Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introgression re-examined

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Adams, R. P. &B. L. Turner. 1970. Natural populations ofJuniperus ashei Buch. Taxon19: 728–751.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, R. E. &B. L. Turner. 1962. New techniques in analysis of complex natural hybridization. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences48: 130–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Edgar. 1948. Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution2: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1953. Introgressive hybridization. Biol. Rev.28: 280–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1961. The analysis of variation in cultivated plants with special reference to introgression. Euphytica10: 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &Leslie Hubricht. 1938. The evidence for introgressive hybridization. Amer. Jour. Bot.25: 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &G. L. Stebbins, Jr. 1954. Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution8: 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &R. E. Woodson. 1935. The species ofTradescantia indigenous to the United States. Contrib. Arnold Arb.9: 1–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G. 1951. Hybridization and natural gene-flow between higher plants. Biol. Rev.26: 302–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, U. C. &E. S. Barghoorn. 1973. Palynological evidence for natural introgression betweenTripsacum andZea. (abstract). Amer. Jour. Bot.60: no. 4, suppl. p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, H. N. &W. D. Jackson. 1957. Natural selection in action inEucalyptus. Nature179: 1267–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, R. S. 1965. Hybrid zones and reproductive isolation. Evolution19: 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, W. F. 1951. Interbreeding of natural populations of vertebrates. Amer. Nat.85: 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, F. N. &P. F. Knowles. 1967. Introduction to Plant Breeding. Reinhold, N. Y.

  • Carlisle, A. &A. H. F. Brown. 1965. The assessment of the taxonomic status of mixed oak (Quercus spp.) populations. Watsonia6: 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. C. &B. G. Brehm. 1969. Chemical and morphological analysis of introgressive hybridization betweenIris tenax andI. chrysophylla. Brittonia21: 44–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Yaw-En &Hiko-Ichi Oka. 1970. Introgression across isolating barriers in wild and cultivatedOryza species. Evolution24: 344–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, W. P., J. M. Tucker &Rudy Drobnick. 1959. Some clues to Great Basin postglacial climates provided by oak distributions. Ecology40: 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousens, J. E. 1964. Variation of some diagnostic characters of the sessile and pedunculate oaks and their hybrids in Scotland. Watsonia5: 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. The status of pedunculate and sessile oaks in Britain. Watsonia6: 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessauer, Herbert C., Wade Fox &F. Harvey Pough. 1962. Starch-gel electrophoresis of transferrins, esterases and other plasma proteins of hybrids between two subspecies of whiptail lizard (genusCnemidophorus). Copeia1962: 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1941. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1973. Is there gene exchange betweenDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis in their natural habitat? Amer. Nat.107: 313–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doggett, H. &B. N. Majisu. 1968. Disruptive selection in crop improvement. Heredity23: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R. &P. H. Raven. 1969. Differentiation of populations. Science165: 1228–1232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flake, R. H., Ernst Von Rudloff &B. L. Turner. 1969. Quantitative study of clinal variation inJuniperus virginiana using terpenoid data. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences64: 487–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. W. 1968. The frequency of interbreeding between two sibling species ofDacus (Diptera) in wild populations. Evolution22: 667–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, George W. 1972. The role of hybridization in the evolution of the Hawaiian flora. pp. 205–219 in D. H. Valentine, ed., Taxonomy, phytogeography and evolution. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Verne. 1950. Genetic and taxonomic studies inGila. Aliso2: 239–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1971. Plant Speciation. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, E. G. &D. A. Levin. 1969a. Species contact inPhlox: control and response. Amer. Midl. Nat.82: 490–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1969b. Physiological evidence of hybridization and reticulate evolution inPhlox maculata. Amer. Jour. Bot.56: 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, Jack R. &J. M. J. de Wet. 1963. The compilospecies concept. Evolution17: 497–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B. 1949a. Natural hybridization with particular reference to introgression. Bot. Rev.15: 645–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949b. Study in the evolution of the sunflower speciesHelianthus annum andH. Bolanderi. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.23: 157–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1951. Hybridization in the annual sunflowers:Helianthus annum × H. debilis var.cucumerifolius. Evolution5: 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1961. Natural hybridization and introgression with particular reference toHelianthus. Recent Advances in Botany1: 874–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,D. M. Smith, S. Clevenger &W. C. Martin. 1969. The North American sunflowers (Helianthus). Mem. Torrey Bot. Club.22: 1–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, James F. 1973. The phenetics and ecology of a narrow hybrid zone. Evolution27: 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. C. &A. T. Guard. 1957. Analysis of some natural and artificial hybrids inHelianthus. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci.66: 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A. 1963. Natural hybridization betweenPhlox maculata andP. glaberrima and its evolutionary significance. Amer. Jour. Bot.50: 714–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1966. Chromatographic evidence of hybridization and evolution inPhlox maculata. Amer. Jour. Bot.53: 238–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967a. Hybridization between annual species ofPhlox: population structure. Amer. Jour. Bot.54: 1122–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967b. Variation inPhlox divaricata. Evolution21: 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1971. The origin of reproductive isolating mechanisms in flowering plants. Taxon20: 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &Barbara Schaal. 1972. Seed protein polymorphism inPhlox pilosa. Brittonia24: 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &Dale M. Smith. 1966. Hybridization and evolution in thePhlox pilosa complex. Amer. Nat.100: 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. &L. C. Birch. 1966. Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution20: 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, Robert W. 1961. Biosystematics of two perennial species ofHelianthus (Compositae), II. Natural populations and taxonomy. Brittonia13: 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1961. Introgression in maize. Euphytica10: 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. 1953. The genetical structure of populations. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.7: 66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955. Polymorphism as an outcome of disruptive selection. Evolution9: 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maze, Jack. 1968. Past hybridization betweenQuercus macrocarpa andQuercus gambelii. Brittonia20: 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, J. &R. E. Alston. 1964. Utilization of chemical patterns in the analysis of hybridization betweenBaptisia leucantha andB. sphaerocarpa. Evolution18: 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. M. 1959. Population studies onViola lactea Sm. and its wild hybrids. Evolution13: 318–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, J. J. &L. E. Mettler. 1969. Relative fitness of introgressed and parental populations ofDrosophila mojavensis andD. arizonensis. Evolution23: 519–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R. 1967. Hybridization and regional variation in Pacific NorthwesternImpatiens (Balsaminaceae). Brittonia19: 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panetsos, C. A. &H. G. Baker. 1967. The origin of variation in “wild”Raphanus sativus in California. Genetica38: 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, R. F. &J. B. Kirkpatrick. 1972. Possible phantom hybrids inEucalyptus. New Phytol.71: 1213–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazy, Batia &D. Zohary. 1965. The process of introgression betweenAegilops polyploids: Natural hybridization between A.variabilis, A. ovata andA. biuncialis. Evolution19: 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipkin, Sarah Bedichek. 1968. Introgression between closely related species ofDrosophila in Panama. Evolution22: 140–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1972. Cytological evidence of introgression betweenDrosophila species in Panama. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.59: 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, L. F., Ira Nelson &R. L. Plaisted. 1967. Negative evidence of introgression affecting the stability of LouisianaIris species. Cornell Univ. Agr. Expt. Stat. Memoir 398.

  • Raven, P. H. 1972. Evolution and endemism in the New Zealand species ofEpilobium. pp. 259–274 in D. H. Valentine, ed., Taxonomy, phytogeography and evolution. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, C. L. 1968. Suture-zones of hybrid interactions between recently joined biotas. Evol. Biol.2: 321–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, Charles M. 1958. The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomatoes of western South America. Econ. Bot.12: 346–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, Reed C. 1957. Interspecific hybridization inLesquerella (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. no. 181: 1–40.

  • - &Otto T. Solbrig. 1973. Interspecific hybridization inLesquerella. Contrib. Gray Herb. no. 203: 3–48.

  • Shinners, Lloyd H. 1956. Phylogeny in five dimensions. Paper delivered at Symposium of the Missouri Botanical Garden. (Mimeo.)

  • Short, Lester L. 1956. Hybridization in the flickers (Colaptes) of North America. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.129: 307–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969. Taxonomic aspects of avian hybridization. Auk86: 84–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1972. Hybridization, taxonomy and avian evolution. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.59: 447–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G. 1954. Hybridization in the red-eyed towhees of Mexico. Evolution8: 252–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. The evolutionary and taxonomic significance of sexual dimorphism and hybridization in birds. Condor59: 166–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1961. Hybridization and isolating mechanisms, in W. F. Blair, ed., Vertebrate speciation. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &Lester L. Short, Jr. 1964. Hybridization in the orioles of the Great Plains. Condor66: 130–150. 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoons, Frederick J. 1968. A ceremonial ox of India. Univ. Wisc. Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dale. 1961. Variation in the tetraploid sunflowers,Helianthus decapetalus, H. hirsutus, andH. strumosus. Recent Advances in Botany.1: 878–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., Jr. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc.103: 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969. The significance of hybridization for plant taxonomy and evolution. Taxon18: 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &K. Daly. 1961. Changes in the variation pattern of a hybrid population ofHelianthus over an eight-year period. Evolution15: 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutz, H. C. &L. K. Thomas. 1964. Hybridization and introgression inCowania andPurshia. Evolution18: 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoday, J. M. 1964. Effects of selection for genetic diversity. Genetics Today3: 533–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, John M. 1953. The relationship betweenQuercus dumosa andQuercus turbinella. Madroño12: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &C. H. Muller. 1956. The geographic history ofQuercus ajoensis. Evolution10: 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, John R. G. 1971. Two thousand generations of hybridization in aHeliconius butterfly. Evolution25: 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turrill, W. B. 1934. The correlation of morphological variation with distribution in some species ofAjuga. New Phyt.33: 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugent, Donald. 1970. The potato. Science170: 1161–1166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Aliza &D. Zohary. 1967. Introgression in wheat via triploid hybrids. Heredity22: 541–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov, N. I. 1922. The law of homologous series in variation. Jour. Genet.12: 47–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. H., Jr. 1969. The role and taxonomic treatment of hybrids. Bioscience19: 785–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1970. Biosystematics and evolutionary noise. Taxon19: 146–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J. R. 1970. Experimental introgression in the genusPhaseolus. I. Effect of mating system on interspecific gene flow. Evolution24: 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, H. Garrison. 1970. Teosinte introgression in the maize of the Nobogame Valley. Bot. Mus. Leaf., Harvard Univ.22: 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, R. E., Jr. 1947. Some dynamics of leaf variation inAsclepias tuberose. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.34: 353–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962. Butterflyweed revisited. Evolution16: 168–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhukovskii, P. M. 1970. Spontaneous and experimental introgression, its role in evolution and breeding. Soviet Genetics6: 449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, Daniel. 1969. The progenitors of wheat and barley in relation to domestication and agricultural dispersal in the Old World, p. 47–66 in P. J. Ucko and G. W. Dimbleby (eds.), The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington

    Charles B. Heiser

Authors
  1. Charles B. Heiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heiser, C.B. Introgression re-examined. Bot. Rev 39, 347–366 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859160

Keywords

Search

Navigation