Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Molecular Evidence and the Origin and Development of the Domesticated Sunflower (Helianthus annum, Asteraceae)

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The domesticated sunflower,Helianthus annuus, is an important economic crop, yet molecular data regarding its evolution are limited. Here we review morphological, geographical, archaeological, and molecular evidence pertaining to its origin and development. New isozyme and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) evidence is also presented.

Morphological, geographical, and archaeological evidence has led to the hypothesis that the domesticated sunflower was derived from a wild/weedy form ofH. annuus possibly in the Midwest. Molecular evidence was concordant with this hypothesis. A high degree of enzymatic and cpDNA sequence similarity was observed between wild and domesticatedH. annuus, and domesticatedH. annuus contained a subset of the alleles and cpDNAs found in wildH. annuus. The extensive polymorphism in the wild plants and the virtual monomorphism in cultivated lines for both isozyme and cpDNA phenotypes further suggest a single origin of the domesticated sunflower from a very limited gene pool. In addition, Native American varieties of the domesticated sunflower were genetically more variable than other cultivated lines, possibly indicating that they gave rise to the other cultivated stocks. Molecular evidence did not, however, allow conclusions as to the exact geographic origin of the domesticated sunflower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Anashchenko, A. 1974. On the taxonomy of the genusHelianthus L. Bot. Zhurn. 59:1472–1481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. 1952. Plants, man and life. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, D. L., and N. E. Asch. 1985. Prehistoric plant cultivation in west-central Illinois. Pages 149–204in R. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Anthrop. Pap. 75, Museum of Anthropology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. G., H. Bussey, and L. J. DesRosiers. 1986. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA, chloroplast DNA, and double-stranded RNA in fertile and cytoplasmic male-sterile sunflower (Helianthusannum). Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 28:121–129.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. M., M. George, Jr., and A. C. Wilson. 1979. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 76:1967–1971.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. M., C. Jan, and B. H. Beard. 1986. Chromosomal differentiation among the annualHelianthus species. Syst. Bot. 11:353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choumane, W., and P. Heizmann. 1988. Structure and variability of nuclear ribosomal genes in the genusHelianthus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:481–489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, D. J. 1983. Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from electrophoretic studies. Pages 257–287in S. D. Tanksley and T. J. Orton, eds., Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouzillat, D., P. Leroy, A. Perrault, and G. Ledoigt. 1987. Molecular analysis of the mitochondrial genome ofHelianthus annuus in relation to cytoplasmic male sterility and phylogeny. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:773–780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, H. O. 1978. Future of sunflower as an economic crop in North America and the world. Pages 457-488in J. F. Carter, ed., Sunflower science and technology. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dry, P. J., and J. J. Burdon. 1986. Genetic structure of natural populations of wild sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) in Australia. Austral. J. Biol. Sci. 30:255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand, N., A. M. Torres, and D. A. Levin. 1978. Density and the rate of apparent outcrossing inHelianthus annum. Syst. Bot. 3:403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fick, G. N. 1978. Breeding and genetics. Pages 279–338in J. F. Carter, ed., Sunflower science and technology. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Progr. Phytochem. 7:1–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M. R., and M. F. Conde. 1985. Functioning and variation of cytoplasmic genomes: lessons from cytoplasmic-nuclear interactions affecting male fertility in plants. Int. Rev. Cytol. 94:213–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B. 1949. Study in the evolution of the sunflower speciesHelianthus annuus andH. bolanderi. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 23:157–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1951a. Hybridization in the annual sunflowers:Helianthus annuus xH. argophyllus. Amer. Naturalist 85:64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1951b. The sunflower among the North American Indians. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 95:432–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1951c. Hybridization in the annual sunflowers:Helianthus annuus xH. debilis var.cucumerifolius. Evolution 5:42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1954. Variation and subspeciation in the common sunflower,Helianthus annuus. Amer. Midi. Naturalist 51:287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1956. Biosystematics ofHelianthus debilis. Madroño 13:145–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1958. Three new annual sunflowers (Helianthus) from the southwestern United States. Rhodora 60:271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1976a. Sunflowers. Pages 36–38in N. W. Simmonds, ed., Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1976b. The sunflower. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1978. Taxonomyof Helianthus and origin of domesticated sunflower. Pages 31–53in J. F. Carter, ed., Sunflower science and technology. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1982. Registration of Indiana— 1 cms sunflower germplasm. Crop Sei. (Madison) 22:1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1985. Some botanical considerations of the early domesticated plants north of Mexico. Pages 5 7–72in R. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Anthrop. Pap. 75, Museum of Anthropology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and D. M. Smith. 1955. New chromosome numbers inHelianthus and related genera. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 64:250–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—, S. Clevenger, and W. C. Martin. 1969. The North American sunflowers (Helianthus).Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 22:1–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, A. L., and C. L. Lay. 1985. Genetics of electrophoretic variants in the annual sunflower. J. Heredity 76:335–340.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leclercq, P. 1969. Une sterilite male cytoplasmique chez le tournesol. Ann. Amélior. PI. 19:99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, P., S. Bazetoux, L. Quetier, J. Belbut, and A. Berville. 1985. A comparison between mitochondrial DNA of an isogenic male-sterile (S) and male-fertile (F) couple (HA89) of sunflower. Curr. Genet. 9:245–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan, G. 1982. Sunflower of Indians of the southwest. Sunflower 8:30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Amer. Naturalist 106:283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and W. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A 76:5269–5273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Putt, E. D. 1978. History and present world status. Pages 1–30in J. F. Carter, ed., Sunflower science and technology. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H. 1987. A re-examination of introgression inHelianthus. Ph.D. Dissertation, Washington State Univ., Pullman.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, S. Beckstrom-Sternberg, and K. Doan. 1990a.Helianthus annuus ssp. texanus has chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal RNA genes ofHelianthus debilis ssp.cucumerifolius. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. (in press).

  • -, R. Carter, and S. Zona. 1990b. Molecular tests of the hypothesized hybrid origin of two diploidHelianthus species (Asteraceae). Evolution (in press).

  • — and M. Doyle. 1989. Allozyme variation inHelianthus praecox ssp. {hirtus} a rare sunflower from southern Texas. Aliso 12:379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and D. E. Soltis. 1987a. Phosphoglucomutase inHelianthus debilis a polymorphism for isozyme number. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 15:545–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — and — 1987b. Allozymic differentiation betweenTolmiea menziesii andTellima grandiflora (Saxifragaceae). Syst. Bot. 12:154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and — 1989. Assessing the utility of isozyme number for determining ploidal level: evidence fromHelianthus andHeliomeris (Asteraceae). Aliso 12:277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, and J. D. Palmer. 1988a. A molecular re-examination of introgression betweenHelianthus annuus andH. bolanderi (Compositae). Evolution 42:227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, —, and P. S. Soltis. 1988b. Genetic variation inHelianthus annuus andH. bolanderi. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 16:393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, E. E., and C. B. Heiser. 1981. An infrageneric classification ofHelianthus (Compositae). Taxon 30:393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siculella, L., and J. D. Palmer. 1988. Physical and gene organization of mitochondrial DNA in fertile and male sterile sunflower. CMS-associated alterations in structure and transcription of theatpA gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:3787–3799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., C. H. Haufler, D. C. Darrow, and G. J. Gastony. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. Amer. Fern J. 73:9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A. M. 1974. Genetics of sunflower alcohol dehydrogenase:Adh-2 non-linkage toAdh-1 andAdh-1 early alleles. Biochem. Genet. 12:385–392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — 1976. Dissociation-recombination of intergenic sunflower alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes and relative isozyme activities. Biochem. Genet. 14:87–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — 1983. Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.). Pages 329–338in S. D. Tanksley and T. J. Orton, eds., Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and U. Diedenhofen. 1976. The genetic control of sunflower seed acid phosphatase. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 18:709–716.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, and —. 1979. Baker sunflower populations revisited. J. Heredity 70:275–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, and I. M. Johnstone. 1977. Theearly allele of alcohol dehydrogenase in sunflower populations. J. Heredity 68:11–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wain, R. P. 1982. Genetic differentiation in the Florida subspecies ofHelianthus debilis (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 69:1573–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1983. Genetic differentiation during speciation in theHelianthus debilis complex. Evolution 37:1119–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J. 1985. The impact of early horticulture in the upland drainages of the Midwest and Midsouth. Pages 99–148in R. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Anthrop. Pap. 75, Museum of Anthropology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, E. D. P., and W. Dedio. 1980. Registration of sunflower germplasm composite crosses CMG-1, CMG-2 and CMG-3. Crop Sci. (Madison) 20:832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Graduate Program in Botany, 1500 North College Avenue, 91711, Claremont, CA

    Loren H. Rieseberg

  2. U.S.D.A.-A.R.S., Northern Crop Science Laboratory, 1307 North 18th Street, 58105, Fargo, ND

    Gerald J. Seiler

Authors
  1. Loren H. Rieseberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerald J. Seiler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rieseberg, L.H., Seiler, G.J. Molecular Evidence and the Origin and Development of the Domesticated Sunflower (Helianthus annum, Asteraceae). Econ Bot 44 (Suppl 3), 79–91 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860477

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860477

Keywords

Search

Navigation