130.

  76. Wagle, P. V. 1929. The mango hoppers and mildew and their control. Poona Agr. Coll. Mag.21: 170–173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Wardlow, C. W., and Leonard, E. R. 1936. The storage of West Indian mangoes. Bull. Low Temp. Res. Sta., Imp. Coll. Trop. Agr., Trinidad, 1–47.

  78. Watt, G. 1891. Dictionary of the economic products of India. Vol. 5: 146.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wester, P. J. 1920. The mango. Philip. Bur. Agr., Bull. 18.

  80. Woodhouse, E. J. 1909. The mangoes of Bhagalpur. Quart. Jour. Dept. Agr. Bengal2: 168–187.

    Google Scholar 

  81. —. 1909. The mangoes of Bihar.Ibid. 2: 283.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukherjee, S.K. The mango—its botany, cultivation, uses and future improvement, especially as observed in india . Econ Bot 7, 130–162 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02863059

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02863059

Keywords

Navigation