Skip to main content
Log in

The inflorescence of Carex and related genera

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arber, A. 1925.Monocotyledons. A Morphological Study. Cambridge University Press.

  • Arnal, C. 1952. Essai sur la répartition des sexes chez lesCarex. Annls Univ. sarav.1: 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. 1957. Floral histogenesis in the monocotyledons. II. The Cyperaceae. Aust. J. Bot.5: 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BateSmith, E. C. 1969. Flavonoid patterns in the monocotyledons. InPerspectives in Phytochemistry (ed. J. B. Harborne & T. Swain), pp. 167–177. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaser, H. W. 1944. Studies in the morphology of the Cyperaceae. II. The prophyll. Am. J. Bot.31: 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruel, M. F. 1867. Observations organogéniques sur la fleur femelle desCarex. Ann. Sci. Nat., Sér. 7,5: 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, R. B. 1961. Fraser’s sedge,Cymophyllus fraseri (Andrews) Mackenzie. Castanea 26, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Core, E. L. 1955.Plant Taxonomy. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A. J. 1961.Morphology of the Angiosperms. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, J. S. 1970. Experimental studies inCarex sectionAcutae. D. Phil. Thesis. University of Oxford.

  • Faulkner, J. S. 1972. Chromosome studies onCarex section Acutae in north-west Europe. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.65: 271–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, J. 1838. De caricibus quibusdam. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., Sér. 2,10: 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S. 1844. Curious state ofCarex panicea. The Phytologist1: 462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, C. L. 1952. Phylogenetic development of the inflorescence and generic relationships in Kobresiaceae. Iowa State Coll. J. Sci.26: 210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilborn, O. 1924. Chromosome numbers and dimensions, species formation and phylogeny in the genusCarex. Hereditas5: 129–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilborn, O. 1939. Chromosome studies in Cyperaceae. III-IV. Hereditas25: 224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J. 1952. A reconsideration of plant teratology. Phyton, Horn4: 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J. 1957. The experimental modification of sex expression in flowering plants. Biol. Rev.32: 38–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J. 1958. The unisexual flower—a reply to criticism. Phytomorphology8: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J. 1961. The experimental control of sexuality and inflorescence structure inZea mays L. Proc. Linn. Soc.172: 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, T. 1896. Studies in the Cyperacae. II. The clado- and anthoprophyllon in the genusCarex. Am. J. Sci., Ser. 4,2: 214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holttum, R. E. 1948. The spikelet in Cyperaceae. Bot. Rev.14: 525–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jermy, A. C. & T. G. Tutin. 1968.British Sedges. London: Botanical Society of the British Isles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, B. R. 1967. Development and vasculature of the flowers ofLophotocarpus calycinus andSagittaria latifolia (Alismaceae). Am. J. Bot.54: 914–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, J. H. 1958. Flora Malesianae Precursores. XXI. Notes on Malaysian and some S.E. Asian Cyperaceae VII. Acta bot. neerl.7: 786–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, J. H. 1962. New look at some Cyperaceae mainly from the tropical stand-point. Adv. Sci.19: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, J. H. & T. J. Reichgelt. Flora Neerlandica 1 (3)Carex. Amsterdam.

  • Koyama, T. 1961. Classification of the family Cyperaceae (1). J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo8: 37–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyama, T. 1962. Classification of the family Cyperaceae (2). J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo8: 149–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyama, T. 1965. Interrelationships between the tribes Lagenocarpeae and Sclerieae. (Cyperaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Cl.92: 250–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama, T. 1967. Cyperaceae-Mapanioideae. In MAGUIRE, B., and collaborators: The botany of the Guyana Highlands VII. Mem. N.Y. Bot. Gard.17: 23–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyama, T. 1969. Delimitation and classification of the Cyperaceae-Mapanioideae. InCurrent Topics in Plant Science (ed. J. E. Gunckel), pp. 201–228. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyama, T. 1971. Systematic interrelationships among Sclerieae, Lagenocarpeae and Mapanieae (Cyperaceae). Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München10: 604–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreczetowicz, V. I. 1936. Are the sedges of subgenusPrimocarex Kük. primitive? J. Bot. U.R.S.S.21: 395–425. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kükenthal, G. 1909. Cyperaceae: Caricoideae.Das Pflanzenreich 4 (20): 1–824. Leipzig: Englemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen, I. 1963. Taxonomic studies on the genusAnthracoidea (Ustilaginales). Ann. bot. Soc. zool-bot. fenn. “Vanamo”34: 1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen, I. 1967a. Spikelet morphology and anatomy ofUncinia Pers. (Cyperaceae). Kew Bull.21: 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen, I. 1967b. Gedanken und Probleme zur Systematik der Familie Cyperaceae. Eine Zussamenfassung. Aquilo, Ser. Bot.6: 18–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunth, C. S. 1835. Uber die Natur des schlauchartigen Organs (utriculus) welches in der GattungCarex das pistill und später die Frucht einhullt. Wiegmann’s Archiv Naturgeschichte2: 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cohu, M. C. 1968. Remarques sur l’inflorescence femelle desCarex: interprétation de faits tératologiques. Bot. Rhedonica. Sér. A. No.5: 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levyns, M. R. 1945. A comparative study of the inflorescence in four species ofSchoenoxiphium and its significance in relation toCarex and its allies. Jl. S. Afr. Bot.11: 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J. L. 1939. Some observations on sexual dimorphism inCarex picta. Am. J. Bot.26: 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, M. T. 1896.Vegetable Teratology. London: The Ray Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattfeld, J. 1935. Zur Morphologie und Systematik der Cyperaceae. Proc. 6th Botan. Congr., Amsterdam,1: 330–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattfeld, J. 1938. Das morphologische Wesen und die phylogenetische Bedeutung der Blumenblätter. Ber. Deut. bot. Ges.56: 86–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C. R. 1969. Anatomy as an aid to classifying the Cyperaceae, Am. J. Bot.56: 782–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C. R. 1971.Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. V. Cyperaceae. Oxford University Press.

  • Meeuse, A. D. J. 1965. Angiosperms-past and present. Phylogenetic botany and interpretative floral morphology of the flowering plants. Advanc. Front. Pl. Sci.11: 1–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, L. E. 1960. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und vergleichenden Morphologie der Cyperaceen. Beitr. Biol. Pfl.35: 253–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora Osejo, L. E. 1966. Inflorescencias parciales deUncinia y agrupacion de las Caricoideae. Caldasia9: 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nees ab Esenbeck, C. G. 1835. Ubersicht der Cyperaceengattungen. Linnaea9: 273–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelmes, E. 1951. The genusCarex in Malaysia. Reinwardtia1: 221–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelmes, E. 1952. Facts and speculations on phylogeny in the tribe Cariceae of the Cyperaceae. Kew Bull.1951: 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohwi, J. 1936. On the subdivision of the genusCarex. Hyogoken Chutokyoiku Hakubutsugaku Zachi No. 1. Repr. 1–3. (In Japanese).

  • Savile, D. B. O. 1952. A study of the species ofCintractia onCarex, Kobresia andScirpus in Northern America. Can. J. Bot.30: 410–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savile, D. B. O., & J. A. Calder. 1953. Phylogeny ofCarex in the light of parasitism by the smut fungi. Can. J. Bot.31: 164–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieiden, M. J. 1849.Principles of Scientific Botany. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Motel, W. 1959a. Dulichieae, eine neue Tribus der Cyperaceae-Scirpoideae. Willdenowia2: 170–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Motel, W. 1959b. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und vergleichend morphologische Untersuchungen im Blutenbereich der Cyperaceae. Engl. Bot. Jahrb.78: 129–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, C. K. 1962. Floral morphology of Cyperaceae I. Naturaliste can.89: 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. L. 1966. Development of the inflorescence inCarex. Ann. Bot.30: 475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. L. 1967. The experimental control of inflorescence development inCarex. Ann. Bot.31: 19–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. L. 1969. The role of leaves and roots in the control of inflorescence development inCarex. Ann. Bot.33: 505–514.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, R. S. 1936. Anatomy of the spikelets and flowers ofCarex, Kobresia andUncinia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Cl.63: 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1973. Evolutionary trends in the inflorescence of angiosperms. Flora, Jena162: 501–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, H. A. 1940. Chromosome numbers and meiosis in the genusCarex. Am. J. Bot.27: 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D.L., Faulkner, J.S. The inflorescence of Carex and related genera. Bot. Rev 42, 53–81 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860862

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860862

Keywords

Navigation