Skip to main content
Log in

The commercial seed trade: An early disperser of weeds in the United States

Der Samenhandel: ein frühen Verbreiter von Unkräutern in den Vereinigten Staaten

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seeds, bulbs, and cuttings of exotic plant species, including plants cultivated exclusively as ornamentals, were being advertised for sale in printed circulars in the United States by 1800. By the end of the 19th century seed trade catalogs were prolific and often listed dozens of exotic species that were already naturalized in the U.S. or new introductions from foreign suppliers. Among the species routinely offered for sale were many now considered noxious (e.g.,Berberis vulgaris, Eichhornia crassipes, Isatis tinctoria) or at least undesirable (e.g.,Cannabis sativa, Eleusine indica, Lysimachia nummularia). This commerce was not only responsible for the introduction and spread of some species earlier than previously recognized (e.g.,Bryonia alba, Schinus terebinthifolius) but also caused the deliberate distribution of other species assumed to have been spread by accident alone (e.g.,Aegilops cylindrica, Bromus briziformis, Bromus mollis). Seedsmen’s introduction of substantial genetic variation through repeated introductions, inadvertent directional selection for local races in their gardens, their widespread use of seeds (compared to cuttings or non-fertile plant material), and the sowing of seeds at high density under cultivation all enhanced the opportunity for eventual naturalizations. The largely unrecognized proliferation of this industry in the 19th century and the ready access that consumers had to these species via mail order contributed to the rapid and extensive dissemination of at least 139 alien species throughout the United States.

Résumé

Samen, Zwiebeln, und Stecklinge von exotischen Pflanzenarten, inklusive Pflanzen, die man ausschliesslich als Zierpflanzen kultivierte, wurden schon um 1800 durch Rundschreiben in den USA zum Verkauf angeboten. Zum Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts waren Samenhandelskataloge weitverbeitet undfuehrten oft Dutzende von exotischen Arten, die sich schon in den USA heimisch gemacht hatten, oder neues Material von auslaendischen Lieferanten. Unter den Arten, die ueblicherweise zum Verkauf angeboten wurden, befanden sich nun viele, die heute als schaedlich (z.B.Berberis vulgaris, Eichhornia crassipes, Isatis tinctoria) oder wenigstens als unerwuenscht (z.B.Cannabis sativa, Eleusine indica, Lysimachia nummularia) angesehen werden. Dieser Handel war nicht nur verantwortlich fuer die Einfuerung und Verbreitung mancher Arten zu einem frueheren Zeitpunkt als bisher vermutet (z.B.Bryonia alba, Schinus terebinthifolius), sondern verursachte ebenso die absichtliche Verbreitung anderer Arten, von denen man annahm, dass sie lediglich durch Zufall verbreitet wurden (z.B.Aegilops cylindrica, Bromus briziformis, Bromus mollis). Der Anstoss zu wesentlicher genetischer Variation durch wiederholte Einfuhr durch Samenhaendler, unbeabsichtigte natuerliche Auslese von lokalen Arten in ihren Gaerten, der weitverbreiteter Gebrauch von Samen (im Gegensatz zu Stecklingen oder anderen Arten der vegetativen Vermehrung), sowie dem dichten Saeen von Samen im Anbau, dies alles erhoehte die Gelegenheit zur schliesslicher Naturalisierung. Die weitgehend unerkannte Ausbreitung dieser Industrie im 19. Jahrhundert und der leichte Zugang, den Kunden zu diesen Pflanzenarten per Postversand hatten, trugen zur raschen und ausgedehnten Verbreitung von mindestens 139 fremden Arten in den ganzen USA bei.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anonymous. 1905. Seeds and plants imported during the period from September, 1900, to December,1903. U.S.D.A. Bur. PI. Industr. Bull. 66.

  • Bailey, L. H. 1914. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. Vol. II. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Manual of cultivated plants. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G. 1972. Migration of weeds. Pages 327–347in D. H. Valentine, ed., Taxonomy, phytogeography and evolution. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. C. H. 1982. Genetic variation in weeds. Pages 73–98in R. Charudattan and H. L. Walker, eds., Biological control of weeds with plant pathogens. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. Waterweed invasions. Sci. Amer. 261(4):9O-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, N. C. W., O. D. Evans, andR. C. Carolin. 1972. Flora of the Sydney region. A. H. & A. W. Reed, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. H. D., andJ. J. Burdon. 1983. Multilocus diversity in an outbreeding weed, Echium plantagineum L. Austral. J. Biol. Sci. 36:503–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, J. J., andD. R. Marshall. 1981. Biological control and the reproductive mode of weeds. J. Appl.Ecol. 18:649–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callihan, R. H., S. A. Dewey, J. E. Patton, andD. C. Thill. 1984. Distribution, biology, and habitat of dyer’s woad (Isatis tinctoria). J. Idaho Acad. Sci. 20:18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenser, E. M. 1962. The rate of naturalization of tamarix in Utah. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 68:51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, A. R., T. G. Tutin, andD. M. Moore. 1987. Flora of the British Isles. 3rd ed. Cambridge Univ.Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll, D. S., andM. C. Johnston. 1970. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Texas Research Foundation. Renner, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? Pages 429–453in A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley, and P. J. Edwards, eds., Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon,W. 1983. Changes in the land. Hill and Wang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, H. T. 1918. Weed migration into Michigan. Mich. Acad. Sci. 20th Annual Report 20:261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, O. K., D. A. Kolva, andP. J. Mehringer, Jr. 1977. Pollen analysis of Wildcat Lake, Whitman County, Washington: the last 1000 years. Northwest Sci. 51:13–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Schweinitz, L. D. 1836. Remarks on the plants of Europe which have become naturalized in a more or less degree, in the United States. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. New York 3:148–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, L. H. 1897. Migration of weeds. U.S.D.A. Yearbook 1896:263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, W.W. 1980. Jointed goat grass—a new problem in Colorado wheat. Proc. W. Soc. Weed Sci. 33: 77–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, R. D. 1984. Vascular plants of Montana. Mountain West Publishing, Cheyenne, WY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, C. D. 1984. Weed survey-southern states. S. Weed Sci. Soc. Rep. 37:192–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, K. O., A. F. Tanaka, andN. E. West. 1988. Autecology and population biology of Dyers Woad (Isatis tinctoria). Weed Sci. 36:186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray’s manual of botany. 8th ed. American Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcella, F., andS. J. Harvey. 1983. Relative abundance in an alien weed flora. Oecologia 59:292–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foy, C. L., D. R. Forney, andW. E. Cooley. 1983.History of weed introductions. Pages 65–92 in C.L. Wilson and C. L. Graham, eds., Exotic plant pests and North American agriculture. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, R. K., andJ. W. Wooten. 1979. Aquatic and wetland plants of southeastern United States.Univ. Georgia Press, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. H. 1986. Plant invasions of Australia: an overview. Pages 137–149in R. H. Groves and J.J. Burdon, eds., Ecology of biological invasions.Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. 1852. Flora homeopathica. H. Baillere,London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, A. H., andF. A. Bazzaz.1970. Some ecological implications of the distribution of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in the United States of America. Pages 39–48in C. R. B. Joyce and S. H. Curry, eds., The botany and chemistry of Cannabis. J. & A. Churchill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L. 1965. Establishment, aggression, and cohabitation in weedy species. Pages 243–265in H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins, eds., The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, U. P. 1950. A history of horticulture in America. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hem, J. D. 1967. Comparison of saline residues on leaves and stems of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra Pallas). U.S.G.S. Prof. Pap. 491-C.

  • Hitchcock, A. S. 1951. Manual of the grasses of the United States. 2nd ed. U.S.D.A. Misc. Publ. 200.

  • Hitchcock, C. L., A. Cronquist, M. Ownbey, andJ. W. Thompson. 1955-1969. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part IV. Ericaceae through Campanulaceae.(1959). Part V. Compositae. (1955).Univ. Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L. G., L. W. Weldon, andR. D. Blackburn.1969. Aquatic weeds. Science 166:699–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —,D. L. Plucknett, J. V. Pancho, andJ. P. Herberger.1977. The world’s worst weeds. Univ.Hawaii Press, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J. S. 1964. Notes on the introduction of deciduous tamarisk. U.S.F.S. Res. Note RM-16.

  • Hutton, L. D. 1928. Barberry eradication reducing stem rust losses in wide areas. U.S.D.A. Yearbook 1927:114–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klorer, J. 1909. The water hyacinth problem. J. Assoc.Eng. Soc. 42:42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. H. M. 1969. Horticulture. Pages 132–145inJ.Ewan, ed., A. short history of botany in the United States. Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeConte, J. L., G. H. Horn, J. Leidy, J. G. Hunt, andT. Meehan. 1881. Report on plants introduced by means of the International Exhibition, 1876.Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 32:132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, L. A. 1985. An alien shrub in a changing landscape: the European buckthorn (Rhamnus catharticaL.) in southeastern Wisconsin. Unpubl.Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, R.W., andO. Lakela. 1971. A flora of tropical Florida. Univ. Miami Press, Coral Gables, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N. 1981. Invasion of Bromus tectorum L.into western North America: an ecological chronicle. Agro-ecosystems 7:145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. Invading plants: their potential contribution to population biology. Pages 127–142in J. White, ed., Studies on plant demography: John L. Harper festschrift. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986. Alien plant invasion into the Intermountain West: a case history. Pages 191–213in H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake, eds., Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. Catalog of woes. Natural History 3/90:44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWhorter, C. G. 1971. Introduction and spread of Johnson grass in the United States. Weed Sci. 19: 496–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, M. E., and R. N. Mack. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol. 25:1009–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. F. 1978. Brazilian pepper—its impact on people, animals and the environment. Econ. Bot. 32:353–359.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muenscher, W. C. 1955. Weeds. 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York (reprinted in 1980 by Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York).

  • Munz, P. A. 1959.A California flora. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974. A flora of southern California. Univ. California Press. Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. M., andR. D. Henry. 1979. Changes in the alien flora in two west-central Illinois counties during the past 140 years. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 101:226–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1989. Field testing genetically modified organisms: framework for decisions. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, M. C. 1965. In gardens of Hawaii. Bernice P. Bishop Mus. Spec. Publ. 50. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okubo, A. 1980. Diffusion and ecological problems: mathematical models. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfound, W. T., and T. T. Earle. 1948. The biology of the water hyacinth. Ecol. Monogr. 18:447–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piggin, C. M. 1977. The herbaceous species ofEchium (Boraginaceae) naturalized in Australia. Muelleria 3:215–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, and C. R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, A. 1936. On the history of the introduction of woody plants into North America, (translated by E. M. Tucker.) Nat. Hort. Mag. 15:245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, H.N. 1930. The dispersal of plants throughout the world. L. Reeve, Kent, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbing, W. W. 1940. Alien plants growing without cultivation in California. Univ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 637.

  • Robinson, T. W. 1965. Introduction, spread and areal extent of saltcedar (Tamarix) in the western states. U.S.G.S. Prof. Pap. 491-A.

  • Roche, B. F., Jr., and C. J. Talbot. 1986. The collection history of centaureas found in Washington state. Wash. State Univ. Agric. Res. Center, Res. Bull. XB 0978.

  • Roper, D. C. 1917. The United States post office. Funk & Wagnells, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuttes, R. E. 1970. Random thoughts and queries on the botany ofCannabis. Pages 11–38in C. R. B. Joyce and S. H. Curry, eds. The botany and chemistry ofCannabis. J. & A. Churchill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sculthorpe, C. D. 1967. The biology of aquatic vascular plants. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.M. 1986. Native or introduced? Problems in the taxonomy and plant geography of some widely introduced annual brome-grasses. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 89B:273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern California Acclimatizing Association. 1895. Price List No. 3. (Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library, Seed and Nursery Collection).

  • Steyermark, J. A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State Univ., Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirton, C. H. 1977. Some thoughts on the polyploid complexLantana camara L. (Verbenaceae). Pages 321-340in D. P. Annecke, ed., Proc. Second Natl. Weeds Conf. South Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.

  • —, ed. 1983. Plant invaders: beautiful, but dangerous. 3rd ed. Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation of the Cape Provincial Administration, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, R. L. 1980. Distributional history ofLythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47:3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, D. G. 1984. Jointed goatgrass. Pacific Northwest Extension Publication, PNW 0256.

  • Toops, C. 1979. Invaders of the Everglades. Amer. Forests 85(8):38–41; 50-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters, and D. A. Webb, eds. 1968. Flora Europaea. Vol. 2. Rosaceae to Umbelliferae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters, and D. A. Webb, eds. 1972. Flora Europaea. Vol. 3. Diapensiaceae to Myoporaceae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, eds.. 1976. Flora Europaea. Vol. 4. Plantaginaceae to Compositae (and Rubiaceae). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, eds. 1980. Flora Europaea. Vol. 5. Alismataceae to Orchididaceae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1895. Eleventh census of the United States. 1890. Transportation business. Vol. 18. Part I. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. House. 55th Cong., 3rd sess. 1899. H. Doc. 91. Water hyacinth obstructions. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hylckama, T. E. A. 1974. Water use of the saltcedar as measured by the water budget method. U.S.G.S. Prof. Pap. 491-E.

  • Vietmeyer, N.D. 1975. The beautiful blue devil. Nat. Hist. 84(9):64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Breitenbach, F. 1989. National list of introduced trees. 2nd ed. Dendrological Foundation, Pretoria, South Africa.Webber, H.J. 1897. The water hyacinth. Dept. Agric. Bot. Div. Bull. 18.

  • Welch, S. L., N. D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L. C. Higgins. 1987. A Utah flora. Great Basin Naturalist Mem. 9.

  • Westbrooks, R. G. 1981. Introduction of foreign noxious plants into the United States. Weeds Today 12:16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. C. 1980. Purposefully introduced plants that have become noxious or poisonous weeds. Weed Sci. 28:300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. H. 1972. A handbook to plants in Victoria. Vol. II. Dicotyledons. Melbourne Univ. Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mack, R.N. The commercial seed trade: An early disperser of weeds in the United States. Econ Bot 45, 257–273 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862053

Keywords

Navigation