Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Farmer-based approach to conserving crop germplasm

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In situ conservation of crop genetic resources from centers of agricultural diversity is considered. This strategy has been rejected for several reasons, but other factors make it an important potential contributor to the overall conservation effort. Case studies of potato agriculture in Peru, maize agriculture in Mexico, and rice agriculture in Thailand indicate that farmers frequently engage in de facto conservation of landraces. Five principles should guide planning of in situ conservation: complementarity with off-site conservation, minimal institutional development, continuity with existing programs, meeting the development goals of increasing income and food, and accepting germplasm as an international public good. Four means to implement on-site conservation are presented: the institutional framework; the information base; the policy framework; and the role of grassroots organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Altieri, M. A., and L. C. Merrick. 1987. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Econ. Bot. 41:86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anikster, Y. 1988. The biological structure of native populations of wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum var.dicoccoides) in Israel—Resume of Research May 1984–May 1987. ms., USDA Agricultural Research Service, Oregon State Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., and G. Esteva. 1987. Food policy in Mexico. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J. H., and E. Christensen. 1988. Diversity compensation systems: ways to compensate developing nations for providing genetic materials. Pages 338–355in J. R. Kloppenburg, ed., Seeds and sovereignty. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellon, M. 1990. The ethnoecology of maize production under technological change. (Univ. California, Davis). Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI. Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. B. 1989. Rethinking crop genetic resource conservation. Conservation Biology 3:19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,M. Bellon, and E. Schmidt. 1988. Maize diversity and agricultural development in Mexico. Human Ecology 16:307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -,J. E. Taylor, and M. Bellon. n.d. Biological diversity and technology adoption in Andean potato agriculture. J. Development Economics, forthcoming.

  • Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT) 1986. Conservation of the wild relatives of maize. Pages 33–39in CIMMYT research highlights 1985. CIMMYT. Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, D. 1986. Development and spread of high- yielding rice varieties in developing countries. U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J. V. 1987. Farmer Management of Rice Variety Diversity in Northern Thailand. (Cornell Univ.). Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI. Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G. A., R. E. Just, andD. Zilberman. 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovation in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33:255–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Lloyd, B., and M. Jackson. 1986. Plant genetic resources: an introduction to their conservation and use. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. G. 1979. Evolution and polyploidy in potato species. Pages 637–646in J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester and A. D. Skelding, eds., The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Linnean Soc. Symposium Ser. No. 7.

  • —. 1983. The diversity of crop plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez X., E. 1985. Maize and man in the greater Southwest. Econ. Bot. 39:416–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huamán, Z. 1986. Conservation of potato genetic resources at CIP. Centro Int. de la Papa Circular 14:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. 1985. Ecogeographical surveying and in situ conservation of crop relatives. Report of an IBPGR Task Force, 30 July–1 August 1984, Washington, DC. IBPGR, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, R.E., and D. Zilberman. 1983. Stochastic structure, farm size, and technology adoption in developing agriculture. Oxford Economic Papers 35:307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledig, F. T. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. Pages 77–104in M. E. Soulé, ed., Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountjoy, D. C. 1988. Peasant occupational strategies in response to the Mexican economic crisis: Zinacantan in the 1980s. Center for Latin American Studies. Stanford University. Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigh, R. B. 1976. Evolutionary ecology of Maya agriculture in Highland Chiapas, Mexico. Dissertation, Anthropolgy, Stanford Univ. Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor.

  • Ochoa, C. 1975. Potato collecting expeditions in Chile, Bolivia and Peru, and the genetic erosion of indigenous cultivars. Pages 167–173in O. H. Frankel and J. G. Hawkes, eds., Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow IBP Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orestes Torres Ticona, L. 1984. Evaluatión de caracteristicas botánicas, agronomicas, fisicas, y químicas de cultivares nativos de papa, procedentes del departamento de Puno. Universidad National San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Peru. Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Paczka, R. 1973. Varicación en maíz y cambios socioeconomicas en Chiapas, Mexico 1946– 1971. Colegio de Postgraduados, ENA, Chapingo, Mexico. Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucknett, D. L., and N. Smith. 1982. Agricultural research and Third World food production. Science 217:215–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott-Allen, R., and C. Prescott-Allen. 1982. The case for in situ conservation of crop genetic resources. Nature and Resources 18:15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen, E., J. Roberts, L. M. Roberts, and E. Hernandez X. 1952. Races of maize in Mexico: their origin, characteristics, and distribution. The Bussey Institution, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, G. 1985. Germplasm conservation toward the year 2000: potential for new crops and enhancement of present crops. Pages 131–164in C. W. Yeatman, D. Kafton and H. G. Wilkes, eds., Plant genetic resources: a conservation imperative. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Behavioral Sciences, University of Caliifornia, 95616, Davis, CA

    Stephen B. Brush

Authors
  1. Stephen B. Brush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brush, S.B. A Farmer-based approach to conserving crop germplasm. Econ Bot 45, 153–165 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862044

Keywords

Search

Navigation