Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flower abnormalities

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Allan, H. H., andV. D. Zotov. 1930. A case of malformation inClematis foetida. New Zealand Jour. Sci. Tech.11(6): 362–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C. E. 1932. Sex-inheritance and sex-determination. Amer. Nat.66: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allman, G. J. 1851. On the morphology of the fruit in the Cruciferae, as illustrated by a monstrosity in the wallflower. Report Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci.21(2): 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appl, Johann. 1929. Weitere Mitteilungen über die Aufspaltung eines Bastards zwischenOriganum majorana L. undOriganum vulgare in der F2 und F3-Generation. Genetica11: 519–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1933. Artkreuzungen, Geschlechtsvererbung und Nondisjunction bei Lip-penblütlern aus der Thymiangruppe. Blätter für Pflanzenzücht.11(3/4): 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnal, C. 1952. Remarques sur le déterminisme du sexe à propos d’un saule androgyne. Ann. Univ. Saraviensis1: 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1954. Gradients sexuals chez les Phanérogames. Rapp. et Comm. 8me Congr. Int. Bot. (Paris), Sects. 7 & 8, p. 291.

  • Atkinson, G. F. 1898. Experiments on the morphology ofArisaema triphyllum. (Abstr.) Bot. Gaz.25: 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, Priscilla. 1929. Chromosome number and morphology inNicotiana. IV. The nature and effects of chromosomal irregularities inN. alata var.grandifiora. Univ. Calif. Publ. in Bot.11 (15): 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, L. H. 1941. The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture. (Key to the families and genera, pp. 80–85.) The Macmillan Company, New York, xxiv + 3639 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W., E. R. Saunders, andR. C. Punnett. 1905. Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Report II. Sweet pea, Types of pollen. Reports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society (London)2: 1–154 (pp. 80–83).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andI. Sutton. 1919. Double flowers and sex-linkage inBegonia. Jour. of Genet.8: 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur, Erwin. 1924. Untersuchungen über das Wesen, die Entstehung und die Vererbung von Rassenunterscheiden beiAntirrhinum majus. Bibliotheca Genetica4: 170 pp. + 5 plates and linkage maps. Geb. Borntraeger, Leipzig.

  • Beuzenberg, E. J. 1961. Observations on sex differentiation and cytotaxonomy of the New Zealand species of the Hymenantherinae (Violaceae). New Zealand Jour. Sci.4(2): 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, C. A. 1945. Effect of commercial fertilizers on the sex expression of hemp. Bot. Gaz.107: 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaringhem, L. 1904. Sur une monstruosité deZea Mays tunicata D.C. provoquée par un traumatisme. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol.50: 555–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1905. Anomalies héréditaires provoquées par des traumatismes. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.140: 378–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthwick, H. A. 1962. Effects of light intensity and quality on flowering and fruit set. Campbell Soup Co., Proc. Plant Science Symposium, Camden, New Jersey, pp. 189–200.

  • Borthwick, H. A., andN. J. Scully. 1954. Photoperiodic responses of hemp. Bot. Gaz.116: 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantley, B. B., andG. F. Warren. 1958. The effect of nitrogen, photoperiod and auxin on sex expression in the muskmelon. Plant Physiology33(Suppl.): xix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredemann, G.,K. Garber, W. Huhnke, undR. Von Sengbusch. 1961. Die Züchtung von monözischen und diözischen, fasertragreichen Hanfsorten (Fibrimon und Fibridia). Zeitschr. Pflanzenz.46: 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, G. 1928. Chromosomal mutations inSaecharum. Rec. Trav. Bot. Neerlandaisv25A: 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, R. A. 1964. Genetic repression in multicellular organisms. Amer. Nat.98: 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchenau, F. 1903. Entwickelung von Staubblättern im Innern von Fruchtknoten beiMelandryum rubrum Garcke. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.21: 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk, L. G. 1960. Male-sterile flower anomalies in interspecific tobacco hybrids. Jour. Hered.51: 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, J. W. 1930. Carpellody in the wheat flower and its inheritance. Trans. & Proc. New Zealand Inst.61: 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, W. H. 1929. Catalase activity and sex in plants. Amer. Jour. Bot.16: 221–224.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1932. Sex inArisaema triphyllum. Ohio Jour. Sci.32: 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittenden, F. J. 1914. The rogue wallflower. Jour. Bot.52: 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chroboczek, Emh. 1934. A study of some ecological factors influencing seed-stalk development in beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Mem. 154, 84 pp.

  • Clavier, C. 1961. Etudes sur la sexualité du ricin (Ricinus communis L.). Cah. Rech. Agron. Rabat1961: No. 13: 111–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clos, D. 1859. Fascicule d’observations de tératologie végétale. IV. Cératomanie d’Orrhislaxiflora L. Mém. Acad. Sci. Toulouse, sér. 5,3: 103–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costerus, J. C. 1907. Pistillody of the stamens inNicotiana. Rec. Trav. Bot. Neerl.4: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, K. V. O. 1932. Über eine Form vonPrimula officinalis mit pistilloiden Staubgefässen und ihre Vererbung. Hereditas17: 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, A. J., andC. M. Gibson. 1917. Note on the distribution of sexes inMyrica gale. New Phytol.16: 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detjen, L. R. 1927. Sterility in the common cabbage (Brassica Oleracea). Mem. Hort. Soc. New York3: 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchartre. 1860. Sur une monstruosité deDelphinium Ajacis. Bull. Soc. Bot. France7: 483–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. A. 1924. A genetic view of sex expression in the flowering plants. Science59: 176–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erlanson, E. W., andF. J. Hermann. 1927. The morphology and cytology of perfect flowers inPopulus tremuloides Michx. Mich. Acad. Sci.8: 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlenmeyer, H., andM. Geiger-Huber. 1935. Reversal of sex inMelandrium album caused by a fungus. Helv. Chim. Acta18: 921–923.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, A. 1931. Weitere Studien über die Vererbung der Calycanthemie beiPrimula. Archiv Julius Klaus-Stiftung Vererbungsforschung6: 277–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figdor, W. 1911. Übergangsbildungen von Pollen zu Fruchtblättern beiHumulus Japonifus Sieb, et Zucc. und deren Urasachen. Sitzber. Kais. Ak. Wiss. Wien120: 689–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, E. 1861. Deux anomalies développées sur leCakile maritima. Bull. Soc. Bot. France8: 696–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galun, E. 1956. Effect of seed treatment on sex expression in the cucumber. Experientia12: 218–219.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparrini, G. 1862. Ricerche sulla embriogenia della canape. Atti Accad. Sci. Fis. e Mat.1: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisenheyner, L. 1919. Uber eine monströseLinaria vulgaris. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.37: 479–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geitler, L. 1941. Embryosäcke aus Pollenkörnen bei Ornithogalum. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.59: 419–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giard, A. 1898. Les variations de la sexualité chez les végétaux. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. Paris10: 730–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K. 1908. Einleitung in die Experimentelle Morphologie der Pflanzen. Leipzig & Berlin.

  • Goethe, J. W. von. 1790. Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären. Translation by Emily M. Cox. 1863. Essay on the metamorphosis of plants. Jour. Bot.1: 327–345, 360–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. 1938. A Lymantria-like case of intersexuality in plants (Oehlkers’ work) and its meaning for the theory of sex determination in plants. Jour. Genet.36: 531–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, T. H. 1930. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. IX. Mutations following treatment with X-rays and radium. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.11: 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, T. H., andP. Avery. 1934. The cytogenetics of fourteen types derived from a single X-rayed sex cell ofNicotiana tabacum. Jour. Genet.29: 327–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, W. 1961. Über die zeitliche Aufeinanderfolge bestimmter Gestaltungsprozesse bei der Ausdifferenzierung von Vegetationskegeln zu Blüten. Naturwissenschaften49: 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, J. 1919. Eine abnorme Blütenbildung beiLinaria vulgaris. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.37: 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gris, A. 1858. Note sur quelques cas de monstruosité et spécialement sur la rose verte. Ann. Sci. Nat., IVe Sér. (Bot.)9: 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grun, P., M. Aubertin, andA. Radlow. 1962. Multiple differentiation of plasmons of diploid species ofSolarium. Genetics47: 1321–1333.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andA. Radlow. 1960. The gene-plasmon interactions ofSolanum phureja andS. chacoence. (Abstr.) Genetics45: 990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubler, A. 1862. Des anomalies aberrantes et régularisantes, à propos de deux cas tératologiques, l’un de géantisme et l’autre d’hermaphroditisme, observés sur lePistacia lentiscus. Bull. Soc. Bot. France9: 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Marion Trufant. 1961. Teratology inTrillium grandiflorum. Amer. Jour. Bot.48: 803–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, R. 1948. Vegetative and reproductive development ofKalanchoë blossfeldiana as influenced by photoperiodism. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.2: 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshberger, J. W. 1907. An unusual method of vegetative reproduction inDionaea muscipula. Torreya7: 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronn, A., undM. Basarman. 1952. Über die F2 der Bryoniabastarde und ihre Bedeuting für das Problem der Geschlechtsrealisation. Rev. Fac. Sci. Univ. Istanbul7: 138–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinricher, E. 1891. Neue Beiträge zur Pflanzenteratologie und Blüthenmorphologie. Eine Blüthe vonCypripedium Calceolus L. mit Ruckschlagserscheinungen. Oester. Bot. Zeitschr.41: 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinricher, E. 1931. Untersuchungen über die Nachkommenschaft derPrimula Kewensis und ihre Vielgestaltigkeit. Denkschriften Akad. Wiss. Dien, Mathem. naturw. Kl.102: 69–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henslow, G. 1882. Note on staminiferous corollas ofDigitalis purpurea andSolarium tuberosum. Gard. Chron., Ser. 3,19: 216–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J. 1956. Auxin and sexuality inCannabis saliva. Physiologia Plantarum9: 588–597.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1957. The experimental modification of sex expression in flowering plants. Biol. Rev. (Cambridge Phil. Soc.)32: 38–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1959. Growth substances and flower morphogenesis. Jour. Linn. Soc. London Bot.56: 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andY. Heslop-Harrison. 1957. The effect of carbon monoxide on sexuality inMercurialis ambigua L. Fils. New Phytologist56: 352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, andY. Heslop-Harrison. 1958. Long-day and auxin induced male sterility inSilene pendula L. Port. Acta Biol. Ser. A,5: 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heufler. 1843. Monströse Blumen vonLinaria vulgaris. Linnaea17: 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, W. S., andH. H. Smith. 1965. Induced flowering in a vegetative tobacco hybrid. Jour. Hered.56: 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyet-Lavergne, Ph. 1935. Que faut-il penser des lois de sexualisation cytoplasmique? Rev. Gén. Sci. Pures et Appl.64: 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajanus, Birger. 1918. Genetische Studien über die Blüten vonPapaver somniferum L. Arkiv för Botanik15(18): 1–87 + 3 plates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihara, H. 1951. Substitution of nucleus and its effects on genome manifestations Cytologia16: 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschleger, Fr. 1866. Nouveaux faits tératologiques. Ann. Ass. philomatique vogésorhénane; 6me livraison.

  • Köhler, D. 1958. Die Entwicklung vonCannabis satva unter dem Einfluss verschiedener Tageslängen. Physiol. Plantarum11: 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, A. 1955. Changes in sex in flowers of the hybridSolanum rybinii XS. chacoense. III. Data about the reciprocal crossSolanum chacoense XS. rybinii. Genetica27: 465–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laibach, F., andJ. Kribben. 1950. Über die Bedeutung der ß-Indolylessigsäure für die Blütenbildung. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.63: 119–120.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. 1952. Physiology of flowering. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.3: 265–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, M. J. 1906. Une nouvelle hypothèse sur le déterminisme du sexe. Ass. Franç. Adv. Sci.35: 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxton. 1866. Double-blossomed peas. Gard. Chron.,1866, p. 901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighty, C. E. andW. J. Sando. 1924. Pistillody in wheat flowers. Jour. Hered.15: 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., andL. K. Crowe. 1952. Male sterility as an outbreeding mechanism inOriganum vulgare. Heredity6: 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licopoli, G. 1867. Osservationi teratologiche sul fiore delMelianthus major. Annali Accad. Aspiranti Natur. Napoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehwing, W. F. 1938. Physiological aspects of sex in Angiosperms. Bot. Rev.4: 581–625.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A., andD. Löve. 1940. Experimental sex reversal in plants. Svensk bot. Tidskr.34: 248–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz. 1897. Note sur un safran monstrueux. Bull. Soc. Bot. France44: 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden-Jones, E. M., andW. B. Turrill. 1931. Flower mutations in the primrose. I. Origins and genetics. New Phytol.30: 284–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martz, M. 1928. Anomalies de l’androcée chez un hybride du genreDigitalis. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.186: 642–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. A., andW. Mishanek. 1964. The “spontaneous” formation of rudimentary carpels on leaf tissue. Bioscience14: 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, M. T. 1867. On polliniferous ovules in a rose (Rosa arvensis). Jour. Bot.5: 318–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, M. R. 1869. Vegetable Teratology. Robert Hardwicks, London, xxxviii + 534 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, H. C. 1925. The genetics of sex in hemp. Jour. Agr. Res.31: 935–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, R. M. 1913. Supernumerary carpels in cotton bolls. U.S. Dep. Agr. Circ. No.111: 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, T. 1878. Notes onAcer rubrum. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia,1878: 122–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. R., andV. G. Meyhr. 1961. Cytoplasmic male sterility in cotton. (Abstr.) Genetics46: 883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, V. G. 1965. Environmental effects on the differentiation of abnormal cotton flowers. (Abstr.) Amer. Jour. Bot.52: 620.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andM. Buffet. 1962. Cytoplasmic effects on external-ovule production in cotton. Jour. Hered.43: 251–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. D., andS. H. Wittwer. 1962. Chemical regulation of flower sex expression and vegetative growth inCucumis sativus L. Science136: 880–881.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohl, H. von. 1837. Sur la metamorphose des anthères en carpelles. Annales Sci. Nat. 2e Sér.8: 50–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, W. E. de. 1933. Die Entstehungsweise anormaler Pollenkörner bei Hyazinthen, Tulpen und Narzissen. Cytologia5: 31–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molliard, N. 1896. Homologie du massif pollinique et de l’ovule. Rev. Gén. Bot.8: 271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1901. Fleurs doubles et parasitisme. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.133: 548–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1904. Virescences et proliférations florales produites par des parasites agissant à distance. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.139: 930–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1905. Deux cas de duplicature florale provoqués par une nutrition défectueuse, et hérédité de cette anomalie. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, sér. 4,52: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montford, H. M. 1931. Flower mutations in the primrose. II. Morphology and anatomical investigation. New Phytol.30: 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murneek, A. E. 1927. Physiology of reproduction in horticultural plants. II. The physiological basis of intermittent sterility with special reference to the spider flower. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 106, 37 pp.

  • Naithani, S. P. 1937. Chromosome studies inHyacinthus orientalis L. III. Reversal of sexual state in the anthers ofHyacinthus orientalis L., var. Yellow Hammer. Ann. Bot. (London) N. S.1: 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, M. 1936. Experimental and cytological studies on the instability of the meiotic division of the pollenmothercells ofImpatiens balsamina L. caused by the effect of high air temperature. Mem. Fac. Sci. Agr. Taihoku Imp. Univ. 17, 121 pp.

  • Nelson, Alexander. 1928-1929. The inheritance of sex in an abnormal (carpellodic) walflower. Papers & Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania1928–1929: 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemec, B. 1898. O pylu petaloidnich tycinek hyacintu (Hyacinthus Orientalis L.). Rozpraxy Ceska Akad. PragII, 7, 18 pp. + plates.

  • Nitsch, J. P. 1962. Basic physiological processes affecting fruit development. Campbell Soup Co., Proc. Plant Science Symposium, Camden, New Jersey, 1962, pp. 5–23.

  • -. 1963. The mediation of climatic effects through endogenous regulating substances. Environmental Control of Plant Growth. (Ed. by L. T. Evans.) Proc. of Symposium, Canberra, Australia, Aug. 1962, pp. 175–193.

  • Noack, R. 1962a. Plasmatische Vererbung in der GattungBegonia. Zeitschrift für Botanik50: 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1962b. Die zwittrigen und eingeschlechtichen Blüten vonBegonia cathayana. II. Der Einfluss äusserer Faktoren auf die Zwitterblütenbildung und deren Fruchtbarkeit. Zeitschr. Botanik50: 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nypels, P. 1897. Notes pathologiques. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg.36: 274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehlkers, F. 1940. Bastardierungsversuche in der GattungStreptocarpus Lindley. III. Neue Ergebnisse über die Genetik von Wuchgestalt und Geschlechtsbestimmung. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.58: 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, A. R., andS. N. Postlethwait. 1964. Chemically induced phenocopy of a normal inflorescence in fascicled ear (Fa), a maize mutant. (Abstr.) Amer. Jour. Bot.51: 666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkey, W. 1957. Cytoplasmic influence in the production of the pistillate sex expression in castorbeans. Agron. Jour.49: 427–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penzig, O. 1886. Note teratologiche. I. Peloria terminale diAcanthus mollis. II. Anomalie fiorali di Orchidee. Malpighia1: 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1890. Pflanzen-Teratologie. A. Ciminago, Genua, 540 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. E., andL. D. Anhder. 1960. Induction of staminate flowers on gynoecious cucumbers with gibberellin A3. Science131: 1673–1674.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petit-Thouars, A. du. 1807. Sur un changement d’étamines en pistils dans la Joubarbe des toits. Nouveau Bull. Soc. Philomat. Paris I: 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peto, F. H. 1938. Cytology of poplar species and natural hybrids. Canad. Jour. Res. Sect. C,16: 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyritsch, J. 1881. Zur aetiologie der chloranthieen eniger arabis-arten. Pringsheim’s Jahrb. für Wissensch. Botanik 13(1).

  • Phipps, I. F. 1928. Heritable characters in maize. XXXI. Tassel seed-4. Jour. Hered.19: 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, K. B., Keith A. Lahr, andI. M. Atkins. 1965. Cross-pollination of malesterile winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) havingAegilops caudata L. andAegilops ovata L. Cytoplasm. Crop. Sci.5: 161–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwait, S. N., andO. E, Nelson. 1964. Characterization of development in maize through the use of mutants. I. The polytypic (Pt) and Ramosa-1 (ra1) mutants. Amer. Jour. Bot.51: 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, F. J. 1916. Change of sex in hemp. Jour. Hered.7: 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghaven, V. 1961. Studies on the floral histogenesis and physiology ofPerilla. III. Effects of indoleacetic acid on the flowering of apical buds and expiants in culture. Amer. Jour. Bot.48: 870–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andW. P. Jacobs. 1961. Studies on the floral histogenesis and physiology ofPerilla. II. Floral induction in cultured apical buds ofP. frutescens. Amer. Jour. Bot.48: 751–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainio, A. J. 1927. Uber die Intersexualität bei der GattungSalix. Annales Societatis Zoolog.-Botanicae Fennicae, Vanamo,5: 165–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, A. 1911. Pistillody in stamens ofHypericum nudiflorum. Bot. Gaz.51: 230–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, F. D., andG. F. Sprague. 1932. Some factors affecting the reversal of sex expression in the tassels of maize. Amer. Nat.66: 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roark, B., T. R. Pfrimmer, andM. E. Merkl. 1964. Effects of some insecticide formulations on fruiting of the cotton plant. Crop. Sci.4: 97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, R. A. 1890. A double orchid:Epidendrum vitellinum Fl. pl. Gard. Chron., ser. 3,8: 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytz, W. 1921. Blütenanomalien. Sitzungs-Ber. Bern. Bot. Ges.v. 17 Okt. in Mitteil d. Naturf. Fes. Bern aus D. Jahre1921: xxv-xxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, S. J. A. 1863. On a sexual monstrosity, consisting in the development of polleniferous ovules, in two species ofPassiflora. Trans. Linn. Soc.24: 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E. R. 1911. On inheritance of mutation in the common foxglove (Digitalis purpurea). New Phytol.10: 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, J. H. 1921. Influence of environment on sexual expression in hemp. Bot. Gaz.71: 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1922. Control of the sexual state inArisaema triphyllum andArisaema dracontium. Amer. Jour. Bot.9: 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1923. The influence of relative length of daylight on the reversal of sex in hemp. Ecology4: 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1925. The influence of substratum on the percentage of sex reversal in winter-grown hemp. Ohio Jour. Sci.25: 172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1927. Control of sex reversal in the tassel of Indian corn. Bot. Gaz.84: 440–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1929. Progeny resulting from selfpollination of staminate plant ofMorus alba showing sex reversal. Bot. Gaz.87: 653–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1931. The fluctuation curve of sex reversal in staminate hemp plants induced by photoperiodicity. Amer. Jour. Bot.18: 424–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimper, C. 1829. Correspondenz. Flora12: 423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, G. 1953. Beobachtungen über die Geschlechtsverhältnisse bei jungen Graupappeln und Aspen. Zeitschr. Forstgenetik2: 102–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. G. 1906. On abnormal flowers ofSolarium tuberosum. New Phytol.5: 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, F. W. 1952. Zwei neue Funde von Zwitterigkeit bei der Aspe. Zeitschr. Forstgenetik1: 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semeniuk, P. 1964. An effect of temperature on development and differentiation of rose flowers. Amer. Hort. Mag.43: 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seringe. 1830. Notice sur une monstruosité duDiplotaxis tenuifolia. Bull. Bot. Genève, No. 1, pp. 5–8.

  • Sharp, L. W. 1925. The factorial interpretation of sex-determination. La Cellule35: 195–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck, C. H. 1910. The origin of heterospory in Marsilia. Bot. Gaz.49: 19–39 + 6 plates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shikriss, O. 1961. Gibberellin as sex regulator inRicinus communis. Science133: 2061–2062.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andW. L. George, Jr. 1964. Sensitivity of female inbreds ofCucumis sativus to sex reversion by gibberellin. Science143: 1452–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, andW. L. George, andJ. A. Quiñones. 1964. Gynodioecism in Cucumbers. Genetics49: 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, G. H. 1910. Inheritance of sex inLychnis. Bot. Gaz.49: 110–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, S. V. 1924. Über eine spontan entstandene Blütenvergrünung vonTorenia und das genetische Verhalten ihrer Nachkommenschaft. Jahrb. wiss. Bot.63: 172–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirks, M. J. 1924. Die gynanthere form des Goldlacks und ihre Vererbung. Genetica6: 537–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. W. 1963. The mechanism of sex determination inRumex hastatules. Genetics48: 1265–1288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. O. 1927. A pistillatePrunus. Jour. Hered.18: 537–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. J. 1908. Een merkwaardige Klapper. Teysmannia19: 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H. 1965. A gene for unfruitfulness in the castorbean plant and its utilization in hybrid seed production. Crop Sci.5: 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stow, I. 1930. Experimental studies on the formation of the embryosac-like giant pollen grains in the anthers ofHyacinthus orientalis. Cytologia1: 417–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1933. On the female tendencies of the embryosac-like giant pollen grain ofHyacinthus Orientalis. Cytologia5: 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talley, P. J. 1934. Carbohydrate-nitrogen ratios with respect to the sexual expression of hemp. Plant Physiol.9: 731–748.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tepfer, S. S. 1953. Floral anatomy and ontogeny inAquilegia formosa var.truncata andRanunculus re pens. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.25: 513–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,R. I. Greyson, W. R. Craig, andJoseph L. Hindman. 1963. In vitro culture of floral buds ofAquilegia. Amer. Jour. Bot.50: 1035–1045.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. G. 1956. Effect of temperature and length of day on the sex expression of monoecious and dioecious angiosperms. Nature178: 552–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, H. C. 1939. Temperature in relation to vegetative and reproductive development in plants. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.37: 672–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thouars, Du Petit. 1807. see Petit-Thouars.

  • Tibeau, M. E. 1936. Time factor in utilization of mineral nutrients by hemp. Plant Physiol.11: 731–747.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, N. E. 1961. Alteration of plant growth by chemicals. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club88: 313–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tournois, J. 1911. Anomalies florales du houblon japonais et du chanvre determinees par des semis hatifs. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)153: 1017–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschermak, E. 1932. Über einige Blütenanomalien bei Primeln und ihre Vererbungsweise. Biologia Generaiis8: 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, H. B. 1922. A case of pistillody and staminody in the plum. Torreya22: 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usteri. 1907. Studien überCarica Papaya L. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.25: 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velenovsky. 1909. Die vergleichende Morphologie der Pflanzen, Teil iii. Prag, 1909.

  • Violle, J. 1911. Sur un retour momentane des fleurs doubles d’un rosier à la forme simple. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.153: 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemin, Paul. 1916. Modifications de l’androcee et extension du pistil dans le genrePapayer. Bull. Soc. Bot. France63: 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw, C. W. 1957. The floral meristem as a reaction system. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., Sec. B,66: 394–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1963. Experimental investigations of floral morphogenesis inPetasitcs hybridus. Nature198: 560–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherwax, P. 1925a. Anomalies in maize and its relatives.-II Many-flowered spikelets in maize. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club52: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1925b. Anomalies in maize and its relatives.-III Carpellody in maize. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club52: 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, O. E. 1914. Studies of teratological phenomena in their relation to evolution and the problems of heredity. I. A study of certain floral abnormalities inNicotiana and their bearing on theories of dominance. Amer. Jour. Bot.1: 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, R. O. 1929. Studies inRanunculus. II. The cytological basis of sex inR. acris L. Jour. Genet.21: 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigand. 1856. Beitrage zur Pflanzenteratologie. Flora39: 713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijewantha, R. T., andG. L. Stebbins. 1964. Developmental and biochemical effects of the agropyroides mutation in barley. Genetics50: 65–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittwer, S. H., andM. J. Bukovac. 1962a. Exogenous plant growth substances affecting floral initiation and fruit set. Campbell Soup Co., Proc. Plant Science Symposium, Camden, New Jersey, 1962, pp. 65–87.

  • ——, andM. J. Bukovac. 1962b. Staminate flower formation on gyncecious cucumbers as influenced by the various gibberellins. Naturwissenschaften49: 305–306.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andI. G. Hillyer. 1954. Chemical induction of male sterility in Cucurbits. Science120: 893–894.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, andN. E. Tolbert. 1960. 2-chloroethyl trimethylammonium chloride and related compounds as plant growth substances. V. Growth, flowering, and fruiting responses as related to those induced by auxin and gibberellin. Plant Physiol.35: 871–877.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worsdell, W. C. 1916. The principles of plant-teratology. Vol. II. The Ray Society, London, xvi + 296 pp. + plates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yampolsky, C. 1919. Inheritance of sex inMercurialis annua. Amer. Jour. Bot.6: 410–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabka, G. G. 1961. Photoperiodism inAmaranthus caudatus. I. A reexamination of the photoperiodic response. Amer. Jour. Bot.48: 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeevaart, J. A. D. 1962. Physiology of flowering. Science137: 723–731.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Delta Branch, Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station, Stoneville, Mississippi

    Vesta G. Meyer

Authors
  1. Vesta G. Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, V.G. Flower abnormalities. Bot. Rev 32, 165–218 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858659

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858659

Keywords

Search

Navigation