Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genotypic control of chromosome form and behaviour

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beadle, G. W. 1930. Genetical and cytological studies of Mendelian asynapsis inZea mays. Cornell Univ. Exp. Sta., Mem.129: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1931. A gene in maize for supernumerary cell divisions following meiosis. Cornell Univ. Exp. Sta., Mem.135: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1932. A gene for sticky chromosomes inZea mays. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.63: 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. D. H., andSachs, L. 1953. Investigations in the Triticinae. II. The cytology and fertility of intergeneric and interspecific. F1 hybrids and their derived amphi-diploids. Jour. Agr. Sci.43: 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, A. D., Cartledge, J. L., andBlakeslee, A. F. 1934. Chromosome behaviour due to a gene which prevents metaphase pairing inDatura. Cytologia6: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, J. L. 1948. Abnormalidades meióticas en relación con la consanguinidad enZea mays L. Cons. Sup. Inv. Cient. Mision. Biol. Galicia. Madrid.

  • -. 1953. [Abstract in the Proc., IX Int. Genet. Congr.]

  • Bremer, G., andBremer-Reinders, D. E. 1954. Breeding of tetraploid rye in the Netherlands. I. Methods and cytological investigations. Euphytica3: 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brink, A. R., andWeyers, W. H. 1957. Invariable genetic change in maize plants heterozygous for marbled aleurone. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.43: 1053–1060.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, R. D. 1954. Fertility inLilium hybrids. Heredity8: 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955. Chromosome balance and endosperm failure in hyacinths. Heredity9: 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H. L. 1954. Variation in genetic recombination in natural populations. Symposium on genetic recombination. Jour. Cell. & Comp. Physiol.45Suppl. Z: 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, F. J. 1940. Cytogenetic studies of divergent meoitic spindle formation inZea mays. Amer. Jour. Bot.27: 547–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C.D. 1932. The control of the chromosomes by the genotype and its bearing on some evolutionary problems. Amer. Nat.66: 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. 1937. Recent Advances in Cytology.

  • -. 1949. The working units of heredity. Hereditas, Suppl. Vol. 189–200.

  • -. 1957. Messages and movements in the cell. Conference on Chromosomes. Wageningen: 199–231.

  • -. 1958. The Evolution of Genetic Systems. 2nd. ed.

  • - andMather, K. 1949. The Elements of Genetics.

  • — andThomas, P. E. 1937. The breakdown of cell division in aFestuca-Lolium derivative.Ann. Bot. 1: 747–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detlefsen, J. A., andRoberts, E. 1921. Studies on crossing over. I. The effect of selection on cross-over values. Jour. Exp. Zool.32: 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1951. Genetics and the Origin of Species.

  • Elliott, G. 1958. Environmental effects on the distribution of chiasmata among nuclei and bivalents and correlation between bivalents. Heredity12: 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emsweller, S. L., andJones, H. A. 1945. Further studies on the chiasmata of theAllium cepa ×A. fistulosum hybrid and its derivations. Amer. Jour. Bot.32: 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, N. H. 1940. Spontaneous chromosome aberrations inTradescentia. Genetics25: 69–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941. Spontaneous chromosome aberrations in triploidTradescantia hybrids. Genetics26: 632–649.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gowen, J.W. 1933. Meiosis as a genetic character inDrosophila melanogaster. Jour. Exp. Morph.65: 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, B. I. 1954. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics39: 789–809.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J. H. W., andMota, M. 1956. Non-synchronized meiosis in binucleate pollen mother cells of anAvena hybrid. Heredity.10: 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, H. K. 1957. Effect of high temperature on meiosis inLolium: nucleolar inactivation. Heredity11: 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J. L. 1954. The analysis of quantitative inheritance in a diallel cross ofNicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics39: 767–788.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. 1956. Species differentiation in Agrostis. II. The significance of chromosome pairing in the tetraploid hybrids ofAgrostis canina subsp.montana Hart.,A. tenuis Sibth. andA. stolonifera L. Jour. Genet.54: 337–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpechenko, G. D. 1928. Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativa L. ×Brassica oleracea L. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.39: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, P. C. 1954. Chromosome breakage. Progress of biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry4: 195–243.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klingsdedt, H.1939. Taxonomic and cytological studies on grasshopper hybrids. Jour. Genet.37: 389–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, R. 1936. Cytological studies on inbred rye. Hereditas31: 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C. W. 1958. Genotypic control of chromosome behaviour in rye. VI. Selection for disjunction frequency. Heredity12: 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. J. 1958. Genotypic control of crossing-over on the first chromosome ofDrosophila melanogaster. Nature182: 889–890.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I. M. 1954. Genetic Homeostasis. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesley, M. M., andFrost, H. B. 1927. Mendelian inheritance of chromosome shape inMatthiola. Genetics12: 449–460.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levan, A. 1936. Die Zytologie vonAllium cepa ×fistulosum. Hereditas21: 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1939. Amphivalent formation inAllium cernuum and its consequences in the pollen. Bot. Not.: 256–260.

  • — 1941. The cytology of the species hybridAllium cepa ×fistulosum and its polyploid derivatives. Hereditas27: 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. P., andLevine, E. E. 1955. Variable crossing over arising in different strains ofDrosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics40: 3: 399–405.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1953. Gene-environment interaction. A relationship between dominance, heterosis, phenotypic stability and variability. Heredity8: 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, T. 1937. Chiasma studies inAllium fistulosum, Allium cepa and their F1, F2 and backcross hybrids. Jap. Jour. Genet.13: 146–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942. Chiasma studies inAllium. Jap. Jour. Bot.12: 163–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. 1948. Nucleus and cytoplasm in differentiation. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.2: 196–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. The genetic control of stability in development. Heredity7: 297–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. Encyclopoedia of Plant Physiology. Vol. 15. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg [in press].

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. 1950. The origin and behaviour of mutable loci in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.36: 344–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1951. Chromosome organisation and genic expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.16: 13–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1953. Induction of instability at selected loci in maize. Genetics38: 579–599.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muntzing, A., andAkdik, S. 1948. Cytological disturbances in the first inbred generation of rye. Hereditas34: 485–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peto, F. H. 1938. Cytology of poplar species and natural hybrids. Canad. Jour. Res.16: 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, J., andHuskins, C. L. 1931. The cytology ofMatthiola incana R. Br., especially in relation to the inheritance of double flowers. Jour. Genet.24: 359–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, R. 1943. Studies of asynapsis in rye. Hereditas29: 475–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, R., andMuntzing, A. 1942. A meiotic peculiarity in rye, simulating a terminal centromere. Hereditas28: 442–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H. 1955a. Genotypic control of chromosome behaviour in rye. I. Inbred lines. Heredity9: 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955b. Heterosis in chromosome behaviour. Proc. Roy. Soc. B.144: 150–159.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. Genotypic control of chromosome behaviour in rye. IV. The origin of new variation. Heredity11: 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957b. Distribution of chiasmata in an asynaptic Locust. Nature180: 559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1958a. Differential behaviour of chromosomes inScilla. Chromosoma9: 185–192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — andThompson, J. B. 1955. Localization of chromosome breakage at meiosis. Heredity9: 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1956. Genotypic control of chromosome behaviour in rye. III. Chiasma frequency in homozygotes and heterozygotes. Heredity10: 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1958. Genotypic control of chromosome behaviour in rye. V. The distribution pattern of chiasmata between pollen mother cells. Heredity12: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. M. 1947. Crossover chromosomes in unreduced gametes of asynaptic maize. Genetics32: 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1952. Preferential segregation in maize. Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames: 66–80.

  • — andVilkomerson, H. 1942. On the anaphase movement of chromosomes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.28: 433–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. M. 1935. Meiosis inCrepis. I and II. Jour. Genet.31: 101–117, 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley R., andChapman, V., Riley R., andChapman, V., 1958. Genetic control of the cytologically diploid behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature182: 713–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutishauser, A. 1954. Entwicklungserregung der Eizelle bei pseudogamen Arten der GattungRanunculus. Bull. Schweiz. Akad. Med. Wiss.10: 491–512.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — andLa Cour, L. F. 1956. Spontaneous chromosome breakage in endosperm. Nature177: 324–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, L. 1952. Chromosome mosaics in experimental amphidiploids in the Triticinae. Heredity6: 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slizynski, B. M. 1955. Chiasmata in the male mouse. Jour. Genet.53: 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonmann, W. 1938. Der diploid bastard,Triton palmatus ∓ ×Salamandra ♂. Wilhelm Roux’ Arch.Entwicklungsmech. Organ.138: 345–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, E. R. 1941. Inviability of intergeneric hybrids involvingTriticum monococcum andT. aegilopoides. Genetics29: 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. 1942. Cytogenetics of a factor for multiploid sporocytes in barley. Amer. Jour. Bot.29: 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, K. 1936. Somatic crossing over and segregation inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics29: 451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1958. The inviability, weakness, and sterility of interspecific hybrids. Adv. Genet.9: 147–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. 1929. Theclaret mutant type ofDrosophila simulons: a study of chromosome elimination and of cell lineage. Zeits. Wiss Zool.135: 325–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andDobzhansky, T. 1936. Geographical distribution and cytology of “sex-ratio” inDrosophila pseudoobscura and related species. Genetics21:473–490.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, C. P. 1957. Cytology and Cyto-genetics. Prentice-Hall Inc.

  • Thoday, J. M. 1953. Components of fitness. Symp Soc. Exp. Biol.7: 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • - andBoam, J. 1956. A possible effect of the cytoplasm on recombination inD. melanogaster Jour. Genet.54.

  • Thomas, P. T. 1936. Genotypic control of chromosome size. Nature138: 195–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, A., andBruhin, A. 1948. Zytologie und Genetik der schweizerischen Crepis-Arten. Archiv Julius Klaus-Stiftung.24: 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, M. S. 1957. Studies of spontaneous chromosome breakage in interspecific hybrids of Bromus. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.28(6): 335–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J. D. 1954. Animal Cytology and Evolution. 2nd ed., Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England

    H. Rees

  2. University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Wales

    H. Rees

Authors
  1. H. Rees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rees, H. Genotypic control of chromosome form and behaviour. Bot. Rev 27, 288–318 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860084

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860084

Keywords

Search

Navigation