Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of morphological variation insesamum indicum

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultivars of sesame from 20 countries were sampled for morphological variability. Taximetric methods, including factor, cluster, discriminant, and principal components analyses, established patterns of similarities and were used to generate groupings among the taxa. The complementary results of the analyses indicate that 8 major groups can be discerned. Plants with tetracarpellate capsules have a distinctive form and comprise the initial separation from the entire collection on the dendrogram. The second branch is a group of purple-tinged plants from India that also includes the proposed progenitor. A short, bushy, early maturing genotype consists of predominantly Turkish cultivars. Another group, composed primarily of Korean accessions, consists of unbranched plants with strap-shaped leaves. Other groups are less easily typified. This characterization of the genetic variation in sesame can be used to identify sources of genetic materials for crop improvement, as well as to provide information about the evolution and genetic differentiation of the crop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Baker, H. G. 1953. Race formation and reproductive method in flowering plants.In Symposia Soc. Expl. Biol., Evolution, No. 7, p. 114–145.

  • Baum, B. R. 1970. The problem of classifying cultivars with special emphasis on oat(Avena) cultivars. Canad. J. Bot. 48: 1373–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981. Taxonomy of the infraspecific variability of cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 29: 209–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedigian, D., and J. R. Harlan. 1983. Nuba agriculture and ethnobotany, with particular reference to sesame and sorghum. Econ. Bot. 37: 384–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and —. 1986. Evidence for cultivation of sesame in the ancient world. Econ. Bot. 40: 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, D. S. Seigler, and J. R. Harlan. 1985. Sesamin, sesamolin and the origin of sesame. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 13: 133–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, A. M., Jr., D. W. Brooks, G. Harbottle, and E. V. Sayre. 1976. Application of multivariate techniques to analytical data on Aegean ceramics. Archaeometry 18: 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackith, R. E., and R. A. Reyment. 1971. Multivariate Morphometrics. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. L. 1983. Observation, classification and description.In J. G. McIvor and R. A. Bray, ed, Genetic Resources of Forage Plants, p. 293–298. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, East Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T., F. J. Ayala, G. L. Stebbins, and J. W. Valentine. 1977. Evolution. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O. H., and M. E. Soulé. 1981. Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. R. 1970. Evolution of cultivated plants.In O. H. Frankel and E. Bennett, ed, Genetic Resources in Plants—Their Exploration and Conservation, p. 19–32. Davis, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975. Geographic patterns of variation in some cultivated plants. J. Heredity 66: 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J. 1975. A Primer of Multivariate Statistics. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltebrandt, V. M. 1932. Sesame(Sesamum indicum L.). Bull. Appl. Bot. Genet. PL Breed. Series 9: 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopke, P. K. 1983. The application of multivariate analysis to environmental data.In D. F. S. Natuoch and P. K. Hopke, ed, Analytical Aspects of Environmental Chemistry, p. 219–262. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, C. M., G. V. Narayana, and C. R. Seshadri. 1950. The wild gingelly of Malabar. Madras Agric. J. 37: 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khidir, M. O. 1973. Genetic studies in sesame. II. Inheritance of flower colour and number of locules per pod. Exp. Agric. 9: 361–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and S. H. El Awad. 1972. Studies on floral biology in sesame. Sudan Agric. J. 7: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krull, C. F., and N. E. Borlaug. 1970. The utilization of collections in plant breeding and production.In O. H. Frankel and E. Bennett, ed, Genetic Resources in Plants—Their Exploration and Conservation, p. 427–439. Davis, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langham, D. G. 1945. Genetics of sesame. II. Inheritance of seed pod number, aphid resistance, "yellow leaf," and wrinkled leaves. J. Heredity 36: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947. Genetics of sesame. IV. Some genetic variations in the color of the sesame flower. J. Heredity 38: 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. 1919. Sesame and flax.In Sino-Iranica. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Anthropol. Series 15: 288–296.

  • Martinez, H. D., and V. L. Quilantan. 1963–1964. Percentage of natural cross pollination of sesame in Iguala. Agric. Teen. Mexico 2: 175–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar, N. M., and K. L. Mehra. 1970. Sesame: its uses, botany, cytogenetics and origin. Econ. Bot. 24: 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohara, S. 1933. Genetical studies onSesamum indicum L. J. Coll. Agric. Tokyo Univ. 12: 227–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, D. C. 1973. Aggregative Hierarchical Clustering Program Write-up, Preliminary Version. Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, MA.

  • SAS Institute. 1982. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, A., and A. Gupta. 1949. Pollination studies inSesamum orientale L. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 9: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, E. A. 1971. Castor, Sesame, Safflower. Barnes and Noble, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. T. 1983. Analysis of plant evaluation data.In J. G. McIvor and R. A. Bray, ed, Genetic Resources of Forage Plants, p. 293–298. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, East Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermanos, D. M. 1980. Sesame.In W. R. Fehr and H. H. Hadley, ed, Hybridization of Crop Plants, p. 549–563. Agron. Soc. Amer, and Crop Sci. Soc, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part of the dissertation submitted by DB to fulfill the requirements for the Ph.D. in the Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bedigian, D., Smyth, C.A. & Harlan, J.R. Patterns of morphological variation insesamum indicum . Econ Bot 40, 353–365 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858991

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858991

Keywords

Navigation