Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The child with micropenis

  • Symposium: Pediatric Endocrinology — II
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micropenis refers to an extremely small penis with a stretched penile length of less than 2.5 SD below the mean for age or stage of sexual development. It should be differentiated from a buried or hidden penis and aphallia. It is important to use a standard technique of stretched penile measurement and nomograms for age to identify children with micropenis. All children above 1 year of age with a stretched penile length of less than 1.9 cm need evaluation. Based on etiology they can be classified as hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (hypothalamic or pituitary failure), hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (testicular failure), partial androgen insensitivity syndrome and idiopathic groups. The help of a pediatric endocrinologist, geneticist, pediatric surgeon and/or urologist is often necessary. Growth velocity is an important determinant of associated hypothalamic or pituitary pathology. GnRH and/or hCG stimulation tests are often helpful in evaluating the etiology. Similarly chromosomal studies are indicated in a few. Often the diagnosis is inferred by the presence of clinical features suggestive of a syndrome usually associated with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Irrespective of the underlying cause a short course of testosterone should be tried in patients with micropenis and an assessment of the penis to respond should be made. Transdermal DHT has also been reported to be effective in prepubertal children. Children with hypopituitarism and GH deficiency respond to appropriate hormonal therapy. Surgical correction is not indicated in the common endocrine types of micropenis. Many studies have shown that most testosterone treated children have satisfactory gain in length of penis and sexual function. Thus sexual reassignment is done very infrequently now.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee PA, Mazur T, Danish Ret al. Micropenis I. Criteria, etiologies and classification.John Hopkins Med J 1980; 146: 156–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergeson PS, Hopkin RJ, Bailey RB, McGill LC, Piatt JP. The inconspicuous penis.Pediatrics 1993; 92: 794–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skoog SJ, Belman AB. Aphallia: Its classification and management.J Urol 1989; 141: 589.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levitt SB, Smith RB, Ship AG. Iatrogenic microphallus secondary to circumcision.Urology 1976; 8: 472–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman KW, Smith DW. Fetal phallic growth and penile standards for newborn male infants.J Pediatr 1975; 86: 395–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schonfeld WA, Beech GW. Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity.J Urol 1942; 48: 759–77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schonfeld WA. Primary and secondary sex characteristics.Am J Dis Child 1943; 65: 535.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore.J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000; 13: 55–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuladhar R, Davis PG, Batch J, Doyle LW. Establishment of a normal range of penile length in preterm infants.J. Paediatr Child Health 1998; 34: 471–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Danish RK, Lee PA, Mazur T, Amrhein JA, Migeon CJ. Micropenis II. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.John Hopkins Med J 1980; 146: 177–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee PA, Danish RK, Mazur T, Migeon CJ. Micropenis III. Primary hypogonadism, partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, and idiopathic disorders.John Hopkins Med J 1980; 147: 175–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Verma IC, Mathews AR, Rohatgi M, Menon PSN. Etiology of isolated congenital micropenis.Indian J Med Res 1987; 86: 733–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh PC, Wilson JD, Allen TDet al. Clinical and endocrinological evaluation of patients with congenital microphallus.J Urol 1978; 120: 90–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Allen TD. Microphallus: Clinical and endocrine characteristics.J Urol 1978; 119: 750–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Savage MO, Blum WF, Ranke MBet al. Clinical features and endocrine status in patients with growth hormone insensitivity (Laron syndrome).J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993; 77: 1465–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Urzola A, Leger J. Czernichow P. Three cases of congenital growth hormone deficiency with micropenis and hypospadias: What does growth hormone have to do with it?Horm Res 1999; 51: 101–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gad YZ, Nasr H, Mazen I, Salah N, el Ridi R. 5 alpha-reductase deficiency in patients with micropenis.J Inherit Metab Dis 1997; 20: 95–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bourgeois MJ, Jones B, Waagner DC, Dunn D. Micropenis and congenital adrenal hypoplasia.Am J Perinatol 1989; 6: 69–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans BA, Williams DM, Hughes IA. Normal postnatal androgen production and action in isolated micropenis and isolated hypospadias.Arch Dis Child 1991; 66: 1033–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludwig G. Micropenis and apparent micropenis-a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.Andrologia 1999; 31 (Suppl 1): 27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritzen M, Hintz RL. Micropenis at one year of age to puberty. In: Zochberg Z, ed.Practical Algorithms in Pediatric Endocrinology. Basel; Karger, 1999; 34–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grant DB, Laurence BM, Atherden SM, Ryness J. HCG stimulation test in children with abnormal sexual development.Arch Dis Child 1976; 51: 596–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dissanevate P, Warne GL, Zacharin MR. Clinical evaluation in isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (Kallmann syndrome).J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 1998; 11: 631–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Amrhein JA, Meyer WJ, Danish RK, Migeon CJ. Studies of androgen function and binding in 13 male pseudohermaphrodites and 13 males with micropenis.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1977; 45: 732–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: Medical and surgical implications.J Urol 1994; 152: 4–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Guthrie RD, Smith DW, Graham CB. Testosterone treatment for micropenis during childhood.J Pediatr 1973; 83: 247–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Burstein S, Grumbach MM, Kaplan SL. Early determination of androgen responsiveness is important in the management of microphallus.Lancet 1979; 2: 983–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kogan SJ, Willian DI. The micropenis syndrome: Clinical observations and expectations for growth.J Urol 1977; 118: 311–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ben-Galim E, Hillman RE, Weldon VV. Topically applied testosterone and phallic growth. Its effects in male children with hypopituitarism and microphallus.Am J Dis Child 1980; 134: 296–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Choi SK, Han SW, Kim DH, de Lignieres B. Transdermal dihydrotestosterone therapy and its effects on patients with microphallus.J Urol 1993; 150: 657–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Swerdloff RS, Wang C. Dihydrotestosterone: A rationale for its use as a nonaromatizable androgen replacement agent.Bailliers Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 12: 501–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tietjen DN, Uramoto GY, Tindall DJ, Husmann DA. Characterization of penile androgen receptor expression in micropenis due to hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.J Urol 1998; 160: 1075–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tietjen DN, Uramoto GY, Tindall DJ, Husmann DA. Micropenis in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: Response of the penile androgen receptor to testosterone action.J Urol 1998; 160: 1054–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McMahon DR, Kramer SA, Husmann DA. Micropenis: Does early treatment with testosterone do more harm than good?J Urol 1995; 154: 825–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Husmann DA, Cain MP. Microphallus: Eventual phallic size is dependent on the timing of androgen administration.J Urol 1994; 152: 734–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bin-Abbas B, Conte FA, Grumbach MM, Kaplan SL. Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and micropenis: Effects of testosterone treatment on adult penile size. Why sex reversal is not indicated.J Pediatr 1999; 134: 579–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Levy JB, Husmann DA. Micropenis secondary to growth hormone deficiency: Does treatment with growth hormone alone result in adequate penile growth?J Urol 1996; 156: 214–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Reilly JM, Woodhouse CR. Small penis and the male sexual role.J Urol 1989; 142: 569–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Woodhouse CR. The sexual and reproductive consequence of congenital genitourinary anomalies.J Urol 1994; 152: 645–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hinman F Jr. Microphallus: Distinction between anomalous and endocrine types.J Urol 1980; 123: 412–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. van Seters AP, Slob AK. Mutually gratifying heterosexual relationship with micropenis of husband.J Sex Marital Ther 1988; 14: 98–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Horton CE, Vorstman B, Teasley D, Winslow B. Hidden penis release: Adjunctive suprapubic lipectomy.Ann Plast Surg 1987; 19: 131–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Almaguer MC, Saenger P, Linder BL. Phallic growth after hCG. A clinical index of androgen responsiveness.Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1993; 32: 329–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110 029, New Delhi

    P. S. N. Menon (Additional Professor) & Umakanth A. Khatwa

Authors
  1. P. S. N. Menon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Umakanth A. Khatwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menon, P.S.N., Khatwa, U.A. The child with micropenis. Indian J Pediatr 67, 455–460 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859468

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859468

Key words

Search

Navigation