Skip to main content
Log in

Development policy, forests, and peasant farms: Reflections on Huastec-managed forests’ contributions to commercial production and resource conservation

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Huastec Indians of northeastern Mexico manage their forests in an indigenous system that integrates commercial and subsistence production. Elements of primary and secondary forest coexist with introduced species in this diverse silvicultural structure which complements the swidden and permanent agriculture fields of the Huastec farmstead. The forest’s direct production of the food, timber, and fuel resources discussed here buffers the Huastec peasant family against market fluctuations and the failed harvest of a single crop. The Huastec system of forest management offers an alternative pattern to the agroforestry and plantation schemes now being suggested for development in the tropics. It is an alternative that provides protection for wild genetic resources while it contributes to the combination of commercial and subsistence agriculture so important for the successful modernization of peasant agriculture. The documentation of this system demonstrates that ethnobotanists and economic botanists have an important but unrealized role to play in the protection of biotic resources and in the development of sustained yield agroecosystems for peasants. The contributions of ethnobotanists are particularly valuable because they can find where and why useful wild species persist in agroecosystems. A greater effort to direct the attentions of policy makers to the value of ethnobotanical knowledge is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adeyoju, S. K. 1976. Land use and tenure in the tropics. Unasylva 28 (112–113): 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcorn, J. B. 1981a. Huastec noncrop resource management. Human Ecology 9: 395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981b. Some factors influencing botanical resource perception among the Huastec: Suggestions for future ethnobotanical inquiry. J. Ethnobiol. 1: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1983. El te’lom Huasteco: Presente, pasado y future de un sistema de silviculture indígena. Biótica 8: 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. Huastec Mayan Ethnobotany. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and C. Hernández V. 1983. Plants of the Huastecan region of Mexico with an analysis of their Huastec names. J. Mayan Ling. 4: 11–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1978. Drug policies and management: medicinal plants. WHO Document WHA31.33. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Aspelin, P. L. 1975. External Articulation and Domestic Production: The Artifact Trade of the Mamainde of Northwestern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Unpubl. PhD. diss. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.

  • Baer, R. 1983. Response to Fleuret and Fleuret (1983). Cult. & Agric. 21: 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D., E. Modiakgotla, D. Norman, J. Siebert, and M. Tjirongo. 1983. Helping the limited resource farmer through the farming systems approach to research. Cult. & Agric. 19: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, P. F. 1980. Adaptive strategies in peasant agricultural production. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 9: 545–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, A. 1979. La etnobotánica.In Barrera, A., ed, La Etnobotanica. INIREB, Xalapa.

  • Bowonder, B. 1983. Forest depletion: Some policy options. Resources Policy 1983: 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. D. 1981. The State’s responsibilities for the protection and preservation of forestry resources.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budowski, G. 1981. The place of agro-forestry in managing tropical forests.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero N., J. 1979. Perspectivas para el quehacer etnobotánica en México.In Barrera, A., ed, La Etnobotánica. INIREB, Xalapa.

  • Chacón, J. C, and S. R. Gliessman. 1982. Use of the non-weed concept in traditional tropical agroecosystems of south-eastern Mexico. Agro-Ecosystems 8: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, W. C. 1976. Maintenance of agriculture and human habitats within the tropical forest ecosystem. Human Ecology 4: 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, H. C. 1980. Ethnographic Atlas of Ifugao. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. W., and M. D. Atkins. 1979. Agricultural Ecology: An Analysis of World Food Production Systems. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, K. A. 1979. Beyond the Green Revolution. Plenum, New York,

    Google Scholar 

  • de las Salas, G., ed. 1979. Proceedings, Workshop: Agroforestry systems in Latin America. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica.

  • Denevan, W. M. 1981. Swiddens and cattle versus forest: The imminent demise of the Amazon rain forest reexamined. Stud. Third World Societies 13: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, J. M. Treacy, J. B. Alcorn, C. Padoch, J. Denslow, and S. Flores Paitan. 1984. Indigenous agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon: Bora Indian management of swidden fallows.In Hemming, J., ed, Change in the Amazon Basin: Man’s Impact on Forests and Rivers. Univ. Manchester Press, Manchester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewalt, B. 1982. The big macro connection: Population, grain, cattle in S. Honduras. Cult. & Agric. 14: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, K. G. 1981. Nutritional consequences of the transformation from subsistence to commercial agriculture in Tabasco, Mexico. Human Ecology 9: 151–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. 1980. Tropical succession: Manifold routes to maturity. Biotropica 12 (Supplement, Tropical Succession): 2–7.

  • Fleuret, P., and A. Fleuret. 1980. Nutrition, consumption, and agricultural change. Human Organization 39: 250–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleuret, P., and A. Fleuret. 1983. Socioeconomic determinants of child nutrition in Taita, Kenya: A call for discussion. Cult. & Agric. 19: 8, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores Rodas, M. A. 1981. Forestry for rural development—new approach.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, B. 1969. Eastern Nigeria. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, F. 1971. India’s Green Revolution: Economic Gains and Political Costs. Princeton Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. 1977. How the Other Half Dies: The Real Reasons for World Hunger. Allanheld, Osmun, Montclair, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, E. H., and H. D. Thurston. 1978. Traditional and modern crop protection in perspective. BioScience 28: 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R., R. García E., and M. Amador A. 1981. The ecological basis for the application of traditional agricultural technology in the management of tropical agro-ecosystems. Agro-Ecosystems 7: 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Pompa, A. 1982. La Etnobotánica en México. Biótica 7: 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and F. Golley. 1980. Sintesis, conclusiones y recomendaciones: Seminario de Trabajo sobre Estrategias del Uso del Suelo y sus Recursos por las Culturas Mesoamericanas y su Aplicación para Satisfacer las Demandas Actuales. Biótica 5: 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. L. 1982. A Panama Forest and Shore. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandstaff, T. 1978. The development of swidden agriculture (shifting cultivation). Developm. & Change 9: 547–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, D. J. 1975. Bringing the Green Revolution to the shifting cultivator. Science 190: 841–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen, H. M. 1981. Environmental constraints versus economic gains in tropical forestry.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, L. 1981. The cultural ecology of economic development. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr. 71: 220–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudeman, S. 1978. The Demise of a Rural Economy: From Subsistence to Capitalism in a Latin American Village. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, England. or]Guess, G. M. 1979. Pasture expansion, forestry, and development contradictions: The case of Costa Rica. Stud. Comp. Int. Developm. Spring 1979: 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J. 1982. Capitalism and Peasant Farming. Oxford Univ. Press, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. D. 1980. A natural ecosystem analog approach to the design of a successional crop system for tropical forest environments. Biotropica 12 (Supplement, Tropical Succession): 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huguet, L. 1978. Symbiosis of agriculture and forestry. Unasylva 30: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. R., and F. R. Buttel. 1982. Environment, Energy, and Society. Wadsworth, Belmont, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. 1979. Chayanov’s model of peasant household resource allocation. J. Peasant Stud. 6: 247–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN-UNEP-WWF. 1980. World Conservation Strategy: Living Resources Conservation for Sustainable Development. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H. 1973. Tropical agroecosystems. Science 182: 1212–1219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kundstadter, P. 1978. Ecological modification and adaptation: An ethnobotanical view of Lua’ swiddeners in northwest Thailand.In Ford, R. I., ed, The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany, Anthropol. Pap. No. 67, Museum Anthropology, Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappe, F. M., and J. Collins. 1978. Food First. Ballantine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. 1977. Where contradictory theory and practice co-exist. Unasylva 29 115: 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, A., and N. Johnson. 1981. Forest plantations in Kalimantan, Indonesia.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergen, F., ed. 1981. Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. 1980. Conversion of Tropical Moist Forests. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nations, J. D., and D. I. Komer. 1982. Indians, immigrants and beef exports: Deforestation in Central America. Cult. Survival Quart. 6: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and R. B. Nigh. 1980. The evolutionary potential of Lacandon Maya sustained-yield tropical forest agriculture. J. Anthropol. Res. 36: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwoboshi, L. C. 1981. Soil productivity aspects of agri-silviculture in the West African rain forest zone. Agro-Ecosystems 7: 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, M. L. 1981. Tropical deforestation and genetic resources conservation. Stud. Third World Societies 14: 277–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. The Value of Conserving Genetic Resources. U.S. Gov. Printing Off., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E., D. Posey, J. Frechione, and L. F. da Silva. 1983. Resource exploitation in Amazonia: Ethnoecological examples from four populations. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 52: 163–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, M. 1977. Farming for Profit in a Hungry World. Allanheld, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C. M., and E. Pardo-Tejeda. 1982.Brosimum alicastrum (Moraceae): Uses and potential in Mexico. Econ. Bot. 36: 166–175.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plucknett, D. L., and N. J. H. Smith. 1982. Agricultural research and Third World food production. Science 217: 215–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. 1983. Indigenous ecological knowledge and development of the Amazon.In Moran, E., ed, The Dilemma of Amazonian Development. Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J. D. 1971. Forest Utilization by Tarascan Agriculturalists in Michoacan. Ph.D. diss., U.C.L. A. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, R. E., and R. H. Booth. 1983. Interdisciplinary teams in agricultural research and development. Cult. & Agric. 20: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseberry, W. 1976. Rent, differentiation and the development of capitalism among peasants. Amer. Anthropol. 78: 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski, J. 1966. Vegetatión del estado de San Luis Potosí. Actas Ci. Potosina 5: 1–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978. Vegetatión de México. Ed. Limusa, Mexico City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, P. A., D. E. Bandy, J. H. Villachica, and J. J. Nicholaides. 1982. Amazon basin soils: Management for continuous crop production. Science 216: 821–827.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, G. 1976. Creating work and caring about workers in tropical forestry. Unasylva 28 114: 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, H. P. 1973. The Green Revolution in India: Prelude to a red one?In Gough, K., and H. P. Sharma, ed, Imperialism and Revolution in South Asia. Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, E. R. 1976. The Edge of the Forest. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, J. S. 1981. Small farmers—or the tropical forest ecosystem? A review of sustainable land use systems of tropical forest areas.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon, D. 1980. Agroforestry: A promising system of improved land management for Latin America. Interciencia 5: 176–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakis, O. 1978. Ancient Maya agriculture and future development. Cult. & Agric. 5: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taussig, M. 1978. Peasant economics and the development of capitalist agriculture in the Cauca Valley, Colombia. Latin Amer. Perspectives 5: 62–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, V. M., A. Argueta, P. Rojas, C. Mapes, and J. Caballero. 1976. Uso multiple del ecosistema, estrategias del ecodesarrollo. Ci. Desarrollo 11: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO/UNEP/FAO. 1978. Tropical Forest Ecosystems. UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphof, J. C. 1968. Dictionary of Economic Plants. Verlag von J. Cramer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadya, A. P. 1983. Progressive contextualization: Methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology 11:265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, D. E. 1976. Food, farming, and the future: The role of traditional agriculture in the developing areas of the world. Social Sci. Quart. 57: 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserstrom, R. 1977. Land and labour in Central Chiapas: A regional analysis. Developm. & Change 8: 441–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978. Population growth and economic development in Chiapas, 1524–1975. Human Ecology 6: 127–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, P. 1979. Agri-silviculture in tropical America. Unasylva 31: 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, G. C. 1977. Integrating forest and small-scale farm systems in Middle America. Agro-Ecosystems 3: 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, G. 1983. Current status of crop plant germplasm. CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 1: 133–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and S. Wilkes. 1972. The Green Revolution. Environment 14: 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, D. E. 1974. Arboriculture in the subsistence of Santa Cruz, Solomon Islands. Econ. Bot. 28: 247–284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alcorn, J.B. Development policy, forests, and peasant farms: Reflections on Huastec-managed forests’ contributions to commercial production and resource conservation. Econ Bot 38, 389–406 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859077

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859077

Keywords

Navigation