Conclusion
The commercial cultivars of mango have originated predominantly in India through seedling selections of the variants due to recombination and segregation of characters in the progenies. It has been found that suitable environment can help in wider diversity in the seedling progenies with much improved types as in Florida, where the Haden and other cultivars have bigger-sized fruits with more attractive colour than the parent Mulgoa with dull colour. The predominance of nucellar lines in Malaysia and the Philippines is possibly a result of genotype environment reaction. The nature of inheritance of this character should be studied more in detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Hamilton, R. A. and Warren Yee 1963. Mango Varieties in Hawaii. Punj. Hort. Jour.3: 311–16.
Miquel, F. A. G. 1859. Flora van Nederlandsch Indie1: 627–34.
Mukherjee, S. K. 1949a. A Monograph on the genus Mangifera Linn. Lloydia12: 73–136.
—. 1949b. The Mango and its wild relatives. Sci. & Cult.15: 5–9.
—. 1950a. Cytological Investigation on the Mango and the allied Indian species. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India16: 287–303.
-. 1950b. Mango: Its allopolyploid nature. Nature, Lond.166: 196.
—. 1950c. Wild mangoes of India. Sci. & Cult.15: 469–71.
—. 1951. Pollen analysis inMangifera L. in relation to Fruit-set and Taxonomy. J. Indian Bot. Soc.30: 49–55.
—. 1953a. Origin, distribution and phylogenetic affinity of the species ofMangiferaL. J. Linn. Soc. Lond.55: 65–83.
—. 1953b. Mango— its botany, cultivation, uses and future improvement. Econ. Bot.7: 130–62.
—. 1957. Cytology of some Malayan Species ofMangifera L. Cytologia22: 239–41.
—. 1963. Cytology and Breeding of Mango. Punj. Hort. Journ.3: 107–15.
—, and P. K. Majumder 1966. Genetics and Breeding of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. Indian J. Genet.26A: 155–67.
—, and R. N. Singh, P. K. Majumder and D. K. Sharma 1968. Present position regarding breeding of mango in India. Euphytica17: 462–67.
Purseglove, J. W. 1969. Some aspects of mango culture in the Western Tropics. Proc. Int. Symp. on Mango and Mango Culture, I.A.R.I., New Delhi.
Rumphius, G. E. 1741. Herbarium Amboinense1: 93–99.
Seward, A. C. 1912. Dicotyledonous leaves from Assam. Rec. Geol. Surv. India42: 100.
Singh, L. B. 1960. The Mango. Leonard Hill Ltd., London.
Singh, R. N., P. K. Majumder, D. K. Sharma and S. K. Mukherjee 1972. Some promising mango hybrids. Proc. Int. Symp. on Mango Culture, I.A.R.I., New Delhi, Acta Horticulturas24: 117-125.
Wolfe, H. S. 1963. The Mango Industry of Florida. Punj. Hort. Journ.3: 302–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukherjee, S.K. Origin of mango (Mangifera indica). Econ Bot 26, 260–264 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861039
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861039